Raila Odinga: Statement On The Proposed Security Amendment Bill

Raila Odinga: Statement On The Proposed Security Amendment Bill

Ab-Titchaz

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Posts
14,630
Reaction score
4,253
10858625_606514356120631_5992256844329511146_n.jpg




STATEMENT ON THE PROPOSED SECURITY AMENDMENT BILL



Dear Kenyans;

On the eve of our nation's 51st independence anniversary, our country is on the verge of being taken back to the dark past that we thought we had put behind us forever.


Our freedoms are on the verge of being rolled back and our rights taken away in significant ways.

There is clear evidence that evil minds, geniuses in inventing the past, are at work in Jubilee and we need to remain alert and active.

As we meet here, a regime hell bent on reinventing the past is rushing through our National Assembly an amendment Bill that if passed, takes us back to the 1980s, although its consequences could be much worse.

That Bill is a major assault on democracy and fundamental rights. It also presents a major abuse to established Parliamentary procedures.

We can tell when danger is coming our way. We can tell when excuses are being invented to limit our rights and freedoms and institute dictatorship and personal rule. That moment is with us now.

With the Security Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2014 that is being pushed through the National Assembly today, we are firmly back to that afternoon on June 9 1982 when Kanu officially made Kenya a single party state.

What followed were gross human rights abuses, detentions, assassinations and suppression of political and social activities.

Coincidentally, the amendment Bill is slated to go through Third and final reading in the afternoon just as was the case in 1982. We must shudder at the thought that history can repeat itself.

In the 1970s and 1980s, the excuse for clamping down on our rights was that Kenyans needed unity for development to occur.

Today, the excuse for the draconian laws they intend to impose on us is war on terrorism. This is where it was always leading. We always said that something was afoot, that elements of security failures were induced to be used at appropriate time to roll back on the gains we have made.

We always suspected that President Uhuru Kenyatta and his Deputy William Ruto are uncomfortable with the Constitution and are looking for an excuse to take us to the old order and old days of Kanu hegemony.

The Kanu single party era, with its abuses, institutionalized corruption, muzzling of free press, freedom of association and freedom of thought remain the model for President Kenyatta and his deputy.

They are determined to take us back to that order. They think the right moment has arrived.
Kenyans must resist and CORD is prepared to lead the way.

Those of us who were old enough must tell those who were too young that there were days people were taken to courts at night, long after government working hours only to find a judge waiting to send them to jail.

That there were days when Kenyans were arrested and held incommunicado, without the benefit of a legal representation, all in the name of creating order. That there were days Kenyans were tortured, sometimes to death, in the excuse that those Kenyans were part of underground movements undermining or threatening the stability of the nation.

Those dark days are on their way back, with this Bill being rushed through the House.

They always begin as well-intended amendments in national interest. But they all end in a great deal of trauma and stagnation for the nation.
Let me give a few examples.

Under the Public Order Act , Jubilee wants to give the Cabinet Secretary powers to, via gazette notice, designate the areas where, and times at which public meetings, gatherings or public processions may be held.

This is unconstitutional. It seeks to limit right of peaceful assembly under Article 37 of the Constitution by making it subject to the whims of the Executive.

The Bill goes further to propose that any person who unlawfully convenes, organizes or promotes a public rally, meeting or procession or neglects or refuses to comply with any law relating to public meetings commits an offence.

Such a person will be held liable for any damage or loss suffered as a result of such public rally, meeting or procession.

Jubilee began testing this scare tactic on Saba Saba.

It violates the rules on Criminal Responsibility by making one liable for actions of others not his own. Its end aim is to let political activity take place only with the consent of those in power. We have been here before. We shall not go there again.

Jubilee is trying to give the Executive the power of declaring curfews instead of strengthening an independent police to do its work.

Jubilee wants to amend the Penal Code to provide a person who publishes or causes to be published or distributes obscene, gory or offensive material which is likely to cause fear and alarm to the general public or disturb public peace is guilty of a felony and is liable, upon conviction, to a fine not exceeding one million shillings or imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or both, or, where the offence is committed by a media enterprise, to a fine not exceeding five million shillings.

This is a manifest assault on freedom of expression under article 33(1) (a).

