You vainly dismissed the dudes arguments.
May be you should put your arguments in a very simple language. Sometimes it is easier that way.I didn't, its him who was avoiding the basic argument that led to my remarks. Im not sure whether he was doing it intentionally but after repeatedly directing him back to what he was supposed to refer to before starting another argument and him still insisting on bringing forward his blank, unsubstantiated opinions, I concluded that he simply didn't understand what we were arguing about. Its simple as that.
May be you should put your arguments in a very simple language. Sometimes it is easier that way.
Tell me do you believe in God?Again, this doesnt refute first cause argument. This is a bait and switch argument..
You are one of themWhat is mindless is to float the idea that atheists are mindless.
I am the truth seeker and I believe in humanity and moral values, If God exists in those categories then I believe him..
The way of life can be free and beautiful. But we have lost the way, our knowledge has made us cynical our cleverness hard and unkind. We think too much and feel to little. The truth of life has been revealed, the truth will turn this world right side up. The truth is the only way, let us fight for the real truth. Let us fight for a world of reason. Let us do away with borders, hate and intolerance. Let us fight for science and reason. Let us unite, the truth of life is the only way. Nothing could be more important or worthwhile. If the truth means something to you check it for yourself, if survival means something to you. Check it for yourself.
What is mindless is to float the idea that atheists are mindless.
You are mindless.
:alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien:You are homo.
:alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien::alien:
Wewe ukisha amka tu kitu cha kwanza kwenye bichwa yako ni homo. Astaghafurillah.
In philosophical discourse like this there is what we call ARGUMENT FROM IGNORANCE that if you don't have evidence that something doesn't exist,that in itself is not a good enough reason to justify that thing doesn't exist...which means ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE!The Argument from Ignorance stems from the observation that there are natural phenomena, such as gravity, dark matter, etc, which science as yet cannot fully explain. It concludes that this ignorance is, in itself, evidence for the existence of Godt is sometimes known as the "God of the Gaps" Argument because it views God as existing in the "gaps" or aspects of reality that are currently unexplained by scientific knowledge.
What evidence is there that QM pre-existed the physical universe to cause the physical universe into existence? Which interpretation?
Otherwise, where did QM exist in a physical Universe that did not exist?
Explain how QM escapes causal necessity?
Explain how QM models the real world? Which interpretation?
Explain why anyone should believe classical space and time is not a real feature of the universe?
You are ghey.
Mental paranoia.
Unaona aibu ya kusema kwanini, wewe tangaza biashara yako hapa. Utawapata wengi wanao shughurikia inshehee.Are you Geysus?
Unaona aibu ya kusema kwanini, wewe tangaza biashara yako hapa. Utawapata wengi wanao shughurikia inshehee.
Lucifer, why are you obsessed with humans?You is gheeeeey
You are homo.