Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Weeken hii iliopita Freight Forwarders kutoka makampuni tofauti (Nairobi na Mombasa) wametuma wajumbe kwa farmiliarization tour kutembelea Naivasha ICD kuangalia kama dry port iko tayari kushughulikia mizigo.. ikiwemo barabara,vifaa ofisi za kukagua mizigo e.g kra,kpa,port health..etc




 

Kwa utaratibu huo uko sahihi kua na stations kubwa samahani mkuu nilizani ni kama huku kwetu tu. Kumbe sikua sahihi hasa masuala ya security. Ila kwa hizo hatua ulizosema unapita hadi upande train basi nina uhakika kuna watu wengi tu hawapendi usumbufu huo hivyo kama kuna usafiri tofauti usiokua na shida zote za hivyo basi wataacha kutumia hizo station na train. Anyway kwa usalama zaidi ni bora security iwe strong.
 
Nope, it is not the same document!
What geza is showing you is a exctract from an updated version of non technical EISA dated August 2019. On the other hand all of your arguments are based on an old draft EISA document dated 2019.

We have been telling you that, the initial documents on Yapi's site were not final. I guess now you will start to listen...
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Here is the so called new updated document






And here is the so called old ESIA report that I have been using






Now, can you tell me what the new document is saying that the old one didn't already say!?
 
Just FYI there is also an updated version of the ESIA report.

... Now comming back to your question, the difference btwn the 2 set of reports is a section detailing how TANESCO will be involved in building and running the SGR TL and the description of the TL as an associated facility to the project as per the IFC. You will find that particular description at the footnote of the updated report....
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Hivi ni vitu hawezijua upeo wake mdogo sana!
 
Discuss Issues like you mean to discuss them, not try to drag the topic by not saying anything substatial... Both documents describe what an associated facility is...... But that is not the main issue, the main issue was who was paying for the TL, it is still TANESCO! now do you want to deny that???


Even the old document has all those descriptions


And just incase you aren't caught up with the description of associated facilities even the building and equipping of the train maintenance workshops are associated facilities from Yepi's point of view because they are not part of their contract and they are not responsible for that even though without the Associated Facilities the SGR project would not be viable. One could even say the trains and wagons can also fall under such a definition, the only reason why they are not mentioned as AF is because Yepi works for TRC and TRC has influence over buying and running the trains... Do you want us to count the trains out too when we want to know the total cost of your project?

------
If I understand you correctly, essentially what you are trying to differentiate is that associated facility (I will call it AF) is not supposed to be part of Yepi contract. right? Well that's a matter of what you choose to define as AF within your country... Uganda's TL for their electric SGR is part of the contract cost because they chose to define it as part of the project.....

A good example is like how in Tanzania TANESCO is responsible for generating, Transmitting and Distributing of electricity.... While in Kenya its different... Kengen is the one that builds and owns all power plants, Kentraco is the one that builds and owns transmission lines in Kenya, while Kenya Power KPLC is the one that is responsible for last mile distribution of electricity to homes.... If you want to build a power plant in TZ, you will need just one contract/budget , TANESCO will build the plant, build the transmission line and distribute the power to people, but in Kenya, Kengen will build the plant, sell the power to KPLC and then ask Kentraco to build a high voltage transmission line to bring the power closer to its sub-station so that KPLC can distribute the power to homes...{KPLC will pay Kengen and Kengen will pay Kentraco for using its TL network even though they are all government companies Kenya Power pays KenGen Sh18.5bn in four months} ..... So, if TANESCO was building a new plant.... Transmission lines and distribution lines are just part of the project, but if Kengen was building a new plant, then transmission lines and distribution network are Associated Facilities.
But do you think it would be fair to you if when calculating the costs of building a new power plant in Tz vs Kenya, we should take the cost quoted by TANESCO (which would include everything including TL) VS the cost quoted by Kengen (which excludes the costs of other associated facilities e.g TL, substations, Transformers etc) ???? The right comparizon would be to compare the cost quoted by TANESCO VS cost quoted by (Kengen+Kentraco+ KPLC ) for the same project...

I hope you got the point.
 
a reason unit cost of electricity is way high! And nothing to show about in comparison to Tanesco that has major projects aside HP btn Tanzania n Uganda there is one btn Tanzania n Rwanda n Burundi, about 5 Transmission lines aside JNHPP while Kinyerezi phase II n III loading!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…