Mahakama Kenya yazuia matumizi ya vifungu kadhaa vya Sheria ya Mitandao iliyopitishwa na Rais Kenyatta majuzi

Mahakama Kenya yazuia matumizi ya vifungu kadhaa vya Sheria ya Mitandao iliyopitishwa na Rais Kenyatta majuzi

Kafrican

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Posts
7,251
Reaction score
7,037
MAY 30, 2018

Kenyan court blocks new online rules after free speech petition


NAIROBI (Reuters) - A new cybercrime law came into force in Kenya on Wednesday, but without a ban on “false” information, after bloggers and journalists won a court order blocking rules they said could curtail free expression.

The Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act, signed by President Uhuru Kenyatta two weeks ago, is aimed at addressing online abuse that was not covered by laws that predated the proliferation of social media.

But the Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE) and the Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ) successfully petitioned a court to block parts of it.

On Tuesday, high court judge Chacha Mwita listed 26 sections of the law as regulations that would affect fundamental rights and freedoms and granted “conservatory orders” preventing anyone being charged under those clauses, pending a definitive ruling on July 18.

BAKE director James Wamathai said: “These sections purport to regulate false news but unfortunately that is against the constitution ... there are existing laws to remedy cases when someone is lying, we don’t need this.”

Other parts of the law penalize cyber-espionage and child pornography.

Judge Chacha Mwita has declared that the following sections are suspended until the case is heard:

Section 5 – Composition of the National Computer and Cybercrimes Coordination Committee
Section 16- Unauthorised interference
Section 17- Unauthorized interception
Section 22 – False publications
Section 23 – Publication of false information
Section 24- Child pornography
Section 27 – Cyber harassment
Section 28 – Cybersquatting
Section 29 – Identity theft and impersonation
Section 31 – Interception of electronic messages or money transfers
Section 32 – Willful misdirection of electronic messages
Section 33 – Cyber terrorism
Section 34 – Inducement to deliver electronic message
Section 35- Intentionally withholding message delivered erroneously
Section 36 – Unlawful destruction of electronic messages
Section 37- Wrongful distribution of obscene or intimate images.
Section 38- Fraudlent use of electronic data
Section 39- Issuance of false e-instructions
Section 40- Reportng of cyber threat
Section 41- Employee responsibility to relinquish access condes
Section 48 – Search and seizure of stored computer data
Section 49 – Record of and access to seized data
Section 50 – Production order
Section 51- Expedited preservation and partial disclosure of traffic data
Section 52 – Real-time collection of traffic data
Section 53- Interception of content data

Other East African countries have passed laws that activists complain curtail free expression.

Tanzania’s government won a court case on Tuesday against opponents of new regulations that require bloggers and activists to pay a license fee of up to $900 and disclose their financial backers.

In April, Uganda announced plans to tax social media users. Kenyan court blocks new online rules after free speech petition
 
Yani rais ameaibishwa kabisa, sasa naelewa kwanini rais anamchukia Maraga na mahakama... wiki mbili baada ya kutia saini sheria ya mtandao, mahakama imesimamisha vipengee 26 vya sheria hio kwa kukiuka katiba.... hii inamanisha bunge na ofisi ya rais ilipoteza mda wao na kula marupurupu ya bure wakijaribu kupitisha sheria hii, yani walifanya zero work... sasa itawalazimu kurudi bungeni na kuitunga tena hii sheria au waiache hivyo vile mahakama imefutilia mbali
 
High Court Judge Chacha Mwita on Tuesday suspended the coming into force of 26 sections of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act, 2018.

In a petition successfully filed by the Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE), the Judge granted the request by BAKE, Article 19 and the Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ) to give conservatory orders as the Act comes into effect tomorrow, 30th May 2018 and would have dire consequences on freedom of expression, freedom of the media and freedom of information.

The move came as Capital FM Kisii reporter Rose Onchari was ordered to record a statement at the Ogembo CID offices for reporting the incident in which while Machakos Governor Dr Alfred Mutua and Kisii Deputy Governor Joash Maangi were taking a selfie, the bridge they were standing on collapsed, albeit they were not injured. This incident unfortunately and gravely brings to light the reality that some powerful individuals cannot wait to use criminal defamation to curtail freedoms.

