Barrick and Tanzanian Government Progress Discussions in Settlement of Acacia Disputes

Barrick and Tanzanian Government Progress Discussions in Settlement of Acacia Disputes

Geza Ulole

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Posts
65,136
Reaction score
91,917
Barrick and Tanzanian Government Progress Discussions in Settlement of Acacia Disputes

February 20, 2019 06:43 ET | Source: Barrick Gold Corporation


All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars
TORONTO, Feb. 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:GOLD)(TSX:ABX) (“Barrick” or the “Company”) today announced that the Company, in its capacity as a facilitator, and the Government of Tanzania have arrived at a proposal that sets forth the commercial terms to resolve outstanding disputes concerning Acacia Mining plc’s operations in Tanzania.

The Company will present this proposal to the Independent Directors of Acacia in the near future for their consideration.

The proposed framework is consistent with the agreement announced in October 2017 and includes the following elements:
  • The creation of a local operating company to manage Acacia’s operations in the country.
  • Economic benefits from Acacia’s operations to be shared on a 50/50 basis. The Government’s share of economic benefits would be in the form of royalties, taxes and a 16 percent free carry interest in the Tanzanian operations.
  • A payment of $300 million to the Government of Tanzania to resolve outstanding tax claims, to be paid over time on terms to be settled by the parties.
Mark Bristow, President and CEO of Barrick, said: “Significant amounts of real value have been destroyed by this dispute and, in Barrick`s view, this proposal will allow the business to focus on rebuilding its mining operations in partnership with their respective stakeholders, and most importantly long suffering investors, including Barrick.”

Work is underway to finalize the definitive agreements needed to give effect to the proposal. To become effective, the proposal and those agreements must be approved by Acacia and the Government of Tanzania, in keeping with applicable laws and regulations. Barrick holds a 63.9 percent equity interest in Acacia, a publicly traded company listed on the London Stock Exchange that is operated independently of Barrick.

Barrick Enquiries:
President and CEO
Mark Bristow
+1 647 205 7694
+44 788 071 1386
Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

Graham Shuttleworth
+44 1534 735 333
+44 779 771 1338
Investor and Media Relations
Kathy du Plessis
+44 20 7557 7738
Email: barrick@dpapr.com
Website: www.barrick.com

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this press release, including any information as to Barrick’s strategy, projects, plans, or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “view”, “will”, “future”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to a proposal of commercial terms facilitated by Barrick to resolve outstanding disputes between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: whether the Independent Directors of Acacia will approve the proposal of commercial terms presented to them for the resolution of the dispute between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania; the ultimate terms of any definitive agreement between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania to resolve a dispute relating to the imposition of the concentrate export ban and allegations by the Government of Tanzania that Acacia under-declared the metal content of concentrate exports from Tanzania; the status of certain tax reassessments by the Tanzanian government; the manner in which amendments to the 2010 Mining Act (Tanzania) increasing the royalty rate applicable to metallic minerals such as gold, copper and silver to 6% (from 4%), the new Finance Act (Tanzania) imposing a 1% clearing fee on the value of all minerals exported from Tanzania from July 1, 2017 and the new Mining Regulations announced by the Government of Tanzania in January 2018 will be implemented and the impact of these and other legislative changes on Acacia; whether definitive agreements with respect to the dispute between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania will be successfully finalized and whether Acacia and the Government of Tanzania will approve the terms of any such final agreements; the duration of the Tanzanian ban on mineral concentrate exports; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States, Tanzania, and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper, or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas, and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation, and exploration successes; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor; and the organization of our previously held African gold operations and properties under Acacia as a separate listed Company. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).

Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40- F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.

Barrick Gold Corporation disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
 
I remember some 'economist' and nyang'au arguing here the other day that Acacia parent company Barrick had agreed to pay the $190 Billion.
Very low IQ individuals.

This article confirms that you'll only get 300 million usd, paid over very many years.
 
I remember some 'economist' and nyang'au arguing here the other day that Acacia parent company Barrick had agreed to pay the $190 Billion.
Very low IQ individuals.

This article confirms that you'll only get 300 million usd, paid over very many years.

But the rest will come via share exchange 16% shares to GoT plus profit sharing at 50:50! Headquarters transfer from Jburg to Dar meaning capital gain n other taxes. Royalties increase from 4 to 6% to all minerals found during extraction aside gold! Mineral economics not ur thing, just shut up!
 
But the rest will come via share exchange 16% shares to GoT plus profit sharing at 50:50! Headquarters transfer from Jburg to Dar meaning capital gain n other taxes. Royalties increase from 4 to 6% to all minerals found during extraction aside gold! Mineral economics not ur thing, just shut up!

Keep dreaming.
You will not see more than a 2% increase in revenue.
CCM may have book cooks, but they will never outsmart a big corporate's book cooks.
 
