Geeky
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 2, 2013
- 307
- 179
By Todd Moss and Madeleine Gleave,of the Center for Global Development.
It endeavors to show the pro and cons of the Power Africa initiative, what are the challenges and what are the stats on the energy poverty in Africa. The nice thing about this article is that it also samples Tanzania as one of the six Power Africa countries. The initiative is a grand vision of America and the Obama Admin to be realized soon but what exactly are the prospects of this vision ....
1. Energy poverty is an endemic and crippling problem; nearly 600 million people in Africa live without access to any power, which also means no access to safer and healthier electric cooking and heating, powered health centers and refrigerated medicines, light to study at night, or electricity to run a business. Here's the situation in the 6 countries chosen to be part of President Obama's Power Africa Initiative, home to nearly 1/3 of the continent's population:
2. Energy consumption in Africa is extremely low. Here's a comparison of average yearly electricity use for citizens in each Power Africa country versus the energy used by CGD fellow Todd Moss's fridge.
3. The International Energy Agency defines "modern energy access" as 500 kWh/year per urban household, or about 100kWh per person. (Rural households are defined at half this amount). How longdoes is take citizens in other parts of the world to burn through this much power?
4. What might be more reasonable estimates of how much power countries really need to satisfy the real demand at modern levels? Below we model unmet demand, using average consumption in Tunisia as a benchmark for a more modern energy level (or at least enough to power a TV and stove). Even with the 10 GW total generation goal for Power Africa, this leaves huge gaps.
5. To help meet demand, the US must rethink how it supports energy investment in developing economies. US policy has severely restricted investment in the very sources of power that Americans use most.
6. There are stark tradeoffs between this strict focus on renewables and increasing energy access. If OPIC had a $10 billion portfolio, we estimate it could help extend access to over 60 million more people by building more large-scale natural gas plants.
7. Reducing CO[SUB]2[/SUB] emissions is a critical goal, but it shouldn't be done on the backs of poor peopleliving in countries with the most need and the least emissions. Exempting Low-Emitting, Energy Poor (LEEP) countries from carbon restrictions and supporting them in affordable energy generation would help bring an end to energy poverty, in Africa and around the world.
It endeavors to show the pro and cons of the Power Africa initiative, what are the challenges and what are the stats on the energy poverty in Africa. The nice thing about this article is that it also samples Tanzania as one of the six Power Africa countries. The initiative is a grand vision of America and the Obama Admin to be realized soon but what exactly are the prospects of this vision ....
1. Energy poverty is an endemic and crippling problem; nearly 600 million people in Africa live without access to any power, which also means no access to safer and healthier electric cooking and heating, powered health centers and refrigerated medicines, light to study at night, or electricity to run a business. Here's the situation in the 6 countries chosen to be part of President Obama's Power Africa Initiative, home to nearly 1/3 of the continent's population:
2. Energy consumption in Africa is extremely low. Here's a comparison of average yearly electricity use for citizens in each Power Africa country versus the energy used by CGD fellow Todd Moss's fridge.
3. The International Energy Agency defines "modern energy access" as 500 kWh/year per urban household, or about 100kWh per person. (Rural households are defined at half this amount). How longdoes is take citizens in other parts of the world to burn through this much power?
4. What might be more reasonable estimates of how much power countries really need to satisfy the real demand at modern levels? Below we model unmet demand, using average consumption in Tunisia as a benchmark for a more modern energy level (or at least enough to power a TV and stove). Even with the 10 GW total generation goal for Power Africa, this leaves huge gaps.
5. To help meet demand, the US must rethink how it supports energy investment in developing economies. US policy has severely restricted investment in the very sources of power that Americans use most.
6. There are stark tradeoffs between this strict focus on renewables and increasing energy access. If OPIC had a $10 billion portfolio, we estimate it could help extend access to over 60 million more people by building more large-scale natural gas plants.
7. Reducing CO[SUB]2[/SUB] emissions is a critical goal, but it shouldn't be done on the backs of poor peopleliving in countries with the most need and the least emissions. Exempting Low-Emitting, Energy Poor (LEEP) countries from carbon restrictions and supporting them in affordable energy generation would help bring an end to energy poverty, in Africa and around the world.
