Mshirika ya habari kama BBC na CNN hawaonyeshi picha hizi na huko ndiko tunapoiga mambo yetu mengi-
Ni kweli kabisa lakini katika hao uliowataja matukio yao ni katika vita na naamini ile ilikuwa psychological warfare ambapo kama kuna waliokuwa wanshikaman na hao jamaa ilibidi wavunjike moyo.Kwa hili la Sharobaro,wasanii wale wa taarabu na wengine wengi sidhani kama kuna sababu ya msingi ya kufanya hivyo zaidi ya kumdhalilisha maiti.Mkuu hayo mashirikia unayoyataja c ndio yalioonyesha maiti za watoto wa Sadaam Uday na mwenzie wakati zikiwa mortuary..! Na hivi karibuni maiti ya Gadaf..
Mkuu hayo mashirikia unayoyataja c ndio yalioonyesha maiti za watoto wa Sadaam Uday na mwenzie wakati zikiwa mortuary..! Na hivi karibuni maiti ya Gadaf..
Asante sana mkuu,Ndoo maan naipenda JF.Ngoja tumtafute Tundu Lissu apeleke mswaada wa marekebisho ya sheria.Sheria zetu zinaishia hapa tu kuhusu makosa ya kuanika mwili wa mfu: \ Kanuni za Adhabu (Penal Code Cap. 16 R.E 2002) Kifungu cha 127. A person who, with the intention of wounding the feelings of any person or of insulting the religion of any person, or with the knowledge that the feelings of any person are likely to be wounded, or that the religion of any person is likely to be insulted thereby, commits any trespass in any place of worship or in any place of sepulture or in any place set apart for the performance of funeral rites or as a depository for the remains of the dead, or offers any indignity to any human corpse, or causes disturbance to any persons assembled for the purpose of funeral ceremonies, commits an offence. Kifungu cha 128. Any person who unlawfully hinders the burial of the dead body of any person or who, without lawful authority in that behalf or otherwise than in accordance with rules made by the Minister responsible for health (which rules the Minister is hereby authorised to make) disinters, dissects or causes damage to the dead body of any person or who, being under a duty to cause the dead body of any person to be buried, wilfully and without lawful authority in that behalf neglects to perform that duty, commits an offence."
mhh swala hili kiukweli si jambo zuri, kibinaadamu si vema kumdhalilisha maiti,hasa kwa kumtoa picha zake kwenye vyombo vya habari.
nafikiri sheria hii itazamwe tena na soon utaona magazeti ya udaku ndio itakuwa habari kuu kwa kuzusha mambo mengi ya siyo na msingi hasa kwenye kifo cha Sharo
[h=2]Newspaper rapped for second time over dead body pics[/h]by Sarah Bould, last updated on May 24, 2012
4 Comments
A Scottish newspaper has been rapped by the Press Complaints Commission for publishing a picture of a dead body – despite being censured for the same offence last year.
The Daily Record published the picture of the body of a dead man who had died in a road traffic accident the previous day.
In an article headlined ‘Two die in lorry, car and minibus pile-up' on 16 December the picture showed the man in the vehicle that he had died in.
His wife, Laura McQueen, complained that the photograph was graphic as it clearly showed her husband's injured face and had caused severe shock and upset to her family.
The newspaper apologised immediately and unreservedly to the family, explaining that it had not realised that the image had included the deceased man.
It issued new rules to its picture desk and production staff regarding the use of photographs with graphic content to ensure the error would not happen again. It also published a page two apology and offered to meet the complainant so that the editor could apologise in person.
The Commission found a clear breach of Clause 5, intrusion into grief or shock, of the Editors' Code of Practice.
It ruled that the publication of such an explicit image so soon after the death did not meet the Code's requirement on handling publication sensitively.
In October 2011 HTFP reported that a complaint against the newspaper was upheld when they published a photo of a dead body found on a footpath wrapped in sheeting. The outline of the dead man's arms and body could clearly be seen in the photo.
Although the press watchdog acknowledged that the publication of the photograph in the latest case was inadvertent, and that the newspaper's response had been "appropriate and responsible", it ruled that the breach "was not capable of remedy". It upheld the complaint as a result.
Charlotte Dewar head of complaints and pre-publication services said: "Clause 5 of the Editors' Code is designed to protect people when they are at their most vulnerable.
"This case illustrated how a failure to ensure sensitive handling in the report of a recent death – however inadvertent – can cause serious pain to those involved. As the Commission recognised in its ruling, once this has happened it can be very difficult or even impossible to remedy the harm done."
http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2012/news/newspaper-rapped-for-second-time-over-dead-body-pics/