Erythrocyte
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 143,138
- 288,731
Kila Ubaya Utalipwa
Kila Ubaya UtalipwaScottish
Elements of Treason Offence Commission in Tanzania
To establish a treason charge in a Tanzanian court, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed a treasonous act against the United Republic and that this act was carried out by an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic. Specifically, the act must involve either the murder or attempted murder of the President, or the act of waging war against the United Republic, whether within the nation or abroad. Additionally, it must be demonstrated that the act was intentional, with the accused possessing the necessary mental state to commit treason.
- Allegiance to the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: The accused must be a person who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
- Overt Act: A key element is the manifestation of the intention through an overt act. This could be a physical action, a statement, or even the publication of writings that demonstrate the intention to commit treason.
- Intent to Harm the State or President: The prosecution must prove the accused had the specific intention to overthrow the government, depose the President by unlawful means, or cause him harm.
- Specific Actions Constituting Treason: Levying war against the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: This involves engaging in armed conflict or rebellion against the state. Murdering or attempting to murder the President: This includes any act aimed at causing the death of the President. Deposing the President by unlawful means refers to actions taken to remove the President from office through illegal or unconstitutional methods. Overthrowing the government by unlawful means: This includes efforts to seize power through illegal means. It's important to note that charges of treason are taken very seriously and have significant legal and political implications.
Elaboration:
The Tanzanian Penal Code specifies the acts that are classified as treason and the extent to which they must be substantiated.
Key elements that must be established:Allegiance:
The accused must be an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
Treasonable Act:
The act must fall into one of the following categories:
Murdering or attempting to murder the President.Levying war against the United Republic.Intent:It must be shown that the act was performed with the intent to commit treason, reflecting the accused's mental state and awareness of the repercussions of their actions, as per the Court of Appeal for East Africa.Overt Act:
The prosecution is tasked with demonstrating an overt act that clearly indicates the accused's intention to commit treason.
Evidence:
The evidence provided must be adequate to establish the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The term "overt act" is pivotal in the context of proving treason, as it denotes the observable action taken by the accused to advance their treasonous intent.
The responsibility of proof rests with the prosecution, which must convince the court beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused has committed the offence.
Summary
Components of the treason offence
Kilamu
- An individual who has an allegiance to the United Republic of Tanzania
- Engages in (waging) warfare or aligns with an adversary of the United Republic of Tanzania and
- Performs an overt act (publicly promoting an illegal act) and
- Harbours treasonous intent
Vipengele vya Utendaji wa kosa la Uhaini nchini Tanzania
1. Uaminifu au utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Mshitakiwa lazima awe mtu anayepaswa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
2. Kitendo Cha Dhahiri: Kipengele muhimu ni kuonyesha nia kupitia kitendo cha dhahiri. Hii inaweza kuwa hatua ya kimwili, taarifa, au hata kuchapisha maandiko yanayoonyesha nia ya kutenda uhaini.
3. Nia ya Kudhuru Jimbo au Rais: Mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kuwa mshitakiwa alikuwa na nia maalum ya kuangusha serikali, kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria, au kumdhuru.
4. Vitendo Maalum Vinavyounda uhaini:
Kuweka vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Hii inahusisha kushiriki katika mzozo wa silaha au uasi dhidi ya serikali.
Kumuua au kujaribu kumuua Rais: Hii inajumuisha kitendo chochote kilichokusudia kusababisha kifo cha Rais.
Kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inahusisha vitendo vilivyofanywa kuondoa Rais kutoka ofisini kwa njia haramu.
Kuangusha serikali kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inajumuisha juhudi za kuchukua madaraka kwa njia haramu.
Ni muhimu kutambua kwamba mashtaka ya usaliti yanachukuliwa kwa uzito mkubwa na yana athari kubwa za kisheria na kisiasa.
Ili kuanzisha shtaka la uhaini katika mahakama ya Tanzania, mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kwamba mshtakiwa alifanya kitendo cha uhaini dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano na kwamba kitendo hiki kilifanywa na mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano. Kwa hasara, kitendo lazima kiwe kinahusisha ama mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais, au kitendo cha kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, iwe ndani ya taifa au nje. Zaidi ya hayo, lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilikuwa na makusudi, huku mshtakiwa akiwa na hali ya akili inayohitajika kutenda uhaini.
Ufafanuzi:
Kanuni za Kisheria za Tanzania zinaeleza vitendo ambavyo vinachukuliwa kuwa uhaini na kiwango ambacho vinapaswa kuthibitishwa.
