Evolution?



Haa ahaha haha ahaha

Naona juisi ya pilipili imekuwa kali kupita kiasi. Ndugu yako mfuasi wa Darwin the Racist na mwenye jina kama hilo, kadai kuwa anao ushaidi. Wewe Kang na Pundit mmeshindwa kujibu na kudai eti mimi Max ndio ninayetakiwa kujibu swali. Zaidi ya hapo mmedai kuwa hakuna ushaidi kuwa Mungu hayupo.

Hebu jiangalieni wenyewe jinsi mlivyo changanyikiwa NA KUJIDHARILISHA MBELE YA WATU kama McCain na Palin, kila mtu na jibu lake. Hamjui mnacho amini wala fuata. Biblia yangu inasema wewe Kang na Pundit na Darwin na wengine kama ninyi are FOOLS.

TO DAY I HAVE COME TO A CONCLUTION THAT ALL ATHEIST ARE FOOLS. WAMESHINDWA KUNIJIBU SWALI LANGU LILO KAA KWENYE HII THREAD ZAIDI YA WIKI TATU. WAMESHINDWA KU-SUPPORT IMANI YAO KUWA GOD DOES NOT EXIST.

 
Last edited:


Which is the myth—God or evolution? Louis Bounoure, director of France's Strasbourg Zoological Museum and professor of biology at the University of Strasbourg, stated: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless" (quoted by Federer, p. 61).




 


"For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. In the world around us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of an ordered, structured plan or design . . .

"And we are humbled by the powerful forces at work on a galactic scale, and the purposeful orderliness of nature that endows a tiny and ungainly seed with the ability to develop into a beautiful flower. The better we understand the intricacies of the universe and all it harbors, the more reason we have found to marvel at the inherent design upon which it is based . . .

"To be forced to believe only one conclusion—that everything in the universe happened by chance—would violate the very objectivity of science itself. Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system of the human eye?

"Some people say that science has been unable to prove the existence of a Designer. They admit that many of the miracles in the world around us are hard to understand, and they do not deny that the universe, as modern science sees it, is indeed a far more wondrous thing than the creation medieval man could perceive. But they still maintain that since science has provided us with so many answers the day will soon arrive when we will be able to understand even the fundamental laws of nature without a Divine intent. They challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun? . . .

"What strange rationale makes some physicists accept the inconceivable electron as real while refusing to accept the reality of a Designer on the ground that they cannot conceive of Him?" (quoted by Scott Huse, The Collapse of Evolution, 1997, pp. 159-160).

 


Max Shimba, hivi hujui kwamba hakuna kati ya hawa Atheists anayeweza kukujibu wala hakuna mwenye jibu la swali lako.

Hawa jamaa wote ni wafuata mkumbo.

Darwin hana hoja wala nini. Pundit ndio kabisaaaa. Kang maneno matupu yasio na nguvu wala muelekeo.

Mungu yupo na kama wanabisha basi walete ushaidi tuone. Hakuna atheists mwenye ubavu wala jeuri kukujibu au kusaidia imani yao.



 


Hahaaaaaaaa, I will not go ANYWHERE!!


Well, christian iconography usually picture the ten commandments engraved in [Ketav Ashurit/Classic hebrew] on the tablets.

But, picture this.

We have this Moses/musa-fellow, raised as an Egyptian prince, at least as an Egyptian aristocrat at Pharaoh's court. We may assume that his education involved some literacy. Now the chance that he learned the language of slaves, other than its simplest form to command them, is less than modest.
Remember also that there was no written torah, for the simple reason that Moses/musa had not yet given that to the jews (Whatever they believed instead is beyond my speculation, but it was certainly not torah which just did not exist yet). Consequently, there was not yet the huge amount of Jewish writing and literature, and no rabbi's to teach him.
That reduces the chances he had for Ketav Ashurit/ hebrew literacy even further. Not to mention the fact ht tot 70 Ad jewish religion was an oral tradition.

