Hukumu ya Gwajima na Silaa: Je, lilikuwa ni tukio la kupangwa?

[sajo]

Taarifa ya Kamati ya haki, maadili na Madaraka ya bunge iliungwa mkono na Spika wa Bunge kabla ya kuanza kujadiliwa na bunge (baada tu ya Mwenyekiti wa kamati kutoa hoja). Tafsiri ni kuwa ilielekeza wabunge nini kinachotakiwa na Spika. Muelekeo ulikuwa ni kuunga mkono hoja na sio vinginevyo.

Uchaguaji wa wabunge waliochangia taarifa ya kamati.
Taarifa ya kamati ilichangiwa na takribani wabunge 10 au 11, kati yao wabunge 8 walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati iliyotoa hoja (iliyowasilisha taarifa). Haieleweki kama walipangwa (waliandaliwa) kuchangia, au wabunge wegine hawakuwa na maslahi (interest) kujadili taarifa au ilitokea tu coincidence kwa Mheshimiwa Spika kuchagua wabunge hao;

Je, ilikuwa sahihi kwa wabunge ambao ni wajumbe wa kamati kujadili taarifa ya kamati yao?
Ukisoma kanuni za bunge za mwaka 2020, zipo kimya, hazijaeleza kuhusu hilo kama wajumbe wa kamati wanaweza kuchangia taarifa ya kamati yao au la. Hata hivyo, mazoea (Good Practice) katika sekta tofauti (ikiwa ni pamoja na Mamlaka za Serikali za Mitaa) ni kuwa wajumbe wa kamati husika huwa hawaruhusiwi kuijadili taarifa ya kamati yao baada ya kuwasilishwa isipokuwa wajibu wao ni kuitolea ufafanuzi pale wajumbe wasio wanakamati wanapohoji. Kilichofanyika bungeni jana ilikuwa ni kwenda kinyume na good practice kwani karibu asilimia 80 ya waliochangia taarifa walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati. Madhara ya wajumbe kujadili taarifa yao wenyewe ni kuwa na majibu tegemewa (expected answers), kwamba isingewezekana kwa wajumbe hao kujadili tofauti na kilichowasilishwa na wao wenyewe (hoja iliyopo mezani) maana ingekuwa ni kujikata mitama. Kwa mazingira haya ni rahisi kuhitimisha kuwa azimio la bunge la tarehe 31 Agosti 2021 lilikuwa ni la kupangwa.​

 

[utah jazz]

Uonevu tu ndugu yangu

 

[Intelligence Justice]

Taarifa ya Kamati ya haki, maadili na Madaraka ya bunge iliungwa mkono na Spika wa Bunge kabla ya kuanza kujadiliwa na bunge (baada tu ya Mwenyekiti wa kamati kutoa hoja). Tafsiri ni kuwa ilielekeza wabunge nini kinachotakiwa na Spika. Muelekeo ulikuwa ni kuunga mkono hoja na sio vinginevyo.

Uchaguaji wa wabunge waliochangia taarifa ya kamati.
Taarifa ya kamati ilichangiwa na takribani wabunge 10 au 11, kati yao wabunge 8 walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati iliyotoa hoja (iliyowasilisha taarifa). Haieleweki kama walipangwa (waliandaliwa) kuchangia, au wabunge wegine hawakuwa na maslahi (interest) kujadili taarifa au ilitokea tu coincidence kwa Mheshimiwa Spika kuchagua wabunge hao;