But the rest will come via share exchange 16% shares to GoT plus profit sharing at 50:50!

I assume you mean the rest of the $190 billion? Don't be a comedian.
Even if Acacia submitted 100% of their Tanzanian profit, it would take probably 5,000 years to clear the remaining $189.7 billion.
 
Barrick outlines agreement with Tanzania aimed at ending Acacia gold export ban

NIALL MCGEE
MINING REPORTER
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 20, 2019UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO

Barrick Gold Corp has hammered out a framework agreement with the Tanzanian government that may finally end a crippling multi-year gold export ban at its subsidiary Acacia Mining PLC.

The Toronto-based miner, which has acted as a facilitator for Acacia in negotiations, says it will present a proposal to Acacia in the “near future” for consideration.

The proposal is similar to an earlier tentative agreement announced in October 2017 and would see Acacia split economic benefits from Tanzanian mines 50/50 with the country. Under the latest proposal the London-based miner would also pay the east African government US$300-million to end a long-running tax spat.

The dispute flared up in March 2017 when Tanzania imposed a gold concentrate export ban on Acacia and later accused it of US$200-billion in tax fraud. Subsequently Acacia’s shares collapsed.

Barrick too has seen its share price hurt by the kerfuffle with Acacia’s affected output accounting for about 6 per cent of Barrick’s overall gold production.

Both Barrick’s executive chairman John Thornton, and its new chief executive officer Mark Bristow, have been outspoken about the need for Acacia to pay more taxes in Tanzania.

After Barrick announced its acquisition of Randgold Resources Ltd. in Sept., which brought in Mr. Bristow as CEO, there was hope he might be able to end the Acacia impasse considering his long history of operating successfully in Africa.

“Significant amounts of real value have been destroyed by this dispute,” Mr. Bristow said in a statement on Wednesday.

“This proposal will allow the business to focus on rebuilding its mining operations in partnership with their respective stakeholders, and most importantly long suffering investors, including Barrick”.
The economic benefits payable by Acacia would be in royalties, taxes and a 16 interest in its three Tanzanian mines.

In a brief statement on Wednesday, Acacia said it had not yet received the proposal from Barrick and that any proposal would be subject to review by an independent committee of its board of directors.
Shares in Acacia were up about 5 per cent on the London Stock Exchange in the early afternoon.

In a note to clients, RBC Dominion Securities analyst James Bell wrote that the development is a “small positive for Acacia as it feels like a step closer to lifting the Tanzanian overhang, albeit with uncertainty remaining high.”
 
I assume you mean the rest of the $190 billion? Don't be a comedian.
Even if Acacia submitted 100% of their Tanzanian profit, it would take probably 5,000 years to clear the remaining $189.7 billion.
Hide ur ignorance in Law a claim doesn't mean the value is actual what u want to get back! A reason a lawyer can file a case for one shilling tender. It is meant to get the defendant on the table to answer a claim during a dispute. If u were smart at all u would have realized the whole of Acacia gold is not worthy over $3 bln! Uache upumbavu aisee!
 
Hide ur ignorance in Law a claim doesn't mean the value is actual what u want to get back! A reason a lawyer can file a case for one shilling tender. It is meant to get the defendant on the table to answer a claim during a dispute. If u were smart at all u would have realized the whole of Acacia gold is not worthy over $3 bln! Uache upumbavu aisee!

Your claim was $190 billion.
What you got was $300 million... spread out over many years.
If my lawyer brought me such results, I would fire him on the spot.
 
I remember some 'economist' and nyang'au arguing here the other day that Acacia parent company Barrick had agreed to pay the $190 Billion.
Very low IQ individuals.

This article confirms that you'll only get 300 million usd, paid over very many years.
Its bad to use spinal cord when thinking
 
Barrick and Tanzanian Government Progress Discussions in Settlement of Acacia Disputes

February 20, 2019 06:43 ET | Source: Barrick Gold Corporation


All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars
TORONTO, Feb. 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:GOLD)(TSX:ABX) (“Barrick” or the “Company”) today announced that the Company, in its capacity as a facilitator, and the Government of Tanzania have arrived at a proposal that sets forth the commercial terms to resolve outstanding disputes concerning Acacia Mining plc’s operations in Tanzania.

The Company will present this proposal to the Independent Directors of Acacia in the near future for their consideration.