Now, when the chazzer went up that mountain, some thirteen centuries BC, there even did not even exist a Ketav Ashurit/ Hebrew alphabet. and the traditional Hebrew alphabet came not into existence until long after Moses/musa. Chances seem somewhat better that Moses/musa knew at least some Akkadian, as it seemed to have been a commercial lingua franca, and the court doubtlessly had its mercantile contacts.

But things being as they are, he would probably have read and written Egyptian, learned by and from clerks and priests as an aristocrat at the court should. So, when forced to carving holy shit in stone, he will have used the language that by its nature and origins was reserved for the gods: Egyptian.

Which leaves us with the ten commandments in hieroglyphs.
Isn't that funny!? Hahaaaaa
 
SCHMIDT said:



Darwin hana hoja wala nini.



Click to expand...

Hahaaaa afadhali huyo mwenzako Max ana copy na ku paste
Wewe ndio huna unalojua kabisa.

Mungu hayupo majibu mmeshayapata hapo juu.

Sishindi kwenye net kutafuta copy kwahio ukiona sipo kwa muda ni shughuli lakini sio kumikimbia nyie waongo.
Bible ni kitabu cha hadithi kilichotungwa na baadhi ya wajanja wachache na ndio mnachoamini.
 
Does God exist? Is there proof of God? The following offers candid, straight-forward reasons to believe in the existence of God...


By Marilyn Adamson

Just once wouldn't you love for someone to simply show you the evidence for God's existence? No arm-twisting. No statements of, "You just have to believe." Well, here is an attempt to candidly offer some of the reasons which suggest that God exists.

But first consider this. If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon.

When it comes to the possibility of God's existence, the Bible says that there are people who have seen sufficient evidence, but they have suppressed the truth about God.1 On the other hand, for those who want to know God if he is there, he says, "You will seek me and find me; when you seek me with all your heart, I will be found by you."2 Before you look at the facts surrounding God's existence, ask yourself, If God does exist, would I want to know him? Here then, are some reasons to consider...

1. Does God exist? The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer who not only created our universe, but sustains it today.
Many examples showing God's design could be given, possibly with no end. But here are a few:

The Earth...its size is perfect. The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter.3 Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life.

The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Consider the temperature swings we encounter, roughly -30 degrees to +120 degrees. If the Earth were any further away from the sun, we would all freeze. Any closer and we would burn up. Even a fractional variance in the Earth's position to the sun would make life on Earth impossible. The Earth remains this perfect distance from the sun while it rotates around the sun at a speed of nearly 67,000 mph. It is also rotating on its axis, allowing the entire surface of the Earth to be properly warmed and cooled every day.

And our moon is the perfect size and distance from the Earth for its gravitational pull. The moon creates important ocean tides and movement so ocean waters do not stagnate, and yet our massive oceans are restrained from spilling over across the continents.4

Water...colorless, odorless and without taste, and yet no living thing can survive without it. Plants, animals and human beings consist mostly of water (about two-thirds of the human body is water). You'll see why the characteristics of water are uniquely suited to life:

It has an unusually high boiling point and freezing point. Water allows us to live in an environment of fluctuating temperature changes, while keeping our bodies a steady 98.6 degrees.

Water is a universal solvent. This property of water means that thousands of chemicals, minerals and nutrients can be carried throughout our bodies and into the smallest blood vessels.5

Water is also chemically neutral. Without affecting the makeup of the substances it carries, water enables food, medicines and minerals to be absorbed and used by the body.

Water has a unique surface tension. Water in plants can therefore flow upward against gravity, bringing life-giving water and nutrients to the top of even the tallest trees.

Water freezes from the top down and floats, so fish can live in the winter.

Ninety-seven percent of the Earth's water is in the oceans. But on our Earth, there is a system designed which removes salt from the water and then distributes that water throughout the globe. Evaporation takes the ocean waters, leaving the salt, and forms clouds which are easily moved by the wind to disperse water over the land, for vegetation, animals and people. It is a system of purification and supply that sustains life on this planet, a system of recycled and reused water.6

2. Does God exist? The human brain's complexity shows a higher intelligence behind it.
The human brain...simultaneously processes an amazing amount of information. Your brain takes in all the colors and objects you see, the temperature around you, the pressure of your feet against the floor, the sounds around you, the dryness of your mouth, even the texture of your keyboard. Your brain holds and processes all your emotions, thoughts and memories. At the same time your brain keeps track of the ongoing functions of your body like your breathing pattern, eyelid movement, hunger and movement of the muscles in your hands.

The human brain processes more than a million messages a second.7 Your brain weighs the importance of all this data, filtering out the relatively unimportant. This screening function is what allows you to focus and operate effectively in your world. A brain that deals with more than a million pieces of information every second, while evaluating its importance and allowing you to act on the most pertinent information... did it come about just by chance? Was it merely biological causes, perfectly forming the right tissue, blood flow, neurons, structure? The brain functions differently than other organs. There is an intelligence to it, the ability to reason, to produce feelings, to dream and plan, to take action, and relate to other people. How does one explain the human brain?

3. Does God exist? "Chance" or "natural causes" are insufficient explanations.
The alternative to God existing is that all that exists around us came about by natural cause and random chance. If someone is rolling dice, the odds of rolling a pair of sixes is one thing. But the odds of spots appearing on blank dice is something else. What Pasteur attempted to prove centuries ago, science confirms, that life cannot arise from non-life. Where did human, animal, plant life come from?

Also, natural causes are an inadequate explanation for the amount of precise information contained in human DNA. A person who discounts God is left with the conclusion that all of this came about without cause, without design, and is merely good fortune. It is intellectually wanting to observe intricate design and attribute it to luck.

4. Does God exist? To state with certainty that there is no God, a person has to ignore the passion of an enormously vast number of people who are convinced that there is a God.
This is not to say that if enough people believe something it is therefore true. Scientists, for example, have discovered new truths about the universe which overruled previous conclusions. But as science has progressed, no scientific discovery has countered the numerical likelihood of an intelligent mind being behind it all. In fact, the more science discovers about human life and the universe, the more complex and precisely designed we realize these to be. Rather than pointing away from God, evidence mounts further toward an intelligent source. But objective evidence is not all.

There is a much larger issue. Throughout history, billions of people in the world have attested to their firm, core convictions about God's existence -- arrived at from their subjective, personal relationship with God. Millions today could give detailed account of their experience with God. They would point to answered prayer and specific, amazing ways God has met their needs, and guided them through important personal decisions. They would offer, not only a description of their beliefs, but detailed reports of God's actions in their lives. Many are sure that a loving God exists and has shown himself to be faithful to them. If you are a skeptic, can you say with certainty: "I am absolutely right and they all are wrong about God"?

5. Does God exist? We know God exists because he pursues us. He is constantly initiating and seeking for us to come to him.
I was an atheist at one time. And like most atheists, the issue of people believing in God bothered me greatly. What is it about atheists that we would spend so much time, attention, and energy refuting something that we don't believe even exists?! What causes us to do that? When I was an atheist, I attributed my intentions as caring for those poor, delusional people...to help them realize their hope was completely ill-founded. To be honest, I also had another motive. As I challenged those who believed in God, I was deeply curious to see if they could convince me otherwise. Part of my quest was to become free from the question of God. If I could conclusively prove to believers that they were wrong, then the issue is off the table, and I would be free to go about my life.

I didn't realize that the reason the topic of God weighed so heavily on my mind, was because God was pressing the issue. I have come to find out that God wants to be known. He created us with the intention that we would know him. He has surrounded us with evidence of himself and he keeps the question of his existence squarely before us. It was as if I couldn't escape thinking about the possibility of God. In fact, the day I chose to acknowledge God's existence, my prayer began with, "Ok, you win..." It might be that the underlying reason atheists are bothered by people believing in God is because God is actively pursuing them.