Je, ilikuwa sahihi kwa wabunge ambao ni wajumbe wa kamati kujadili taarifa ya kamati yao?
Ukisoma kanuni za bunge za mwaka 2020, zipo kimya, hazijaeleza kuhusu hilo kama wajumbe wa kamati wanaweza kuchangia taarifa ya kamati yao au la. Hata hivyo, mazoea (Good Practice) katika sekta tofauti (ikiwa ni pamoja na Mamlaka za Serikali za Mitaa) ni kuwa wajumbe wa kamati husika huwa hawaruhusiwi kuijadili taarifa ya kamati yao baada ya kuwasilishwa isipokuwa wajibu wao ni kuitolea ufafanuzi pale wajumbe wasio wanakamati wanapohoji. Kilichofanyika bungeni jana ilikuwa ni kwenda kinyume na good practice kwani karibu asilimia 80 ya waliochangia taarifa walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati. Madhara ya wajumbe kujadili taarifa yao wenyewe ni kuwa na majibu tegemewa (expected answers), kwamba isingewezekana kwa wajumbe hao kujadili tofauti na kilichowasilishwa na wao wenyewe (hoja iliyopo mezani) maana ingekuwa ni kujikata mitama. Kwa mazingira haya ni rahisi kuhitimisha kuwa azimio la bunge la tarehe 31 Agosti 2021 lilikuwa ni la kupangwa.​

Ndio kwa minajili ya kuwatisha watu wengine wenye misimamo kama wao ili warudi nyuma kwa uoga lakini ndio limechochea moto wa petroli usipime kuanzia mkubwa hadi mdogo wanasubiri mkubwa mmoja ajichanganye na apongeze hadharani kwa kilichofanyika hapo ndipo atakapojua wananchi kwa sasa 'are fedup and lost'

 

[Warue]

Wabunge waliochanja ni wangapi??

 

[sajo]

Ndio kwa minajili ya kuwatisha watu wengine wenye misimamo kama wao ili warudi nyuma kwa uoga lakini ndio limechochea moto wa petroli usipime kuanzia mkubwa hadi mdogo wanasubiri mkubwa mmoja ajichanganye na apongeze hadharani kwa kilichofanyika hapo ndipo atakapojua wananchi kwa sasa 'are fedup and lost'

Spika alikuwa anaongea huku anajihami akijua kuwa wahanga lazima wajibu mapigo. Akasema najua kijana (Slaa) atajibu jibu huko mitaani maana ndiyo njia aliyochagua kuitumia.

Gwajima akiendelea huko tutawafikisha mbele ya kamati waziri wa mambo ya ndani au IGP nk

 

[Dreadnought]

Kama wao wana msimamo huo dhidi ya chanjo kwa nini watumie nguvu nyingi kuwashawishi wengine?

Wanafikia hatua ya kuwakejeli wakubwa wao sidhani kama ni sahihi.

 

[The Palm Tree]

Taarifa ya Kamati ya haki, maadili na Madaraka ya bunge iliungwa mkono na Spika wa Bunge kabla ya kuanza kujadiliwa na bunge (baada tu ya Mwenyekiti wa kamati kutoa hoja). Tafsiri ni kuwa ilielekeza wabunge nini kinachotakiwa na Spika. Muelekeo ulikuwa ni kuunga mkono hoja na sio vinginevyo.

Uchaguaji wa wabunge waliochangia taarifa ya kamati.
Taarifa ya kamati ilichangiwa na takribani wabunge 10 au 11, kati yao wabunge 8 walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati iliyotoa hoja (iliyowasilisha taarifa). Haieleweki kama walipangwa (waliandaliwa) kuchangia, au wabunge wegine hawakuwa na maslahi (interest) kujadili taarifa au ilitokea tu coincidence kwa Mheshimiwa Spika kuchagua wabunge hao;

Je, ilikuwa sahihi kwa wabunge ambao ni wajumbe wa kamati kujadili taarifa ya kamati yao?
Ukisoma kanuni za bunge za mwaka 2020, zipo kimya, hazijaeleza kuhusu hilo kama wajumbe wa kamati wanaweza kuchangia taarifa ya kamati yao au la. Hata hivyo, mazoea (Good Practice) katika sekta tofauti (ikiwa ni pamoja na Mamlaka za Serikali za Mitaa) ni kuwa wajumbe wa kamati husika huwa hawaruhusiwi kuijadili taarifa ya kamati yao baada ya kuwasilishwa isipokuwa wajibu wao ni kuitolea ufafanuzi pale wajumbe wasio wanakamati wanapohoji. Kilichofanyika bungeni jana ilikuwa ni kwenda kinyume na good practice kwani karibu asilimia 80 ya waliochangia taarifa walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati. Madhara ya wajumbe kujadili taarifa yao wenyewe ni kuwa na majibu tegemewa (expected answers), kwamba isingewezekana kwa wajumbe hao kujadili tofauti na kilichowasilishwa na wao wenyewe (hoja iliyopo mezani) maana ingekuwa ni kujikata mitama. Kwa mazingira haya ni rahisi kuhitimisha kuwa azimio la bunge la tarehe 31 Agosti 2021 lilikuwa ni la kupangwa.​

