Mbuku Kyandi
New Member
- Feb 21, 2013
- 1
- 0
:nono: DISCOVERED DISCREPANCIES IN THE RECENT NEW TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT ANNOUNCEMENT
(2012/2013) PUBLISHED IN THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING WEBSITE :nono:
The following are the major areas of noticeable discrepancies:
1. New Employed teachers statistics do not match
[TD="align: right"] 26,537
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]13,568
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]8,887
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]4,086
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 26,541
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] +4
[/TD]
2. Self-Contradictory Statement
Your good statement orders all in-service graduands to go back to their previous duty stations. However, a simple analysis reveals that a teacher whose entry is numbered 252 an in-service at one of Temeke Manicipal Primary School, has been posted to Moshi (Rural). Is it not a contradiction?
3. Violation of Standards
It was announced earlier in 2010 that from 2012 henceforth, no teacher who failed in any subject would be posted to a new duty station until he/she passes the failed subject(s) in the subsequent sitting. However, a simple analysis reveals that two graduands with post entry numbered 2483 in the list (who failed in 2 subjects) and another with post entry numbered 1693, both have been posted to Kyela and Mbeya City Municipalilties respectively. What a gross misconduct?
Recommendations!
Being a stakeholder, though third party to this recent announcement, I have been aggrieved by such discrepancies. It is unethical to grant a post to a teacher who failed in 2 subjects while dropping another who failed in a single subject. This discovery list is not exhaustive; the ministry should expect similar grievances especially after this message is brought into awareness of other stakeholders.
I therefore request the MOEVT to urgently withdraw the records so published, make all necessary corrections and re-publicize a clean list that is unquestionable. A feedback from the ministry should be advanced to the public, so that we can be sure that these queries are being attended.
(2012/2013) PUBLISHED IN THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING WEBSITE :nono:
The following are the major areas of noticeable discrepancies:
1. New Employed teachers statistics do not match
| Total employed | |
| Certificate | |
| Degree | |
| Diploma | |
| Total | |
| Discrepancy | |
[TD="align: right"] 26,537
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]13,568
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]8,887
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]4,086
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 26,541
[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] +4
[/TD]
2. Self-Contradictory Statement
Your good statement orders all in-service graduands to go back to their previous duty stations. However, a simple analysis reveals that a teacher whose entry is numbered 252 an in-service at one of Temeke Manicipal Primary School, has been posted to Moshi (Rural). Is it not a contradiction?
3. Violation of Standards
It was announced earlier in 2010 that from 2012 henceforth, no teacher who failed in any subject would be posted to a new duty station until he/she passes the failed subject(s) in the subsequent sitting. However, a simple analysis reveals that two graduands with post entry numbered 2483 in the list (who failed in 2 subjects) and another with post entry numbered 1693, both have been posted to Kyela and Mbeya City Municipalilties respectively. What a gross misconduct?
Recommendations!
Being a stakeholder, though third party to this recent announcement, I have been aggrieved by such discrepancies. It is unethical to grant a post to a teacher who failed in 2 subjects while dropping another who failed in a single subject. This discovery list is not exhaustive; the ministry should expect similar grievances especially after this message is brought into awareness of other stakeholders.
I therefore request the MOEVT to urgently withdraw the records so published, make all necessary corrections and re-publicize a clean list that is unquestionable. A feedback from the ministry should be advanced to the public, so that we can be sure that these queries are being attended.