I am not the only one who has experienced this. Malcolm Muggeridge, socialist and philosophical author, wrote, "I had a notion that somehow, besides questing, I was being pursued." C.S. Lewis said he remembered, "...night after night, feeling whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet. I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all of England."

Lewis went on to write a book titled, "Surprised by Joy" as a result of knowing God. I too had no expectations other than rightfully admitting God's existence. Yet over the following several months, I became amazed by his love for me.

6. Does God exist? Unlike any other revelation of God, Jesus Christ is the clearest, most specific picture of God pursuing us.
Why Jesus? Look throughout the major world religions and you'll find that Buddha, Muhammad, Confucius and Moses all identified themselves as teachers or prophets. None of them ever claimed to be equal to God. Surprisingly, Jesus did. That is what sets Jesus apart from all the others. He said God exists and you're looking at him. Though he talked about his Father in heaven, it was not from the position of separation, but of very close union, unique to all humankind. Jesus said that anyone who had seen Him had seen the Father, anyone who believed in him, believed in the Father.

He said, "I am the light of the world, he who follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."8 He claimed attributes belonging only to God: to be able to forgive people of their sin, free them from habits of sin, give people a more abundant life and give them eternal life in heaven. Unlike other teachers who focused people on their words, Jesus pointed people to himself. He did not say, "follow my words and you will find truth." He said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father but through me."9

What proof did Jesus give for claiming to be divine? He did what people can't do. Jesus performed miracles. He healed people...blind, crippled, deaf, even raised a couple of people from the dead. He had power over objects...created food out of thin air, enough to feed crowds of several thousand people. He performed miracles over nature...walked on top of a lake, commanding a raging storm to stop for some friends. People everywhere followed Jesus, because he constantly met their needs, doing the miraculous. He said if you do not want to believe what I'm telling you, you should at least believe in me based on the miracles you're seeing.10

Jesus Christ showed God to be gentle, loving, aware of our self-centeredness and shortcomings, yet deeply wanting a relationship with us. Jesus revealed that although God views us as sinners, worthy of his punishment, his love for us ruled and God came up with a different plan. God himself took on the form of man and accepted the punishment for our sin on our behalf. Sounds ludicrous? Perhaps, but many loving fathers would gladly trade places with their child in a cancer ward if they could. The Bible says that the reason we would love God is because he first loved us.

Jesus died in our place so we could be forgiven. Of all the religions known to humanity, only through Jesus will you see God reaching toward humanity, providing a way for us to have a relationship with him. Jesus proves a divine heart of love, meeting our needs, drawing us to himself. Because of Jesus' death and resurrection, he offers us a new life today. We can be forgiven, fully accepted by God and genuinely loved by God. He says, "I have loved you with an everlasting love, therefore I have continued my faithfulness to you."11 This is God, in action.

Does God exist? If you want to know, investigate Jesus Christ. We're told that "God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."12

God does not force us to believe in him, though he could. Instead, he has provided sufficient proof of his existence for us to willingly respond to him. The earth's perfect distance from the sun, the unique chemical properties of water, the human brain, DNA, the number of people who attest to knowing God, the gnawing in our hearts and minds to determine if God is there, the willingness for God to be known through Jesus Christ. If you need to know more about Jesus and reasons to believe in him, please see: Beyond Blind Faith.

If you want to begin a relationship with God now, you can.
This is your decision, no coercion here. But if you want to be forgiven by God and come into a relationship with him, you can do so right now by asking him to forgive you and come into your life. Jesus said, "Behold, I stand at the door [of your heart] and knock. He who hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into him [or her]."13 If you want to do this, but aren't sure how to put it into words, this may help: "Jesus, thank you for dying for my sins. You know my life and that I need to be forgiven. I ask you to forgive me right now and come into my life. I want to know you in a real way. Come into my life now. Thank you that you wanted a relationship with me. Amen."