ABSOLUTELY, Yes. Lilikuwa la kupangwa na nionavyo mimi ni kwa sababu zifuatazo;

1. Ishu ya mbunge Jerry Silaa (Ukonga) inagusa maslahi ya wabunge moja kwa moja. Hawakupenda na milele wasingependa maslahi yao yahojiwe au kuguswa. Kwa hiyo ili kujilinda ilikuwa ni lazima wamwadhibu Jerry Silaa (kama intimidation kwa wengine) tena kwa namna ya kumtukana na kumdhalilisha na ignorantly na kwa makusufi wakaacha kujibu hoja na concern ya wananchi ya kwanini kodi nyingi na za kinyonyaji hivi kwa sasa....!!??

2. Kwa ishu ya Mch. Gwajima, hiyo ni vita ya ulimwengu wa roho wanadamu wakiwa ndiyo uwanja wa mapambano...

Gwajima anawakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa Mungu/mbinguni chini ya mfalme wa wafalme Yesu Kristo na wabunge/bunge/serikali wakiwakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa ulimwengu huu chini ya mfalme wake Ibilisi/shetani...

This was expected kwa sababu Mch. Josephat Gwajima ameingia na kugusa ikulu ya shetani kwa kuupinga mpango wake wa kuangamiza wanadamu kwa kitu hiki kinachoitwa chanjo ya UVIKO 19...

Na kwa sababu hii ni vita kali na ngumu sana na wanaoweza kupigana ni watu aina ya Mch. Gwajima tu. Inashangaza badala ya kuwaunga mkono, tunageuza silaha zetu kuwapiga wao. This is typical devil's strategy...!!

Ni Bahati mbaya tu kuwa wabunge na serikali yetu hii chini ya Rais Samia Suluhu Hassan inatumiwa kueneza agenda na mipango ya shetani bila hawa masikini wa ufahamu kujua...!!

3. Ukichunguza kwa makini, utagundua kuwa wabunge karibu wote wanaujua ukweli kuwa wanakwepa kodi kwa pesa wanazojilipa kwa kuziita "posho" ili tu zisikatwe kodi..!!

Hebu jaribu kufukiri, inawezekanaje malipo ya takribani TZS 13,000,000 kwa mwezi kwa mbunge mmoja, eti TZS 9,000,000 yote iitwe "posho" huku 4,000,000 pekee ndiyo iwe mshahara unakatwa kodi ya PAYE halafu wakati huohuo wakitutungia sisi wananchi sheria kandamizi na za kinyonyaji za kodi kama hii ya tozo za simu...?

Hawa wabunge wanajua kabisa kuwa kuna Watanzania wana kipato cha mshahara wa TZS 400,000 tu kwa mwezi na kinakatwa kodi lakini wao 9,000,000 yote hawataki kulipia Kodi..!!

Is it fair so far?

Kwa hiyo, mpaka hapo hawa wabunge na Spika wao Ndugai wanajua kuwa ndugu zao hawa (Gwajima na Silaa) wameonewa tu. Hii ni mbaya sana na haifai kabisa...!!

Cha kushangaza eti hata Msukuma na Lusinde walikosekana kwenye ile list ya kujadili mpango wa umbea huu. Sababu ni moja tu, NAFSI ZAO ZINÀWASUTA...!!

4. Lakini ili tupone na ili tufike tunakotakiwa tufike, haya hayana budi kutokea sasa...!!

 

[mwengeso]

ABSOLUTELY, Yes. Lilikuwa la kupangwa na nionavyo mimi ni kwa sababu zifuatazo;
...
3. Lakini ili tupone na ili tufike tunakotakiwa tufike, haya hayana budi kutokea sasa...!!