The proposed framework is consistent with the agreement announced in October 2017 and includes the following elements:
  • The creation of a local operating company to manage Acacia’s operations in the country.
  • Economic benefits from Acacia’s operations to be shared on a 50/50 basis. The Government’s share of economic benefits would be in the form of royalties, taxes and a 16 percent free carry interest in the Tanzanian operations.
  • A payment of $300 million to the Government of Tanzania to resolve outstanding tax claims, to be paid over time on terms to be settled by the parties.
Mark Bristow, President and CEO of Barrick, said: “Significant amounts of real value have been destroyed by this dispute and, in Barrick`s view, this proposal will allow the business to focus on rebuilding its mining operations in partnership with their respective stakeholders, and most importantly long suffering investors, including Barrick.”

Work is underway to finalize the definitive agreements needed to give effect to the proposal. To become effective, the proposal and those agreements must be approved by Acacia and the Government of Tanzania, in keeping with applicable laws and regulations. Barrick holds a 63.9 percent equity interest in Acacia, a publicly traded company listed on the London Stock Exchange that is operated independently of Barrick.

Barrick Enquiries:
President and CEO
Mark Bristow
+1 647 205 7694
+44 788 071 1386
Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

Graham Shuttleworth
+44 1534 735 333
+44 779 771 1338
Investor and Media Relations
Kathy du Plessis
+44 20 7557 7738
Email: barrick@dpapr.com
Website: www.barrick.com

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this press release, including any information as to Barrick’s strategy, projects, plans, or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “view”, “will”, “future”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to a proposal of commercial terms facilitated by Barrick to resolve outstanding disputes between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: whether the Independent Directors of Acacia will approve the proposal of commercial terms presented to them for the resolution of the dispute between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania; the ultimate terms of any definitive agreement between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania to resolve a dispute relating to the imposition of the concentrate export ban and allegations by the Government of Tanzania that Acacia under-declared the metal content of concentrate exports from Tanzania; the status of certain tax reassessments by the Tanzanian government; the manner in which amendments to the 2010 Mining Act (Tanzania) increasing the royalty rate applicable to metallic minerals such as gold, copper and silver to 6% (from 4%), the new Finance Act (Tanzania) imposing a 1% clearing fee on the value of all minerals exported from Tanzania from July 1, 2017 and the new Mining Regulations announced by the Government of Tanzania in January 2018 will be implemented and the impact of these and other legislative changes on Acacia; whether definitive agreements with respect to the dispute between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania will be successfully finalized and whether Acacia and the Government of Tanzania will approve the terms of any such final agreements; the duration of the Tanzanian ban on mineral concentrate exports; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States, Tanzania, and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper, or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas, and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation, and exploration successes; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor; and the organization of our previously held African gold operations and properties under Acacia as a separate listed Company. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).

Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40- F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.

Barrick Gold Corporation disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
not so fast, ndugu!

look who's here....
Acacia Yaikana Barrick Mchana Kweupe!. Atoa Press Release na Kumruka Barrick Kuwa Hajui Chochote Kuhusu Makubaliaano Yoyote na Tanzania. - JamiiForums
 
if that's a "propagandist", where's our freaking money then?
it's over a year now we've been feeding on the janja-janja mabeberu's lip service.

sisi wengine siyo wakolomije wa kudanganyika kirahisi hivi ndugu!

soma hapa uburudishe roho yako....
Dola milioni 300, siku 90, sentano kipande haijalipwa! acacia inakula hasara, has no capacity to pay! Tumedanganywa? - JamiiForums

Acacia hawakuhusishwa kwenye hayo makubaliano na bado wamekomaa....

a48044ac-a596-4e38-b517-688298152471-jpeg.1027652
 
  • The creation of a local operating company to manage Acacia’s operations in the country.

What the hell does that mean?

ACACIA is operating in Tanzania, owned by Canadians, traded in the UK stock markets.

Creating a “local operating company” which will obviously be a wholly owned subsidiary of ACACIA and BARRICK will make what kind of a difference?
 
But the rest will come via share exchange 16% shares to GoT plus profit sharing at 50:50! Headquarters transfer from Jburg to Dar meaning capital gain n other taxes. Royalties increase from 4 to 6% to all minerals found during extraction aside gold! Mineral economics not ur thing, just shut up!
50:50 is for economical profit sharing not just profit........


sasa jiulize kwann wameingiza neno economic profit hawakuishia na profit tu!

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
serikali hii sijui inakosea wapi, au hawajui kingereza?.......


kwann kila mara taarifa ya waziri kabudi kwa watanzania inakua tofauti na taarifa rasmi ya barrick kuhusu jambo hilo hilo?????............


waziri kabudi aliulizwa bungeni kwamba serikali imelipwa ile hela na barrick ($300m) akasema siwez sema tumelipwa kiasi gani kwa sababu wadai wetu watakuja kutudai....... leo tena barrick wanathibitisha hela haijalipwa!


toka 2017 tulipopewa ahadi mpk leo 2019 bado hatujalipwa, et ndio tutegemee ndani ya mwezi watulipe???.........


sina imani!

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom