Is Tanzania Ready for Take Off?

Is Tanzania Ready for Take Off?

Mzalendo JR

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Posts
1,193
Reaction score
515
Wow.....!
This is the only thing my mind is craving for the majority think-tankers to know, its an article worth sharing truly.

Dar es Salaam — After five decades of formulating strategies as well as policies, and following repeated political statements on the importance of industries in Tanzania's economic growth, has the time arrived for a take-off? Is there now conducive environment that addresses the weaknesses which hindered industrialisation over the last 50 years?

Have national leaders, policy makers, the business community and academicians come up with a new vision that will help the country to join, albeit gradually, the league of major exporters of industrial goods?

Has Tanzania now garnered enough political will and determination to break from past repeated failures and become an industrial producer? Does Tanzania really have the potential, the competitive and the strategic advantages for an "industrial revolution"?
Is there any hope the new-found enthusiasm on industrialisation will soon translate into a new dynamism and a push for an industrial take off?

These are some of the pertinent questions that observers of Tanzania's current affairs ask themselves, and which need to be answered as the renewed talk on industrialisation garner momentum.This is because unless efforts are made to learn from past mistakes and objectively assess Tanzania's chances at industrialisation, the country might end up repeating the same goofs it made in the past.

Tomes and tomes of research reports have been written by academicians in the last 50 years or so on why Tanzania's industrialisation failed to take off. The main theme coming out of the studies is that the stumbling blocks are not unknown, for most of them are very obvious.

Lack of the money needed to build the capacity and create conducive environment for the emergence of a local entrepreneurial base and foreign investment inflows is one of the major factors that are being mentioned.

Other factors that have traditionally hindered an industrial take off include inadequate infrastructure, poor technology, and shortage of skilled labour. Others are an underdeveloped internal market and political ideologies that made the state the driving force of industrialisation, stifling, in the process, the entrepreneurial spirit of Tanzanians, which is vital in any industrial project.

Inadequate infrastructure, for example, has been a constant factor in the litany of woes that bedevil industrial development in Tanzania. From poor roads, railways to erratic water and electricity supplies as well as underdeveloped and expensive telecommunications services.

For a long time, especially in the first four decades of independence, the road and rail network didn't interconnect the country well enough to facilitate movement of goods and services within the same regions and countrywide.

In the first three of independence, most of the Tanzanian hinterland was virtually impassable. Little or no efforts were made to improve the road and railways network pattern that was left by colonialists and which was directed to the major seaports to facilitate export of raw materials and import of finished goods. Poor infrastructure makes establishing industrial centres upcountry very expensive.

"No industry can run smoothly in an environment where the whole range of basic infrastructure is pathetic. Fortunately, there are now visible efforts by the government to address infrastructural constraints, but these need to be intensified," says Dennis Rweyemamu, head of Research and Policy at the Institute of African Leadership for Sustainable Development famously known as Uongozi Institute.

However, more needs to be done to overhaul the infrastructure. The railway system, which was in a good, working shape in the past, has crumbled and needs replacement. The road network is still inadequate. Despite the fact that the 12,786km national road network (trunk roads) has been largely improved since 2000 the regional roads, which provide an important link in the logistics chain between rural centres of production and markets are in a poor shape.

This is a major bottleneck to realising economic potential of the hinterlands. Of the 21,105km of regional road network, only about four per cent is in bitumen standard. Of the paved roads, only 45 per cent of them are in a good standard, according to an African Development Bank report.

"The focus on trunk roads is the correct policy given their strategic nature for both regional development and the international linkages to neighbouring countries. Future planning needs to give more attention to the regional road network to improve connectivity in the logistics chain between areas of production or development potential and markets," reads in part the Transport Review report prepared by the AfDB.

The litany of challenges to the industrialisation path is long. How the government addresses them will make the whole difference in Tanzania's industrial take-off.

Source: allafrica
 
The deterrent to a rapid Asian like path to industrialization in not just Tanzania but in the whole EAC as an entity to me is a result of repeated lack of prioritizing by the government's. Politicians lack the will and motivation to place the country above their personal needs. And the people being oblivious of the obligations of these politicians due to lack of education fail to put them to task, hence the cyclic never ending corruption and underdevelopment

The most important resource for any country is its human resource. A good illustration is the fact that very resource poor Japan and Singapore are two of the world's most developed economies. This is because they tapped into their people, educated them, laid down policies and institutions to see to it that their talents and hard work are harnessed. If we as East Africans will only build roads and rail to link mines with ports, we will not go anywhere. The resource curse will catch up with us. Roads should first facilitate movement of people and what they produce from point A to B before we can even think of extending them to mines. The education system should be revamped so as not to encourage people to go out there and seek a job in the office but to create an opportunity themselves. I think Tanzania is far from that.