God views your relationship with him as permanent. Referring to all those who believe in him, Jesus Christ said of us, "I know them, and they follow me; and I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish, and no one shall snatch them out of my hand."14

So, does God exist? Looking at all these facts, one can conclude that a loving God does exist and can be known in an intimate, personal way. If you need more information about Jesus' claim to divinity, or about God's existence, or if you have similar important questions, please email us.



About the Author: As a former atheist, Marilyn Adamson found it difficult to refute the continuously answered prayers and quality of life of a close friend. In challenging the beliefs of her friend, Marilyn was amazed to learn the wealth of objective evidence pointing to the existence of God. After about a year of persistent questioning, she responded to God's offer to come into her life and has found faith in Him to be constantly substantiated and greatly rewarding.
 


Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaa ukishajua kwamba lugha iliyotumika kuandika amri kumi za Mungu ilikua haipo wakati huo basi umeshajua kwamba kila kitu ni hadithi za popobawa.

Haiwezekani amri kumi za Mungu zitolewe baada ya Musa keshafariki karne za miaka.

Ina maana Musa ndie aliyetangulia na baadae zikaja amri kumi za Mungu?

Unakopi kitu hata kukijua ukweli wake!!!! Hahahaaaa
 
Can Evolution Explain Our Origins?

Atheists often characterise arguments for God's existence as "God-of-the-gaps" arguments. By this they mean that God is invoked to explain the otherwise inexplicable, to bridge the gap between what we can understand about the world and what we in fact see around us.

As a counter to such arguments, atheists tend to invoke modern science. Science, they say, can now explain all those things that were previously taken to support belief in God. We no longer need to invoke God as an explanation of them; the explanatory gap has been closed.

One example of this concerns the question of our origins. The argument from design argues that the only adequate explanation of how we got here is that there is a God that created us. Some forms of the argument support this suggestion by looking at human biology.

Consider the complexity of the human eye, for example. Some have thought that the eye is no less clearly a product of intelligent design than a machine like a watch. Its complex parts work together in harmony to some purpose; it must, therefore, have been created for that purpose by God.

Atheists often respond to such arguments as this by citing evolution theory. Evolution theory, they say, can fully explain the appearance of design in the world around us. There is no longer any need to look to religion for an answer to the question of our origins.

Evolution Theory
The explanation of the origin of life offered by evolution theory is roughly this:

Once upon a time, there was no life. By chance, there came to be simple organisms capable of replicating themselves. Random mutations introduced variety into the population of these organisms, with the result that some of them were better able to survive and replicate themselves than others. A scarcity of the resources necessary for these organisms to survive and reproduce introduced competition between them. Those least fit for competition were unable to secure the resources that they needed, and so died without reproducing.

Those best able to compete multiplied, with random mutations again introducing further variety. As this process was repeated, the organisms developed on an upward curve: each round of mutations introduced better organisms, and each round of competition killed off the weaker organisms. We are the result of the repetition of this process over millions of years.

Irreducible Complexity
Perhaps the most important Creationist response to this has been to appeal to irreducible complexity. An organism is irreducibly complex if taking away some of its parts doesn't just make it work a little worse, but makes it not work at all.

An illustration of irreducible complexity is a mouse trap. A mouse trap consists of several elements: a flat platform, a spring, a trigger, an arm, and some cheese. A mouse trap with all of these elements will work well. A mouse trap that lacks any one of these elements, though, won't just not work well, it won't work at all.

If there is no platform to which the other elements can be attached, then the mouse can grab the cheese from the unassembled mouse trap with impunity. If there is no spring, then the mouse will set off the trap, but the arm won't snap down on it. If there is no trigger, then the mouse can grab the cheese without setting off the trap. If there is no arm, then it doesn't matter that the mouse sets off the trap. If there is no cheese, then the mouse won't go anywhere near the trap. To have a mouse trap that functions at all, then, you need every one of these elements; if you're missing any of them then it just won't work.