Vipengele muhimu vinavyopaswa kuanzishwa: Uaminifu au utii wa mamlaka:
Mshtakiwa lazima awe mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu au wajibu wa utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
Kitendo cha Uhaini:
Kitendo lazima kiangukie katika moja ya makundi yafuatayo:
• Mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais
.• Kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano.Makusudi:Lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilifanywa kwa makusudi ya kutenda uhaini, ikionyesha hali ya akili ya mshtakiwa na ufahamu wa matokeo ya vitendo vyao, kama inavyoelezwa na Mahakama ya Rufaa ya Afrika Mashariki.
Upande wa mashtaka yana jukumu la kuonyesha kitendo kilichofanyika ambacho kinadhihirisha wazi nia ya mshtakiwa kutenda uhaini.
Ushahidi uliotolewa lazima uwe wa kutosha kuanzisha hatia ya mshtakiwa bila shaka yoyote.
Hitimisho
Vipengele vya kosa la uhaini
Hakuna hata moja ambalo TAL amehusika kulitenda, hapa anateswa na wanasiasa wasio na uwezo wa kupambana kihoja.
- Mtu ambaye ana uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania
- Anajihusisha na (kuanzisha) vita au kuungana na adui wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania na
- Anatekeleza kitendo cha wazi (kukuza hadharani kitendo kisicho halali) na
- Ana nia ya uhaini
Kwenye kesi ya Mbowe ya ugaidi mashahidi walitajwa wengi kwa idadi lkn waliotoa ushahidi ni 5/7?. ....Rau juu....Hii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
Hii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
[/QUOT
Mfa Maji...
CLASS OF 2025.Hii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
Mtu mmoja kuipindua nchi yenye serikali mbili, nchi mbili, mabunge mawili na marais wawili ndani ya chama kimoja kinachotawala! Lissu is more than RAMBO.Scottish
Elements of Treason Offence Commission in Tanzania
To establish a treason charge in a Tanzanian court, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed a treasonous act against the United Republic and that this act was carried out by an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic. Specifically, the act must involve either the murder or attempted murder of the President, or the act of waging war against the United Republic, whether within the nation or abroad. Additionally, it must be demonstrated that the act was intentional, with the accused possessing the necessary mental state to commit treason.
- Allegiance to the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: The accused must be a person who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
- Overt Act: A key element is the manifestation of the intention through an overt act. This could be a physical action, a statement, or even the publication of writings that demonstrate the intention to commit treason.
- Intent to Harm the State or President: The prosecution must prove the accused had the specific intention to overthrow the government, depose the President by unlawful means, or cause him harm.
- Specific Actions Constituting Treason: Levying war against the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: This involves engaging in armed conflict or rebellion against the state. Murdering or attempting to murder the President: This includes any act aimed at causing the death of the President. Deposing the President by unlawful means refers to actions taken to remove the President from office through illegal or unconstitutional methods. Overthrowing the government by unlawful means: This includes efforts to seize power through illegal means. It's important to note that charges of treason are taken very seriously and have significant legal and political implications.
Elaboration:
The Tanzanian Penal Code specifies the acts that are classified as treason and the extent to which they must be substantiated.
Key elements that must be established:Allegiance:
The accused must be an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
Treasonable Act:
The act must fall into one of the following categories:
Murdering or attempting to murder the President.Levying war against the United Republic.Intent:It must be shown that the act was performed with the intent to commit treason, reflecting the accused's mental state and awareness of the repercussions of their actions, as per the Court of Appeal for East Africa.Overt Act:
The prosecution is tasked with demonstrating an overt act that clearly indicates the accused's intention to commit treason.
Evidence:
The evidence provided must be adequate to establish the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The term "overt act" is pivotal in the context of proving treason, as it denotes the observable action taken by the accused to advance their treasonous intent.
The responsibility of proof rests with the prosecution, which must convince the court beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused has committed the offence.
Summary
Components of the treason offence
Kilamu
- An individual who has an allegiance to the United Republic of Tanzania
- Engages in (waging) warfare or aligns with an adversary of the United Republic of Tanzania and
- Performs an overt act (publicly promoting an illegal act) and
- Harbours treasonous intent
Vipengele vya Utendaji wa kosa la Uhaini nchini Tanzania
1. Uaminifu au utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Mshitakiwa lazima awe mtu anayepaswa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
2. Kitendo Cha Dhahiri: Kipengele muhimu ni kuonyesha nia kupitia kitendo cha dhahiri. Hii inaweza kuwa hatua ya kimwili, taarifa, au hata kuchapisha maandiko yanayoonyesha nia ya kutenda uhaini.
3. Nia ya Kudhuru Jimbo au Rais: Mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kuwa mshitakiwa alikuwa na nia maalum ya kuangusha serikali, kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria, au kumdhuru.
4. Vitendo Maalum Vinavyounda uhaini:
Kuweka vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Hii inahusisha kushiriki katika mzozo wa silaha au uasi dhidi ya serikali.
Kumuua au kujaribu kumuua Rais: Hii inajumuisha kitendo chochote kilichokusudia kusababisha kifo cha Rais.
Kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inahusisha vitendo vilivyofanywa kuondoa Rais kutoka ofisini kwa njia haramu.
Kuangusha serikali kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inajumuisha juhudi za kuchukua madaraka kwa njia haramu.
Ni muhimu kutambua kwamba mashtaka ya usaliti yanachukuliwa kwa uzito mkubwa na yana athari kubwa za kisheria na kisiasa.
Ili kuanzisha shtaka la uhaini katika mahakama ya Tanzania, mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kwamba mshtakiwa alifanya kitendo cha uhaini dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano na kwamba kitendo hiki kilifanywa na mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano. Kwa hasara, kitendo lazima kiwe kinahusisha ama mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais, au kitendo cha kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, iwe ndani ya taifa au nje. Zaidi ya hayo, lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilikuwa na makusudi, huku mshtakiwa akiwa na hali ya akili inayohitajika kutenda uhaini.
Ufafanuzi:
Kanuni za Kisheria za Tanzania zinaeleza vitendo ambavyo vinachukuliwa kuwa uhaini na kiwango ambacho vinapaswa kuthibitishwa.
Vipengele muhimu vinavyopaswa kuanzishwa: Uaminifu au utii wa mamlaka:
Mshtakiwa lazima awe mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu au wajibu wa utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
Kitendo cha Uhaini:
Kitendo lazima kiangukie katika moja ya makundi yafuatayo:
• Mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais
.• Kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano.Makusudi:Lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilifanywa kwa makusudi ya kutenda uhaini, ikionyesha hali ya akili ya mshtakiwa na ufahamu wa matokeo ya vitendo vyao, kama inavyoelezwa na Mahakama ya Rufaa ya Afrika Mashariki.
Upande wa mashtaka yana jukumu la kuonyesha kitendo kilichofanyika ambacho kinadhihirisha wazi nia ya mshtakiwa kutenda uhaini.
Ushahidi uliotolewa lazima uwe wa kutosha kuanzisha hatia ya mshtakiwa bila shaka yoyote.
Hitimisho
Vipengele vya kosa la uhaini
Hakuna hata moja ambalo TAL amehusika kulitenda, hapa anateswa na wanasiasa wasio na uwezo wa kupambana kihoja.
- Mtu ambaye ana uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania
- Anajihusisha na (kuanzisha) vita au kuungana na adui wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania na
- Anatekeleza kitendo cha wazi (kukuza hadharani kitendo kisicho halali) na
- Ana nia ya uhaini
Mnajaribu kugeuza uongo kuwa ukweli na ukweli kuwa uongo. Kama ni mpango wa Mungu mnafanya kazi bure. Hao ni mashahidi wa uongo kwenye kesi ya uongo. Uamuzi wa kuipeleka kesi mahakamani bila media ni kujaribu kukwepa aibu.Hii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
Kitengo cha propaganda cha ccm kingetangaza kazi wangepata watu wanaomudu hiyo kazi.Hii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
Wenye akili hapo hamna kesi ni kupotezeana mida tu. TL atawanyoosha kwa kutumia utaratibu wao wenyewe ngoja afike mahakama kuuHii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
Hicho kitenga hamna mwenye akiliKitengo cha propaganda cha ccm kingetangaza kazi wangepata watu wanaomudu hiyo kazi.
Ninachoona kwa sasa ni machawa tu.
Imagine mtu kama
Lucas Mwashambwa
Tlaatlaah
ChoiceVariable
George wa tahliso
funaku
Rounded mouth
Ndio wasemaji..
