Pornography

shmd65 said:

it may and it may not
this shall depend on the public policy that is in a particular country in Shaw v DPP it was against the public policy at that time in UK but the position now is different same as marriage cases were only on a single man vs a single woman as per Hyde v Hyde but now same sex marriage are enforciable in Uk courts and are recognized to be valid marriages as those in Hyde v Hyde
so if a country prohibits pornography under its laws then it shall be a crime as to that context

In other ways, Pornography is an individual matter that one can not restict one
CURT(const. United Rep.Tz) says, kila mtu ana haki ya faragha. . . . so one has a right to privacy if one feels like watching porn you can not restrict this person

Human Rights activists, will be a the ground that one has a freedom to do what he wishes so long they shall not affect the neighbour

therefore on the context of pornography it shall depend on the matter before you

Click to expand...

descarte said:

I understand you are arguing in the position of law,but lets imagine someone who has posted his or her pornographic photos on social media like Facebook. is the government legitimate to censor such material? based on morality because morality is superior domain to law

Click to expand...

Capt Nemo said:

posting oneself ponographic photos is legally prohibited in the general sense as walking naked in public...sheria inaweza isiwe specifi as to mention "posting pographic materials" in black and white kwa sababu amendment haijafanyika na kwa kuwa teknolojia ya kupost mambo haina muda mrefu hapa nchini kwetu..measures ambazo serikali ilichukua kabla ni kuzuia material ya namna hiyo kuingizwa nchini under customs law "prohibited goods"

Karibu

Click to expand...