For industrialization to occur, far more roads, rail, schools, electricity, policies and many other things are needed. Just as an illustration, Kenya, which is less than half the size of Tanzania has almost twice the length of Tanzania' paved road network, yet she is still a developing country. Now it gets even worse when you note that France, an industrialized country that is the same size as Kenya or less than half of Tanzania has almost 100 times the length of paved roads as Tanzania. There is a whole lot of work to be done.
 
The fifth phase government acting under CCM manifesto in line with melennium development goals is determined to usher the country through to being a mid growing economy by reviving industries and promoting the establishment of industries. Well Tanzania for the past 50 years has seen tremendous political social and economic development which set pace now for the achievement of industrial growth. Though much is to be done still in terms of infrastructure, capital, labor and policies. Since development is gradual let's give the government time and support to head us there.
 
The deterrent to a rapid Asian like path to industrialization in not just Tanzania but in the whole EAC as an entity to me is a result of repeated lack of prioritizing by the government's. Politicians lack the will and motivation to place the country above their personal needs. And the people being oblivious of the obligations of these politicians due to lack of education fail to put them to task, hence the cyclic never ending corruption and underdevelopment

The most important resource for any country is its human resource. A good illustration is the fact that very resource poor Japan and Singapore are two of the world's most developed economies. This is because they tapped into their people, educated them, laid down policies and institutions to see to it that their talents and hard work are harnessed. If we as East Africans will only build roads and rail to link mines with ports, we will not go anywhere. The resource curse will catch up with us. Roads should first facilitate movement of people and what they produce from point A to B before we can even think of extending them to mines. The education system should be revamped so as not to encourage people to go out there and seek a job in the office but to create an opportunity themselves. I think Tanzania is far from that.

For industrialization to occur, far more roads, rail, schools, electricity, policies and many other things are needed. Just as an illustration, Kenya, which is less than half the size of Tanzania has almost twice the length of Tanzania' paved road network, yet she is still a developing country. Now it gets even worse when you note that France, an industrialized country that is the same size as Kenya or less than half of Tanzania has almost 100 times the length of paved roads as Tanzania. There is a whole lot of work to be done.
I have repeatedly said many a time in JF, the most important factor in a country's development is the quality of the humans citizens at it's disposal. That is why resource rich Gabon imports frozen chicken from Europe, because its govt grew fat and rich on crude oil, and forgot to develop its citizens abilities to initiate agro industries,petrodollars notwithstanding. In fact, their wealth is paper wealth as they do not even benefi their citizenry, all of it being safely locked up in Paris. Contrast that with the UAE which has made considerable efforts to uplift her citizens before the oil runs out... let us not discuss Nigeria.

Internal markets are far more important than external ones for a country's material well being IMO. Sadly as you say, physical infrastructure is built to serve an export market in many African nations, and markets that are not guaranteed anyway! The best example i have ever observed of a country having poorly developed internal markets is some time ago when i observed mozambicans resident in South Africa returning home with hundreds of dozens of eggs per person (incl kids), the reason being they are at least 10 times cheaper than back home!! Imagine that!!!

My take: throw the WB/IMF form book out of the window, and do the dirty but necessary work of attaining self sufficiency in the basic needs, and develop our towns, cities and countrysides to suit our needs first. Then export the surplus.
 
Livale, which Kenya with 100 times paved roads networks r u talking about! I know one that lost a pipeline deal cause no roads to support that multi blns dollar project...
 
Livale, which Kenya with 100 times paved roads networks r u talking about! I know one that lost a pipeline deal cause no roads to support that multi blns dollar project...
Hehe, you didn't understand the post. Isome tena utaona hakuna niliposema such an insane comment as Kenya having 100 times paved roads as Tz! Si Ingekuwa developed sahii !

I stated Kenya has double the paved road as Tz, while FRANCE, which is the same size as Kenya, ina 100 times the road network. Kisha nikongeza both France and Kenya have around half the area of Tanzania. Lengo lilikua kuonyesha jinsi developed countries zipo mbele na kwa vile France ni same size as Kenya, which is a close neighbor to Tz, nikaitumia as an example.

Sikutaka kuibua ubishi kati ya Kenya na Tanzania kwani mara nyingi ni matusi tu hutolewa hapo, nothing constructive to either country
 
The industrial revolution, in Tanzania has to focus on lifting people out of poverty not just to follow ,world bank and IMF orders..agriculture employs majority of the people,yet many industries focus on construction sector..I think the aim is to get people out of poverty.. one REPOA report on poverty reported that if agriculture grows more than five percent in five straight years, many people will be lifted out of poverty.. Industrial revolution vision must base on agriculture first and then service sector..
 
Back
Top Bottom