“I am satisfied that the issues raised affect the Constitution and fundamental rights and freedoms. I therefore grant the conservatory orders sought”, the Judge ruled. The case will resume on 18 th July 2018.
The suspended sections of the Act are: 5, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 & 53.

James Wamathai, the Director of Partnerships at BAKE, noted that the decision is timely, appropriate and important in protecting freedoms.

“In the past several years, there have been attempts by the government to clamp down on the freedom of expression online. This Act is a testament of these efforts, especially after other sections were declared unconstitutional by the courts.

He adds that the Act will seek to reintroduce the purged sections of the law while imposing even more restrictions on the freedom of expression. It is evident that Act will deny online users their right to participate in economic opportunities.

In its petition, BAKE cited that the law infringes on fundamental freedoms and limits various rights as guaranteed by the constitution. It is the Association’s contention that 26 sections of the law threaten the freedom of opinion, freedom of expression, freedom of the media, freedom and security of the person, right to privacy, right to property and the right to a fair hearing.

The Association went ahead to note that the membership of the National Computer and Cybercrimes Co-ordination Committee established under Section 4 of the Act does not conform to the two-thirds gender rule as all the members will be all male.

In a statement, Lead Council for Article 19 affirms that “Laws criminalising false news are very problematic because they are so broad and overly vague in their wording, meaning that it is subject to abuse by the authorities. Our courts have severally found that criminal laws which do not state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable are void for vagueness.”

Eric Oduor, the Secretary General of the Kenya Union of Journalists, asserted that sections of this law are retrogressive and reintroduce criminal libel in our laws. This decision is welcome as criminal libel was expunged from our laws by courts by the courts. The law will also interfere with self-regulation, which is prerequisite of press freedom.”

The Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act, 2018 was signed into law by the President on 16 th May 2018. It comes into force on Wednesday, May 30.

In the State of the Internet 2016 report done by BAKE annually, the association found that sixty bloggers had been arrested for exercising their freedom of expression online. During the same year, journalists and bloggers were silenced, intimidated, harassed and killed for their persistent exercise of their freedom of expression, freedom of the media and right of access to information. Social Media platforms had become effective platforms for online activism, online democracy and the fight for social justice as noted in the 2017 State of the Internet report.

BAKE was represented in the petition by lawyer Mercy Mutemi. Article 19 Eastern Africa and Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ) are enjoined in the case.
 
Kitu inatusaidia ni katiba. I like president Uhuru but several of his govt's bills have been unconstitutional. Remember the security amendment bill yenye ilifanya wabunge walimane mangumi, parts of it were declared unconstitutional. I thank God for our progressive constitution where even the president cannot take us back. Huko tulishatoka na haturudi ng'o.
 
Kitu inatusaidia ni katiba. I like president Uhuru but several of his govt's bills have been unconstitutional. Remember the security amendment bill yenye ilifanya wabunge walimane mangumi, parts of it were declared unconstitutional. I thank God for our progressive constitution where even the president cannot take us back. Huko tulishatoka na haturudi ng'o.
Tujifunze nasi kutoka kenya
 
That's a temporary block, hizo ni sheria na zimesainiwa na Raisi.. Hapo wataenda kushindana mahakamani lakini hawatashinda kamwe
 
That's a temporary block, hizo ni sheria na zimesainiwa na Raisi.. Hapo wataenda kushindana mahakamani lakini hawatashinda kamwe
hahahaha some portions have been suspended completely haswaa zile zinazokiuka katiba na zina nia ya kukandamiza...chances are that it will be suspended as a whole and returned to parliament for further consultation
 
That's a temporary block, hizo ni sheria na zimesainiwa na Raisi.. Hapo wataenda kushindana mahakamani lakini hawatashinda kamwe
In Kenya the constitution is superior to any law passed by parliament. Article 2 inasema any law that contradicts the constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency. Kwa kiswahili, hiyo inamaanisha kwamba sheria yoyote itakayopinga katiba iliyopitishwa na wananchi, hiyo sheria itatupiliwa mbali. Ndiyo hii evidence hapa. Soma sub-section 4.