Evolution theory holds that we have evolved incrementally over time, gradually changing from one state that works to another state that works better. If evolution theory is true, therefore, then there must be a succession of states, each of which allows us to survive, through which we have evolved on an upward curve.

This, though, doesn't seem to be the case; we seem to be irreducibly complex. To illustrate (actual examples are a bit more complex than this): think of the organs that make human beings work, our hearts, lungs, stomachs, brains, etc. A human being that lacks any of these won't just have less survival value than one with all of them; it won't have any survival value at all. A human being without a heart is a dead human being, as is one without either lungs, or a stomach, or a brain. We therefore can't have incrementally acquired these things, first getting one, then another, and so on; we must have acquired them all at once. That, though, isn't evolution. Evolution is a gradual process.

Evolution, then, cannot explain the origin of irreducibly complex biological organisms. If (and that's a big "if") we are such organisms, then there must be more to how we got here than evolution.

Evolution and Consciousness
A second problem for evolution theory is that of explaining the origin of consciousness. Human beings are not just physical systems; we have rich mental lives. There is more to this mentality than electrical events in the brain. For any mental state, there is a physical event (what is going on in the brain) and a mental event (what that feels like for us). The two are, at least in principle separable; there's no logical contradiction in having one without the other.

The process of natural selection selects organisms for survival based only on their behaviour, on what they do. An organism that behaves as we behave but which does not have the attendant mental states that we have will have just as much survival value as we do. Mentality is not necessary for behaviour, and nothing more than behaviour is necessary for survival, so there is no survival value to having mental states.

Evolution theory, though, can only explain the origin of traits that have survival value. For example, we have two eyes rather than one, according to evolution theory, because that makes it possible to judge distances more accurately, increasing our chances of survival. Consciousness, though, does not increase our chances of survival; we are no more likely to survive than we would be if physical events in our brain did not give rise to conscious experiences, if our decisions just happened automatically as in a computer.

Evolution theory, therefore, cannot explain the origin of consciousness.

Evolution and Chance
Let's set those problems aside for a moment, though, and suppose that evolution theory can explain how complex biological organisms could arise on this planet. Does this solve the mystery of how we in fact did come to be here? Arguably not. It is sometimes argued that even given the coherence of evolution theory, it is still highly unlikely that unguided natural processes would give rise to life in the time-frame that evolution theorists say that this has happened.

Life on Earth is phenomenally complex. Given the degree of complexity that it exhibits, it is claimed, there simply hasn't been enough time for it to be likely to arise through evolutionary processes. Even if it were possible for life to come from non-life via a process of evolution, according to this view we would not expect it to have done so yet. If life evolved, then it is therefore likely that its evolution was not random, but rather was guided by God's hand.

It is thus argued that unless we introduce God evolution theory is inadequate as an explanation of our origins, that natural selection won't work as an explanation on its own.

Prerequisites for Evolution
The main reason, however, that evolution theory cannot provide a full explanation of our origins, is that it can't take us right back to the beginning of the story. In order for evolutionary processes to get going, a lot of things must already be the case. For example: there must be biological organisms; there must be an environment capable of supporting them; they must be capable of reproduction; random mutations must introduce variety.

How did these things come to be the case? Where did these simple organisms capable of reproduction come from? Why do we have an environment capable of supporting life? Evolution theory cannot provide an answer to these questions, because evolutionary processes cannot occur until these conditions are met. Evolution theory therefore cannot provide a full explanation of the origins of life.

This makes it possible to reformulate the argument from design in a way that renders it immune to evolutionary critiques, making the question of whether evolution theory is plausible irrelevant to the question as to whether design arguments are successful. Modern design arguments begin not with biology and the marks as design in biological organisms, but with physics and the way in which the laws of nature are fine-tuned to make life possible.

