New administration under Samia Suluhu gives hope after 5 years of hopelessness

Huko nyuma wakati wa Mkapa kuna Mkuu mmoja wa Mkoa wa Arusha inasemekana (hatuna ushahidi) alikuwa anahongwa kilo moja ya TANZANITE kila mwezi na wawekezaji wa AFGEM.

Kilo moja ya TANZANITE "B" wakati huo ilikuwa Tshs 70 Mill.

Kwa hiyo, kila mwezi Mheshimiwa alikuwa anatudhulumu Tshs 70 Mill.

Aliposikia AFGEM kuna vuguvugu la kuwatimua alitishia kujiuzulu ukuu wa mkoa


Alipima Tshs 70 Mill alizotupora kila mwezi na mshahara wa ukuu wa Mkoa aliona hailipi.


Huyo ni Mkuu wa Mkoa, waziri wa madini na Mkapa hatujui lakini inabidi tuhisi ugali wao ulikuwa mkubwa maradufu ya huo.


Huu ndiyo uwekezaji wa TZ.


Lengo lake ni kuhamisha utajiri wa nchi na kuwanufaisha viongozi wa CCM wachache na ndiyo maana wamelishinikiza bunge wawekezaji wa aina hii ya DP WORLD wasilipe kodi za aina zote ambazo wengine wanalipa.


Mzigo wa kodi kwa wanyonge utaendelea kukua kwa kasi ya ajabu na kuwa shuhuda asiyepingika ya kuwa uwekezaji kutoka nje hauna tija kwa nchi zaidi ya kuchochea misuguano kwenye jamii.
 
You seem to argue from the angle of desperation. We still have the means of developing ourselves by collectively and timely coerce our crooks and thugs in upper echelons of power accountable to us. We need to come together and stand together and take them on shall we seriously and genuinely aspire to benefit from our resources and thereby develop ourselves. There is no uncle Tom who'll come to help us to achieve this sacred duty of ours for ourselves and future generations. We are our own impendements. Thus, we don't have to lament and weep like babies. This is my contribution to how we can make sense of our flag independence. Our politics has been monetised. Our fake,, greedy, myopic and opportunistic candy-asses have hugely betrayed us big time. We, too, have betrayed ourselves for being cowards and gullible creatures next to a collection of chickenhearted citizenry. It is squarely upon us to respond to the call of our own liberation from this archaic and obnoxious internalised internal colonisation presided over by black colonisers. Our presidents and PMs are our contemporary colonisers. We should neither respect nor trust them. If anything, they're but monstrosities that suck our blood and sweat for their amusement and enjoyment.
 

Racism in Arab world against black Africans is real and persevering
 
I fully subscribe to this view.

What we are detained to is kakistocracy- the worst leaders are clutching the reins of power no wonder they peek externalities as viable solutions to the internal issues.


The bribes have blinded their judgment this is why foreign investors are highly subsidized with tax exemptions that are not available to "mama ntilie"


What kind of leadership attracts foreign investment but creates laws that ensure those investors contribute nothing tangible to the Treasury?
 


WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS DON?


There's something diabolical about this Don, and we gonna piece it through as it is.

He says agitating on issues of the union risk tearing it into shards, but it his reasoning and specificities cited that we find weirdo. His whole contribution was aiming to erode all tools of accountability in the name of keeping the ambers of the union alive and subsisting! Well, we remind him individual consequences cannot be bailed out by this defence.

He says having the Zanzibara president and minister of transport signing a major agreement that essentially dole out mainlanders' prime assets to aliens is not an issue, we beam a totally different picture.


We say the duet ought to have sought our greenlight before plunging us into this perpetual servitude on an investment portfolio we need no external intervention.

They went to the subservient parliament after the agreement was signed to secure our approval! That move reduced our unelected parliament into a rubber stamp and a sham, which was not the intent of the framers of our constitution. The whole machinations pointed an accusing finger to an unenviable fact that our kleptocracy is now in the payroll of the Arabs raising serious concern that our hard earned sovereignty is now akin to Arabian masquerades.

His citation of infrastructure in mainland such as UDOM, among others, has zero correlation to the DP WORLD nightmares.

For start, all the infrastructural projects he painstakingly expounded were approved by the union parliament . In his own sake, not God's, why did he compare ratified budgets with the DP WORLD Agreement that was signed without parliamentary approval beats the odds.

The well learned Don lambasted us for poor English when he said that the stipulations in the DP WORLD agreement were plain English, when he claimed English law was Tanzanian law!


Well, English law will never be Tanzanian law. And, no matter the tonnage of gesticulating to the contrary, it will not fish him out.

The learned Don urged us to buy his lopsided argument that the agreement had time framework and was subject to termination but did not tell us the duration of the agreement nor was he capable of showing how we can extricate ourselves from this modern day slavery. The professor was anything but professorial during this discourse. He might have better days in his academic dispositions but not on this particular day, we are very much afraid to observe.


What we find a bit amusing is his domineering composure was well purposed to assert omniscience and invisibility, but thanks God, we are not that dumb..... His own ineptitude just found him out, so to speak.


Out of this discernment, other concerns rear their ugly hydra. We have come to an unpleasant conclusion our Don for esoteric reasons lacks critical analytical skills which brings us to the unpalatable query: How did his students fared at UDSM let alone his constituents from his lack of everything he needs in such titular?

A fatal combination of kleptocracy and kakistocracy in this country we call homey, ultimately, will lead to a civil war in this making Sudan bonfires look like childplay.
 
Dubai Ports World controversy


The Dubai Ports World controversy began in February 2006 and rose to prominence as a national security debate in the United States. At issue was the sale of port management businesses in six major U.S. seaports to a company based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and whether such a sale would compromise port security.

The controversy pertained to management contracts of six major United States ports. The purchaser was DP World (DPW), a state-owned company in the UAE. The contracts had already been foreign-owned, by Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company (P&O), a British firm taken over by DPW (completed in March 2006). Although the sale was approved by the executive branch of the United States Government, various United States political figures argued that the takeover would compromise U.S. port security.

U.S. President George W. Bush argued vigorously for the approval of the deal, claiming that the delay sends the wrong message to U.S. allies. Legislation was introduced to the United States Congress to delay the sale. On March 8, 2006, the United States House Committee on Appropriations voted 62–2 to block the deal. Despite President Bush's previous intention to veto the legislation, DP World announced on March 9, 2006 that they will drop the deal and transfer operations to a U.S. entity to defuse the situation.[1] Dubai Ports World eventually sold P&O's American operations to American International Group's asset management division, Global Investment Group, for an undisclosed sum.[2] The company is now known as Ports America.[3]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…