Yajayo yanafikirisha

 

[Intelligence Justice]

Taarifa ya Kamati ya haki, maadili na Madaraka ya bunge iliungwa mkono na Spika wa Bunge kabla ya kuanza kujadiliwa na bunge (baada tu ya Mwenyekiti wa kamati kutoa hoja). Tafsiri ni kuwa ilielekeza wabunge nini kinachotakiwa na Spika. Muelekeo ulikuwa ni kuunga mkono hoja na sio vinginevyo.

Uchaguaji wa wabunge waliochangia taarifa ya kamati.
Taarifa ya kamati ilichangiwa na takribani wabunge 10 au 11, kati yao wabunge 8 walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati iliyotoa hoja (iliyowasilisha taarifa). Haieleweki kama walipangwa (waliandaliwa) kuchangia, au wabunge wegine hawakuwa na maslahi (interest) kujadili taarifa au ilitokea tu coincidence kwa Mheshimiwa Spika kuchagua wabunge hao;

Je, ilikuwa sahihi kwa wabunge ambao ni wajumbe wa kamati kujadili taarifa ya kamati yao?
Ukisoma kanuni za bunge za mwaka 2020, zipo kimya, hazijaeleza kuhusu hilo kama wajumbe wa kamati wanaweza kuchangia taarifa ya kamati yao au la. Hata hivyo, mazoea (Good Practice) katika sekta tofauti (ikiwa ni pamoja na Mamlaka za Serikali za Mitaa) ni kuwa wajumbe wa kamati husika huwa hawaruhusiwi kuijadili taarifa ya kamati yao baada ya kuwasilishwa isipokuwa wajibu wao ni kuitolea ufafanuzi pale wajumbe wasio wanakamati wanapohoji. Kilichofanyika bungeni jana ilikuwa ni kwenda kinyume na good practice kwani karibu asilimia 80 ya waliochangia taarifa walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati. Madhara ya wajumbe kujadili taarifa yao wenyewe ni kuwa na majibu tegemewa (expected answers), kwamba isingewezekana kwa wajumbe hao kujadili tofauti na kilichowasilishwa na wao wenyewe (hoja iliyopo mezani) maana ingekuwa ni kujikata mitama. Kwa mazingira haya ni rahisi kuhitimisha kuwa azimio la bunge la tarehe 31 Agosti 2021 lilikuwa ni la kupangwa.​

Biases That Impact Decision Making on the Facts Findings

• Similarity Bias: Preferring to hear, see, touch, smell or feel things of our favorite over things that are different from our concept
• Expedience Bias: Preferring to acting quickly to defend from blame without taking time seeking clarity and understanding the authenticity of the information sources. Time pressure is a barrier to the right, fair and justifiable decision-making.
• Experience Bias: Overlooking considering in reality that your truth that you have or know is not always the only option to resolve the problem that causes a dispute between two or more counterparts; it is vital to understand that each individual contributes their own value to the decision which needs to be respected
• Distance Bias: It is instinct to prioritize things that are nearby, such as physical space, time, or other domains. This could appear when individuals look to the guidance of those currently present in a meeting, rather than those who are working remotely
• Safety Bias: The human tendency to avoid loss, often causing a slowdown of decision making and avoidance of health risks.
• Confirmation bias: This bias occurs when decision-makers seek out evidence that confirms their previously held beliefs while discounting or diminishing the impact of evidence in support of differing conclusions.
• Halo effect Bias: This is an observer’s overall impression of a person, company, brand, or product, and it influences the observer’s feelings and thoughts about that entity’s overall character or properties. It is the perception, for example, that if someone does well in a certain area, then they will automatically perform well at something else regardless of whether those tasks are related.
• Overconfidence Bias: This bias occurs when a person overestimates the reliability of their judgments. This can include the certainty one feels in her own ability, performance, level of control, or chance of success
• Anchoring Bias: The tendency to rely heavily on the first information you learn when you are evaluating something. In other words, what you learn early in the facts finding often has a greater impact on your judgment than the information you learn later. This is the overreliance on an initial single piece of information or experience to make subsequent judgments. Once an anchor is set, other judgments are made by adjusting away from that anchor, which can limit one’s ability to accurately interpret new, potentially relevant information
• Attentional Bias: In order to survive, animals including human beings have to evade or avoid threats. Multiple of information that blasts the senses daily, people have to spot the ones that might be important for their health, happiness, and safety. This extremely survival skill can become a bias if you begin to focus your attention too much on one kind of information, while you disregard other kinds of information sources with fear to be derailed from the pre-determined concept you believe in.
• Cognitive Bias: can critically affect your decision-making skills, limit your problem-solving abilities, hinder your career success, damage the reliability and credibility of your memories, challenge your ability to respond in crisis situations, increase anxiety and depression, and impair your relationships with others by always acting with inferiority complex suspecting to be undermined
• Self-Serving Bias: This normally happens when something goes wrong in your life, you may tend to blame an external force for causing it. But when something goes wrong in someone’s else life, you might wonder whether that person was somehow to blame, if an internal characteristic or flaw caused the problem
• Optimism Bias: This situation can cause people to believe that is less likely to experience hardships than other people are, and more likely to experience success. Intellectuals have found that whether people are making predictions about their future wealth, relationships, or health, they usually overestimate success and underestimate the likelihood of negative outcomes. That’s because we selectively update our beliefs, adding an update when something turns out well but not as often when things turn out badly. The people do not often like to hear

How To Mitigate The Effects of Biases

The human mind seeks efficiency, which means that much of the reasoning we use to conduct our daily decision-making relies on nearly automatic processing. Cognitive biases are flaws in your thinking that can lead you to draw inaccurate conclusions. They can be harmful because they cause you to focus too much on some kinds of information while overlooking other kinds.
It’s unrealistic to think that you can eliminate cognitive biases, but you can improve your ability to spot the situations where you’ll be vulnerable to them. By learning more about how they work, slowing your decision-making process, collaborating with others, and using objective checklists and processes, you can reduce the chances that cognitive biases will lead you off track.

• Learn. Studying cognitive biases can help you recognize them in your own life and counteract them once you’ve identified them.
• Question. If you’re in a situation where you know you may be disposed to bias, slow your decision-making, and consider expanding the range of reliable sources you consult.
• Collaborate. Assemble a diverse group of contributors with varying areas of expertise and life experience to help you consider possibilities you might otherwise overlook.
• Remain Unreasoning. To cut down on the chances that you’ll be influenced by gender, emotions, perceptions, ideology polarization, extremism, race, or other easily stereotyped considerations, keep yourself and others from accessing the information on those factors.
• Use checklists, algorithms, case studies, research methodology, professional investigative processes, and other objective measures. They may help you focus on relevant factors and reduce the likelihood that you’ll be influenced by irrelevant ones

 

[sajo]

ABSOLUTELY, Yes. Lilikuwa la kupangwa na nionavyo mimi ni kwa sababu zifuatazo;

1. Ishu ya mbunge Jerry Silaa (Ukonga) inagusa maslahi ya wabunge moja kwa moja. Hawakupenda na milele wasingependa maslahi yao yahojiwe au kuguswa. Kwa hiyo ili kujilinda ilikuwa ni lazima wamwadhibu Jerry Silaa (kama intimidation kwa wengine) tena kwa namna ya kumtukana na kumdhalilisha na ignorantly na kwa makusufi wakaacha kujibu hoja na concern ya wananchi ya kwanini kodi nyingi na za kinyonyaji hivi kwa sasa....!!??

2. Kwa ishu ya Mch. Gwajima, hiyo ni vita ya ulimwengu wa roho wanadamu wakiwa ndiyo uwanja wa mapambano...

Gwajima anawakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa Mungu/mbinguni chini ya mfalme wa wafalme Yesu Kristo na wabunge/bunge/serikali wakiwakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa ulimwengu huu chini ya mfalme wake Ibilisi/shetani...