The are many marks of intelligent design in the laws of nature. The various physical constants such as the weak force and the strong force must have very specific values in order for life to be possible; they do. The Big Bang, if that is how the universe began, had to involve a very specific amount of energy in order for life to be possible; if it happened, then it did involve that amount of energy. These and other features of the universe make it appear that it was designed with life in mind.

Evolution theory simply cannot explain why we have a universe that is fine-tuned to support life, because the laws of nature have not evolved. The argument from design therefore survives the evolutionary critique; evolution cannot explain our origins.

source: Can Evolution Explain Our Origins?
 

We're still leaving out the question of who designed the designer, and how we can explain the obvious changes that do occur in species based on their environment (new generations of birds that have larger beeks after a period of drought in their habitat so they can break open bigger seeds, but smaller beeks after a wet period etc.)

I hoped simple logic would be enough. There is no logic necessity for the existence of a god as cause for anything. Causality itself is only a hypothesis (though a very strong one, and so powerful it is generally treated as a matter-of-fact).
Scientists actually can experimentally observe something coming from nothing.
 

That is adaptability and not evolution


Give me examples of the experiments

And explain to me this statement - 'Evolution theory, therefore, cannot explain the origin of consciousness'

A simple logic then, if evolution theory was 100% true, why would human beings then struggle to make sure their environment is being made better and better by their efforts and not wait for nature to make it for them....The best explaination would be, we as human beings have that part/nature of the Intelligent designer (GOD) in us to design and willingly He gave it to us.
 
I'm sorry, but no, they don't create anything! And they begin with nothing.

They observe. And they observe spontaneous appearance and disappearance of particles.
It is an essential proposition of quantum physics that is doesn't do anything but observe and observe only. And their observations confirm hypotheses on what they should see. And the particles they observe are mathematically defined (otherwise they could impossibly have been predicted by theory). Actually even the slightest attempt to manipulate the event to be observed, would prevent the event according to the theory.

The only thing the experiment does is creating circumstances that facilitate observation. Just as a microscope or an Hubble telescope facilitates observation. They don't influence the observed object or event, and what is manipulated is the mere machinery (i.e. the particle accelerator (or telescope, or microscope) accelerating other particles than the observed).

Again
who designed the designer?
 
deny_all said:
The best explaination would be, we as human beings have that part/nature of the Intelligent designer (GOD) in us to design and willingly He gave it to us.
Click to expand...

Again

We might then as well ask where that god of yours or others came from. And where that came from etc. ad infinitum.
 
Tafuta copy na u paste naenda kulala kesho au keshokutwa tutaendelea.
 

Like the experiment which is being conducted at CERN? .....but they do inject electrons from hydrogen as source, which means the experiment is not from nothing.

Again
who designed the designer?
Click to expand...

And who designed the environment, conditions and organisms for evolution to take place in the first place as per your theory?
 
Darwin said:
Again

We might then as well ask where that god of yours or others came from. And where that came from etc. ad infinitum.
Click to expand...

Nikuulize wewe zaidi where all these things we see in the world came from if not from the Mighty one.

Why wouldn't the theories of evolution be proved scientifically after all these years if they were that true, by setting up a lab experiment and hoping by chance life can start and evolve.
 
Some Intelligence..
Over 90% of the species that have ever existed on earth are now extinct... nice design!

Genetic evidence shows that the human species was down to a couple of thousand, and we could have easily joined the extinct ranks... fantastic design!

The sun will in one day collapse on itself burning us all to a crisp! ..great design!

The human body can be attacked and destroyed by the tinniest of micro-organism! ... fantastic design!!!

The human body has completely useless "vestigial" structures such as the appendix. ...Marvelous designer!!!


How come no one mentions these little facts when they are talking about our perfect creator?
 
Kang naona umeua kila kitu!!!

Deny all umechokoza nyuki!! Haaaaaahaaaa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…