Mashahidi wa Lissu wako wangapi?Mashahidi 30 ni wengi ila wote wanakuwa muflis,ila shahid watatu wa TAL ni hatar kama kaa la moto,sa100,majaaliwa,mpango
Wakili ajue kuna Mungu na siku ya hukumu siku ya kiama atasimama pekee yakeHii kesi nilihisi ni kama mzaha lakini kwa Hii idadi ya mashahidi iliyotajwa ni wazi kesi hii sio ndogo kama baadhi ya watu wanavyohisi.
N.B
Wakili wa Serikali amewasilisha idadi hii ya mashahidi na vielelezo.
paschal mayalla
DAHScottish
Elements of Treason Offence Commission in Tanzania
To establish a treason charge in a Tanzanian court, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed a treasonous act against the United Republic and that this act was carried out by an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic. Specifically, the act must involve either the murder or attempted murder of the President, or the act of waging war against the United Republic, whether within the nation or abroad. Additionally, it must be demonstrated that the act was intentional, with the accused possessing the necessary mental state to commit treason.
- Allegiance to the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: The accused must be a person who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
- Overt Act: A key element is the manifestation of the intention through an overt act. This could be a physical action, a statement, or even the publication of writings that demonstrate the intention to commit treason.
- Intent to Harm the State or President: The prosecution must prove the accused had the specific intention to overthrow the government, depose the President by unlawful means, or cause him harm.
- Specific Actions Constituting Treason: Levying war against the United Republic, Parliament or Judiciary: This involves engaging in armed conflict or rebellion against the state. Murdering or attempting to murder the President: This includes any act aimed at causing the death of the President. Deposing the President by unlawful means refers to actions taken to remove the President from office through illegal or unconstitutional methods. Overthrowing the government by unlawful means: This includes efforts to seize power through illegal means. It's important to note that charges of treason are taken very seriously and have significant legal and political implications.
Elaboration:
The Tanzanian Penal Code specifies the acts that are classified as treason and the extent to which they must be substantiated.
Key elements that must be established:Allegiance:
The accused must be an individual who owes allegiance to the United Republic.
Treasonable Act:
The act must fall into one of the following categories:
Murdering or attempting to murder the President.Levying war against the United Republic.Intent:It must be shown that the act was performed with the intent to commit treason, reflecting the accused's mental state and awareness of the repercussions of their actions, as per the Court of Appeal for East Africa.Overt Act:
The prosecution is tasked with demonstrating an overt act that clearly indicates the accused's intention to commit treason.
Evidence:
The evidence provided must be adequate to establish the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The term "overt act" is pivotal in the context of proving treason, as it denotes the observable action taken by the accused to advance their treasonous intent.
The responsibility of proof rests with the prosecution, which must convince the court beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused has committed the offence.
Summary
Components of the treason offence
Kilamu
- An individual who has an allegiance to the United Republic of Tanzania
- Engages in (waging) warfare or aligns with an adversary of the United Republic of Tanzania and
- Performs an overt act (publicly promoting an illegal act) and
- Harbours treasonous intent
Vipengele vya Utendaji wa kosa la Uhaini nchini Tanzania
1. Uaminifu au utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Mshitakiwa lazima awe mtu anayepaswa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
2. Kitendo Cha Dhahiri: Kipengele muhimu ni kuonyesha nia kupitia kitendo cha dhahiri. Hii inaweza kuwa hatua ya kimwili, taarifa, au hata kuchapisha maandiko yanayoonyesha nia ya kutenda uhaini.
3. Nia ya Kudhuru Jimbo au Rais: Mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kuwa mshitakiwa alikuwa na nia maalum ya kuangusha serikali, kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria, au kumdhuru.
4. Vitendo Maalum Vinavyounda uhaini:
Kuweka vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, Bunge au Mahakama: Hii inahusisha kushiriki katika mzozo wa silaha au uasi dhidi ya serikali.
Kumuua au kujaribu kumuua Rais: Hii inajumuisha kitendo chochote kilichokusudia kusababisha kifo cha Rais.
Kumuangusha Rais kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inahusisha vitendo vilivyofanywa kuondoa Rais kutoka ofisini kwa njia haramu.
Kuangusha serikali kwa njia zisizo za kisheria: Hii inajumuisha juhudi za kuchukua madaraka kwa njia haramu.
Ni muhimu kutambua kwamba mashtaka ya usaliti yanachukuliwa kwa uzito mkubwa na yana athari kubwa za kisheria na kisiasa.