This was expected kwa sababu Mch. Josephat Gwajima ameingia na kugusa ikulu ya shetani kwa kuupinga mpango wake wa kuangamiza wanadamu kwa kitu hiki kinachoitwa chanjo ya UVIKO 19...

Na kwa sababu hii ni vita kali na ngumu sana na wanaoweza kupigana ni watu aina ya Mch. Gwajima tu. Inashangaza badala ya kuwaunga mkono, tunageuza silaha zetu kuwapiga wao. This is typical devil's strategy...!!

Ni Bahati mbaya tu kuwa wabunge na serikali yetu hii chini ya Rais Samia Suluhu Hassan inatumiwa kueneza agenda na mipango ya shetani bila hawa masikini wa ufahamu kujua...!!

3. Ukichunguza kwa makini, utagundua kuwa wabunge karibu wote wanaujua ukweli kuwa wanakwepa kodi kwa pesa wanazojilipa kwa kuziita "posho" ili tu zisikatwe kodi..!!

Hebu jaribu kufukiri, inawezekanaje malipo ya takribani TZS 13,000,000 kwa mwezi kwa mbunge mmoja, eti TZS 9,000,000 yote iitwe "posho" huku 4,000,000 pekee ndiyo iwe mshahara unakatwa kodi ya PAYE halafu wakati huohuo wakitutungia sisi wananchi sheria kandamizi na za kinyonyaji za kodi kama hii ya tozo za simu...?

Hawa wabunge wanajua kabisa kuwa kuna Watanzania wana kipato cha mshahara wa TZS 400,000 tu kwa mwezi na kinakatwa kodi lakini wao 9,000,000 yote hawataki kulipia Kodi..!!

Is it fair so far?

Kwa hiyo, mpaka hapo hawa wabunge na Spika wao Ndugai wanajua kuwa ndugu zao hawa (Gwajima na Silaa) wameonewa tu. Hii ni mbaya sana na haifai kabisa...!!

Cha kushangaza eti hata Msukuma na Lusinde walikosekana kwenye ile list ya kujadili mpango wa umbea huu. Sababu ni moja tu, NAFSI ZAO ZINÀWASUTA...!!

4. Lakini ili tupone na ili tufike tunakotakiwa tufike, haya hayana budi kutokea sasa...!!

Yaani kuthibitisha kuwa wanalinda sana maslahi yao, Sio Mwenyekiti wa Kamati wala wachangiaji wa hoja walioweza kutaja kiwango cha mshahara wa mbunge. Wote walikuwa wanazunguuka na hata kwa Jerry Slaa wakasema amekiri kuwa basic salary inakatwa kodi, hawakutaja basic salary ni shilingi ngapi. Bunge hilohilo huwa linapitisha kwa kutaja wazi viwango vya kima cha chini vya mishahara kwa waajiriwa wa serikali na sekta binafsi, Tshs. 150,000/= serikalini. Hakuna mbunge aliyewahi kuonesha Salary Slip yake (hii ni mpaka kwa wabunge wa upinzani waliokuwpo bunge lililopita na wanalalamikia wabunge wa bunge la sasa). Hakuna mtanzania anayeweza kusema kuwa mshahara wa mbunge exactly ni shilingi kadhaa, imefichwa hivyo watu wamebaki kukisia kisia tu.

Jerry Slaa amesema mshahara wa mbunge haukatwi kodi, Kamati ya Bunge badala ya kuwaita TRA waje kuthibitisha kama wanatoza kodi mshahara hu au la, wao wanamleta mhasibu wa bunge hilohilo linalotuhumiwa kutolipa kodi mishahara, atathibitisha nini huyu?

 

[Niza doyi]

Linapofika swala la maslahi yao hawa wabunge si wa upinzani Wala chama tawala,lao ni moja.
Nilitegemea wabunge was zamani Kama Msigwa,Lema,Lissu wangetolea ufafanuzi juu ya swala la kulipa Kodi, nao Kimia kulikoni?

