Rutashubanyuma
JF-Expert Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 219,468
- 911,184
IPTL & PAP legal rumblings are designed to intimidate our parliament and abuse the judiciary with clear intents of confining the doctrine of separation of powers between the Bench and the Augusta House into a state of paralysis, ridicule and contempt.
The IPTL cum PAP are top government protagonists' owned who have hired mercenaries of conmanship to carry out their dirty work on their behalf. Since the same henchmen in the government control the reins of judiciary it is a small wonder that all legal disputes referred to our courts - the government has been taken to the cleaners! Even our legal representation is structured in a such a way that pettifoggers are promoted to mislead and confuse international arbitrators to ensure these companies which have always been local despite alternative claims to that, triumph at our expense.
We are told IPTL was purchased by PAP but the paradox is IPTL continue to have a locus standi on ownership issues which it had relinquished! The 320 billion shillings question is why can a sold company still retain legal and pecuniary interests on a company it had legally disposed of?
Another mind boggling query is IPTL owes HONGKONG STANDARD CHARTERED BANK where the loans we had guarranteed them goes unpaid, and PAP does not seem keen to own that legal dispute!
Normally a company buys both assets and liabilities but PAP is only interested in IPTL juicy parts and does everything to dissuade itself with that loan hoping we shall pay it on strength of guaranteeing the loan! The overriding snag is we had leverage in PAP registration and TANESCO debts to ensure PAP meets its IPTL ownership dues. But because top public servants are the true owners of the IPTL and its "mutant ninjas", they have been permitted to go scotchfree - relieved to account for unpaid loans and resolution of IPTL transfer which did not follow strict provisions of company registration act.
Under this cloud of taking the nation for a ride you would expect IPTL cum PAP would have crossed their grubby fingers, and be contented with what they had looted us, so far. Sadly, this is not so as the curse of avarice overshadows them.
Any attempt to connive and entice our courts to upend parliamentary diktats is misinformed, premature and ill advised. Our courts may have residual authority to curtail parliamentary overzealousness but our judiciary has no power to curb supervisory onus of the House over the executive branch. Those check and balance constitutional provisions are purposefully there to ensure that the performance of the government is at all time smooth and accountable to her citizenry. To claim otherwise we will be setting a bad precedence of extra judicial mischief and lawlessness!
Albeit, unwittingly, we will set the Bench, the parliament and the executive on collision course. The House may also decide to ignore court decisions in a manner which will debase our judicial system to a core. Who really will be a beneficiary when this country abseil into a failed state? For sure, neither our overfed politicians nor the incarnation of IPTL: PAP no all of us who are the true victims of public resources' looting.
The IPTL cum PAP are top government protagonists' owned who have hired mercenaries of conmanship to carry out their dirty work on their behalf. Since the same henchmen in the government control the reins of judiciary it is a small wonder that all legal disputes referred to our courts - the government has been taken to the cleaners! Even our legal representation is structured in a such a way that pettifoggers are promoted to mislead and confuse international arbitrators to ensure these companies which have always been local despite alternative claims to that, triumph at our expense.
We are told IPTL was purchased by PAP but the paradox is IPTL continue to have a locus standi on ownership issues which it had relinquished! The 320 billion shillings question is why can a sold company still retain legal and pecuniary interests on a company it had legally disposed of?
Another mind boggling query is IPTL owes HONGKONG STANDARD CHARTERED BANK where the loans we had guarranteed them goes unpaid, and PAP does not seem keen to own that legal dispute!
Normally a company buys both assets and liabilities but PAP is only interested in IPTL juicy parts and does everything to dissuade itself with that loan hoping we shall pay it on strength of guaranteeing the loan! The overriding snag is we had leverage in PAP registration and TANESCO debts to ensure PAP meets its IPTL ownership dues. But because top public servants are the true owners of the IPTL and its "mutant ninjas", they have been permitted to go scotchfree - relieved to account for unpaid loans and resolution of IPTL transfer which did not follow strict provisions of company registration act.
Under this cloud of taking the nation for a ride you would expect IPTL cum PAP would have crossed their grubby fingers, and be contented with what they had looted us, so far. Sadly, this is not so as the curse of avarice overshadows them.
Any attempt to connive and entice our courts to upend parliamentary diktats is misinformed, premature and ill advised. Our courts may have residual authority to curtail parliamentary overzealousness but our judiciary has no power to curb supervisory onus of the House over the executive branch. Those check and balance constitutional provisions are purposefully there to ensure that the performance of the government is at all time smooth and accountable to her citizenry. To claim otherwise we will be setting a bad precedence of extra judicial mischief and lawlessness!
Albeit, unwittingly, we will set the Bench, the parliament and the executive on collision course. The House may also decide to ignore court decisions in a manner which will debase our judicial system to a core. Who really will be a beneficiary when this country abseil into a failed state? For sure, neither our overfed politicians nor the incarnation of IPTL: PAP no all of us who are the true victims of public resources' looting.