Plagiarism in academia

Plagiarism in academia

mku

mku

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Posts
88
Reaction score
9
It is so sad that we don't spend our times and efforts to come out with our own things. This is what happened to one of the renowned professionals in conservation from Congo who is also a director of the Study and Research Group on Biological Diversity in the Republic of the Congo. He is Serge Valentin Pangou. We have to be very conscious with plagiarism, it can tarnish your carrier and perhaps bury you out of academics. Hereunder is the story


Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Plagiarism leads to seven retractions (and counting) in the conservation literature

Serge Valentin Pangou

An ecology researcher in the Congo has found himself at the center of a plagiarism scandal that has felled seven of his papers.​
As Science reports today, Serge Valentin Pangou's work began unraveling in August 2011 after Wageningen University ecologist Patrick Jansen thought a paper he'd been asked to review for the International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation seemed familiar - because he'd written many of the same words in a 2007 paper in Conservation Biology. He ran the manuscript through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin, and sure enough, it was about 90% identical.​
Unfortunately for Pangou, Jansen's co-author on the Conservation Biology paper was Pierre-Michel Forget, whose father, as Science notes, "was a well-known private detective in France." Forget and Jansen took a careful look at a number of Pangou's papers,​
concluding that at least nine of them, published between 2006 and 2011, were plagiarized in whole or in part. An investigation by Science supports Forget's conclusions and also finds that some of Pangou's co-authors were unaware that their names were used.​
Read the Science report for details on the responses by the journals involved, which varied greatly in their speed. According to Science:​
Pangou tells Science that he accepts "all of the responsibility" for the papers that have already been withdrawn, but he contends that he did not deliberately engage in plagiarism, chalking it up to "the abusive utilization of bibliograph[ies]" which he "regrets sincerely." He did, however, admit to Science that he added some authors to papers without their knowledge.
​
The story is moving so quickly, in fact, that the number of retractions grew from four to seven in the time between when reporter Michael Balter filed it and it published today - and we understand there may be more in the works. Here are the papers that have either been retracted or whose editors have agreed to retract, Forget tells Retraction Watch:

Of note, five of the papers in question appeared in journals published by International Research Journals, a company that Jeffrey Beall has included in his list of "predatory open access publishers." Here's what he had to say about the company:
Another Nigeria-based operation, this publisher is notable (in a negative way) for its interesting journal issue covers (most are created from pirated photographs), and for the Gmail addresses its employees all use. The absurd banner on its main page shows a picture of part of a duckling swimming in a lake.
​
Those journals removed the papers from their sites altogether, which is not considered best practice by the Committee on Publication Ethics and others. (At the risk of sounding like uncultured Americans, we should admit that we had a chuckle at Forget's name, as in "he's trying to make scientists forget about Pangou's work," or "Pangou would just as soon forget about Forget." But we realize the words aren't pronounced the same way, and we are hardly trying to make light of what Forget is doing here - it's quite important.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register