 

[Benjamini Netanyahu]

Ndugai ni mtu mwenye chuki binafsi sn

 

[koro-boy]

ABSOLUTELY, Yes. Lilikuwa la kupangwa na nionavyo mimi ni kwa sababu zifuatazo;

1. Ishu ya mbunge Jerry Silaa (Ukonga) inagusa maslahi ya wabunge moja kwa moja. Hawakupenda na milele wasingependa maslahi yao yahojiwe au kuguswa. Kwa hiyo ili kujilinda ilikuwa ni lazima wamwadhibu Jerry Silaa (kama intimidation kwa wengine) tena kwa namna ya kumtukana na kumdhalilisha na ignorantly na kwa makusufi wakaacha kujibu hoja na concern ya wananchi ya kwanini kodi nyingi na za kinyonyaji hivi kwa sasa....!!??

2. Kwa ishu ya Mch. Gwajima, hiyo ni vita ya ulimwengu wa roho wanadamu wakiwa ndiyo uwanja wa mapambano...

Gwajima anawakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa Mungu/mbinguni chini ya mfalme wa wafalme Yesu Kristo na wabunge/bunge/serikali wakiwakilisha ulimwengu wa roho ndani ya Ufalme wa ulimwengu huu chini ya mfalme wake Ibilisi/shetani...

This was expected kwa sababu Mch. Josephat Gwajima ameingia na kugusa ikulu ya shetani kwa kuupinga mpango wake wa kuangamiza wanadamu kwa kitu hiki kinachoitwa chanjo ya UVIKO 19...

Na kwa sababu hii ni vita kali na ngumu sana na wanaoweza kupigana ni watu aina ya Mch. Gwajima tu. Inashangaza badala ya kuwaunga mkono, tunageuza silaha zetu kuwapiga wao. This is typical devil's strategy...!!

Ni Bahati mbaya tu kuwa wabunge na serikali yetu hii chini ya Rais Samia Suluhu Hassan inatumiwa kueneza agenda na mipango ya shetani bila hawa masikini wa ufahamu kujua...!!

3. Ukichunguza kwa makini, utagundua kuwa wabunge karibu wote wanaujua ukweli kuwa wanakwepa kodi kwa pesa wanazojilipa kwa kuziita "posho" ili tu zisikatwe kodi..!!

Hebu jaribu kufukiri, inawezekanaje malipo ya takribani TZS 13,000,000 kwa mwezi kwa mbunge mmoja, eti TZS 9,000,000 yote iitwe "posho" huku 4,000,000 pekee ndiyo iwe mshahara unakatwa kodi ya PAYE halafu wakati huohuo wakitutungia sisi wananchi sheria kandamizi na za kinyonyaji za kodi kama hii ya tozo za simu...?

Hawa wabunge wanajua kabisa kuwa kuna Watanzania wana kipato cha mshahara wa TZS 400,000 tu kwa mwezi na kinakatwa kodi lakini wao 9,000,000 yote hawataki kulipia Kodi..!!

Is it fair so far?

Kwa hiyo, mpaka hapo hawa wabunge na Spika wao Ndugai wanajua kuwa ndugu zao hawa (Gwajima na Silaa) wameonewa tu. Hii ni mbaya sana na haifai kabisa...!!

Cha kushangaza eti hata Msukuma na Lusinde walikosekana kwenye ile list ya kujadili mpango wa umbea huu. Sababu ni moja tu, NAFSI ZAO ZINÀWASUTA...!!

4. Lakini ili tupone na ili tufike tunakotakiwa tufike, haya hayana budi kutokea sasa...!!

Ni nani anawakilisha ulimwengu wa Roho? huu ni utapeli mtupo hakuna kitu hapa usipotoshe umma wa watanzania.

 

[sajo]

Linapofika swala la maslahi yao hawa wabunge si wa upinzani Wala chama tawala,lao ni moja.
Nilitegemea wabunge was zamani Kama Msigwa,Lema,Lissu wangetolea ufafanuzi juu ya swala la kulipa Kodi, nao Kimia kulikoni?