Constitution of Kenya
Chapter One - Sovereignty of the People and Supremacy of this Constitution
ARTICLE 2. SUPREMACY OF THIS CONSTITUTION
Parent Category: The Constitution of Kenya


1) This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic and binds all persons and all State organs at both levels of government.

(2) No person may claim or exercise State authority except as authorised under this Constitution.

(3) The validity or legality of this Constitution is not subject to challenge by or before any court or other State organ.

(4) Any law, including customary law, that is inconsistent with this Constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency, and any act or omission in contravention of this Constitution is invalid.

(5) The general rules of international law shall form part of the law of Kenya.

(6) Any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution.

 
In Kenya the constitution is superior to any law passed by parliament. Article 2 inasema any law that contradicts the constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency. Kwa kiswahili, hiyo inamaanisha kwamba sheria yoyote itakayopinga katiba iliyopitishwa na wananchi, hiyo sheria itatupiliwa mbali. Ndiyo hii evidence hapa. Soma sub-section 4.

Constitution of Kenya
Chapter One - Sovereignty of the People and Supremacy of this Constitution
ARTICLE 2. SUPREMACY OF THIS CONSTITUTION
Parent Category: The Constitution of Kenya


1) This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic and binds all persons and all State organs at both levels of government.

(2) No person may claim or exercise State authority except as authorised under this Constitution.

(3) The validity or legality of this Constitution is not subject to challenge by or before any court or other State organ.

(4) Any law, including customary law, that is inconsistent with this Constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency, and any act or omission in contravention of this Constitution is invalid.

(5) The general rules of international law shall form part of the law of Kenya.

(6) Any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution.

Kwani Hatujaona kesi nyingi zilizozuiwa na Court lakini Serikali ikakaidi na kufanya ubabe?? Ngoja uone mwisho wake..
 
Kwani Hatujaona kesi nyingi zilizozuiwa na Court lakini Serikali ikakaidi na kufanya ubabe?? Ngoja uone mwisho wake..
Lakini Kenya tuko mbele kushinda Tanzania, kubali tu. Atleast sisi tunaeza pambana na serikali yetu hadi serikali yenyewe iinuwe mikono na kukubali kushindwa kwenye maswala ya sheria. Nyinyi hamuwezi hata jitetea.
 
Lakini Kenya tuko mbele kushinda Tanzania, kubali tu. Atleast sisi tunaeza pambana na serikali yetu hadi serikali yenyewe iinuwe mikono na kukubali kushindwa kwenye maswala ya sheria. Nyinyi hamuwezi hata jitetea.
hehehe mwambie hii ni kenya....hii sio tz ambapo rais ndio mungu wa pili...kenya has functioning institutions....the constitution is more powerful
 
Yani rais ameaibishwa kabisa, sasa naelewa kwanini rais anamchukia Maraga na mahakama... wiki mbili baada ya kutia saini sheria ya mtandao, mahakama imesimamisha vipengee 26 vya sheria hio kwa kukiuka katiba.... hii inamanisha bunge na ofisi ya rais ilipoteza mda wao na kula marupurupu ya bure wakijaribu kupitisha sheria hii, yani walifanya zero work... sasa itawalazimu kurudi bungeni na kuitunga tena hii sheria au waiache hivyo vile mahakama imefutilia mbali
Pending definitive ruling on Juy 7. Uamuzi huyo siyo wa mwisho.
 
hehehe mwambie hii ni kenya....hii sio tz ambapo rais ndio mungu wa pili...kenya has functioning institutions....the constitution is more powerful
Kabisa wachana na yeye. Tanzania hata Magufuli anaeza decide kusentence mtu to death kama judge na huyo mtu atanyongwa. Huko ni the rule of the jungle.
 
Back
Top Bottom