Ili kuanzisha shtaka la uhaini katika mahakama ya Tanzania, mashtaka lazima yaonyeshe kwamba mshtakiwa alifanya kitendo cha uhaini dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano na kwamba kitendo hiki kilifanywa na mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano. Kwa hasara, kitendo lazima kiwe kinahusisha ama mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais, au kitendo cha kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano, iwe ndani ya taifa au nje. Zaidi ya hayo, lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilikuwa na makusudi, huku mshtakiwa akiwa na hali ya akili inayohitajika kutenda uhaini.
Ufafanuzi:
Kanuni za Kisheria za Tanzania zinaeleza vitendo ambavyo vinachukuliwa kuwa uhaini na kiwango ambacho vinapaswa kuthibitishwa.
Vipengele muhimu vinavyopaswa kuanzishwa: Uaminifu au utii wa mamlaka:
Mshtakiwa lazima awe mtu ambaye anadaiwa kuwa na uaminifu au wajibu wa utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano.
Kitendo cha Uhaini:
Kitendo lazima kiangukie katika moja ya makundi yafuatayo:
• Mauaji au jaribio la mauaji ya Rais
.• Kuanzisha vita dhidi ya Jamhuri ya Muungano.Makusudi:Lazima ionyeshwe kwamba kitendo kilifanywa kwa makusudi ya kutenda uhaini, ikionyesha hali ya akili ya mshtakiwa na ufahamu wa matokeo ya vitendo vyao, kama inavyoelezwa na Mahakama ya Rufaa ya Afrika Mashariki.
Upande wa mashtaka yana jukumu la kuonyesha kitendo kilichofanyika ambacho kinadhihirisha wazi nia ya mshtakiwa kutenda uhaini.
Ushahidi uliotolewa lazima uwe wa kutosha kuanzisha hatia ya mshtakiwa bila shaka yoyote.
Hitimisho
Vipengele vya kosa la uhaini
Hakuna hata moja ambalo TAL amehusika kulitenda, hapa anateswa na wanasiasa wasio na uwezo wa kupambana kihoja.
- Mtu ambaye ana uaminifu kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania
- Anajihusisha na (kuanzisha) vita au kuungana na adui wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania na
- Anatekeleza kitendo cha wazi (kukuza hadharani kitendo kisicho halali) na
- Ana nia ya uhaini
Ili kesi iendelee hadi uchaguzi upiteKusimamia uongo, kunahutaji Uongo mwingi sana.
Wala hakuna Cha kesi kubwa, ni Mashahidi wengi ili kupoteza Muda.
Kwa hiyo kutangaza hadharani uasi sio kosa?Wadanganye wapumbavu wenzio huko lumumba tuliokuwa mahamakani tunajua upuuzi wa kesi waliyofungua hao waliofungua ni aibu ni aibu kubwa sn maelezo ya hao mashahidi 30 wote kwa mujibu wa sheria lissu hana kosa lolote si la uhaini bali hata la kumnyooshea mtu kidole hana kwa mujibu wa sheria za uchaguzi hakuna kosa la uhaini alilofanya kwa mujibu wa katiba hana kosa sa ukubwa wa hii kesi uko wp na kwa taarifa yenu huyu lissu amezd kuwa powerful kwa ujinga wa mijitu ya ccm akitoka huko hakamatiki tena
Kwa jinsi alivyosema "wanasema tunataka kufanya uasi, ndiyo tutafanya uasi tutazuia uchaguzi mkuu"
Inabidi afafanue alimaanisha nini
Kwa hiyo kutangaza hadharani uasi sio kosa?
KWA MUJIBU KWA MUJIBU KWA MUJIBU. NYAMBAFFF WEKA A SPECIFIC CLAUSE AU KIFUNGU KUHALALISHA HOJA YAKOWadanganye wapumbavu wenzio huko lumumba tuliokuwa mahamakani tunajua upuuzi wa kesi waliyofungua hao waliofungua ni aibu ni aibu kubwa sn maelezo ya hao mashahidi 30 wote kwa mujibu wa sheria lissu hana kosa lolote si la uhaini bali hata la kumnyooshea mtu kidole hana kwa mujibu wa sheria za uchaguzi hakuna kosa la uhaini alilofanya kwa mujibu wa katiba hana kosa sa ukubwa wa hii kesi uko wp na kwa taarifa yenu huyu lissu amezd kuwa powerful kwa ujinga wa mijitu ya ccm akitoka huko hakamatiki tena