Wanawaza uchaguzi ujao, wakifanikiwa kuingia ndani maneno yao yasiwatafune wenyewe

 

[thetallest]

Taarifa ya Kamati ya haki, maadili na Madaraka ya bunge iliungwa mkono na Spika wa Bunge kabla ya kuanza kujadiliwa na bunge (baada tu ya Mwenyekiti wa kamati kutoa hoja). Tafsiri ni kuwa ilielekeza wabunge nini kinachotakiwa na Spika. Muelekeo ulikuwa ni kuunga mkono hoja na sio vinginevyo.

Uchaguaji wa wabunge waliochangia taarifa ya kamati.
Taarifa ya kamati ilichangiwa na takribani wabunge 10 au 11, kati yao wabunge 8 walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati iliyotoa hoja (iliyowasilisha taarifa). Haieleweki kama walipangwa (waliandaliwa) kuchangia, au wabunge wegine hawakuwa na maslahi (interest) kujadili taarifa au ilitokea tu coincidence kwa Mheshimiwa Spika kuchagua wabunge hao;

Je, ilikuwa sahihi kwa wabunge ambao ni wajumbe wa kamati kujadili taarifa ya kamati yao?
Ukisoma kanuni za bunge za mwaka 2020, zipo kimya, hazijaeleza kuhusu hilo kama wajumbe wa kamati wanaweza kuchangia taarifa ya kamati yao au la. Hata hivyo, mazoea (Good Practice) katika sekta tofauti (ikiwa ni pamoja na Mamlaka za Serikali za Mitaa) ni kuwa wajumbe wa kamati husika huwa hawaruhusiwi kuijadili taarifa ya kamati yao baada ya kuwasilishwa isipokuwa wajibu wao ni kuitolea ufafanuzi pale wajumbe wasio wanakamati wanapohoji. Kilichofanyika bungeni jana ilikuwa ni kwenda kinyume na good practice kwani karibu asilimia 80 ya waliochangia taarifa walikuwa ni wajumbe wa kamati. Madhara ya wajumbe kujadili taarifa yao wenyewe ni kuwa na majibu tegemewa (expected answers), kwamba isingewezekana kwa wajumbe hao kujadili tofauti na kilichowasilishwa na wao wenyewe (hoja iliyopo mezani) maana ingekuwa ni kujikata mitama. Kwa mazingira haya ni rahisi kuhitimisha kuwa azimio la bunge la tarehe 31 Agosti 2021 lilikuwa ni la kupangwa.​

Naunga mkono hoja ,ni maamuzi ya kipumbavu,kukomoana na pia bunge limedhalilika mbele ya jamii ya wasomi waliostarabika

 

[Intelligence Justice]

Yaani kuthibitisha kuwa wanalinda sana maslahi yao, Sio Mwenyekiti wa Kamati wala wachangiaji wa hoja walioweza kutaja kiwango cha mshahara wa mbunge. Wote walikuwa wanazunguuka na hata kwa Jerry Slaa wakasema amekiri kuwa basic salary inakatwa kodi, hawakutaja basic salary ni shilingi ngapi. Bunge hilohilo huwa linapitisha kwa kutaja wazi viwango vya kima cha chini vya mishahara kwa waajiriwa wa serikali na sekta binafsi, Tshs. 150,000/= serikalini. Hakuna mbunge aliyewahi kuonesha Salary Slip yake (hii ni mpaka kwa wabunge wa upinzani waliokuwpo bunge lililopita na wanalalamikia wabunge wa bunge la sasa). Hakuna mtanzania anayeweza kusema kuwa mshahara wa mbunge exactly ni shilingi kadhaa, imefichwa hivyo watu wamebaki kukisia kisia tu.

Jerry Slaa amesema mshahara wa mbunge haukatwi kodi, Kamati ya Bunge badala ya kuwaita TRA waje kuthibitisha kama wanatoza kodi mshahara hu au la, wao wanamleta mhasibu wa bunge hilohilo linalotuhumiwa kutolipa kodi mishahara, atathibitisha nini huyu?

Mkuu


Maamuzi yote yaliyofikiwa na kamati ya maadili ya bunge ni batili na mfu kwa sababu yanaupendeleo (Totally BIASED)