The only limitation to this right is stipulated under Article 33(2) and these are not included. It is an attempt to amend and expand that sub article through the back door and is manifestly unconstitutional

It also flies in the face of Article 34 (2) (b) by purporting to criminalize the content of broadcasts and publications. It is also clearly targeted at social media users especially in light of the recent criticism leveled against the President on insecurity. Given how it consistently lies, Jubilee clearly aims to ensure the truth never comes out.

In fact if they could they would have seized all CCTV footage of Westgate because it exposed their incompetence.

The Criminal Procedure Code is being amended to give police powers to hold suspects for more than 24 hours stipulated in the Constitution and to allow the prosecution not to disclose certain evidence on which it intends to rely if, among other considerations, the evidence is sensitive and it is not in the public interest to disclose.

This is an obvious infringement on the right to fair trial. We do not know who determines whether evidence is sensitive.

The Registration of Persons Act is being amended to provide that the Director of registrations may cancel the registration and revoke the identity card of any person issued under this Act.

This is a very dangerous proposal that has huge potential for political abuse. Citizenship, evidenced by an ID can only be revoked if it was obtained by registration (Article 17). This section makes no distinction.

Again it places the burden of proof as to why his ID should not be cancelled on the Citizen not the director. We are alive to those days when Kenyans woke up only to learn they cannot travel because their passports have been cancelled unilaterally.

These so called tough proposals on fighting terror come in the same week that in the US, investigations by the Senate concluded that the 'tougher methods' approved to fight terrorism after 911 were immensely abused and basically flopped.

Those investigations have shown that the reversals vis-a-vis rights weren't worth it - the terrorism problem has been worsened exponentially by the tactics employed by Bush-Cheney administration. Kenya is headed down the same path.

This is not the time for us to see ourselves as CORD or Jubilee supporters. This goes beyond party. The proposals being rushed through the National Assembly are going to affects us all and the future of our beloved country in fundamental ways some of us may not imagine right now.

Throughout the last two years however, as things steadily deteriorated and the bottom fell off our nation, the people have been fed a steady diet of empty platitudes, falsehoods, lies and promises.

We all ought to have got tired of a country where we see wrong and say nothing, where leaders perpetuate wrong with impunity, where our civil society is beholden to one side or the other while the country disintegrates, where even our Churches are silent and our people too afraid and too divided along ethnic and party lines to speak.

If tyranny, corruption and dictatorship have reared their ugly heads in our Nation, it is us the people who have allowed it to take root and have watered it with our apathy and our appeasement.

It must therefore be for us, all of us, to stop it and uproot it.

We lie in ruins and it is an ideal place to stop and rethink.
 
Wakenya wanatakiwa watambue kuwa JUBILEE ni KANU.
 
CORD ilikua imepanga kuzunguka nchini kwote Kenya kumtaka rais Uhuru Kenyatta
kujiuzulu,,pamoja na inspekta generali wa polisi na waziri wa usalama,, kwa mauaji
ambayo imekua ikisababishwa na Al-shabaab.

Kabla hata wajaanza hiyo safari yao ya kuwachochea wanainchi,,rais Uhuru
akamlazimisha inspekta generali,,bw Kimaiyo kujiuzulu na mara hiyo hiyo,,
kumuachisha waziri Ole Lenku kazi.

Kisha akauliza kwamba eti ni lazima apewe nguvu za kusimamia ulinzi Kenya
kwa kua na nguvu za kumteua mkuu wa polisi.

Kwa hivi sasa, rais hawezi kumlazimisha mkuu wa polisi kuchukua hatua
yeyote.

Nguvu alizo nazo,,rais wa Kenya,, ni kuhusu majeshi ya Kenya lakini si
polisi.

Sasa anata kuwajibika kikamilifu,,,ulinzi wa taifa kuwa mikononi mwake
lakini kwa hivi sasa hawa hawa wana CHORD walitaka kumsulubisha rais
Uhuru kwa makosa asio mikononi mwake.

Rais anataka eti magaidi wakishikwa, wasiwe wakiachiliwa kama vile inavyo
fanyika kwa hivi sasa.

Hii katiba ya Kenya inawalinda wageni hata kuliko wa Kenya.

Chord inataka eti misikiti katika Kenya kuwa na uhuru wa kua
na zana za kivita.

Chord ni chama ambacho kinalilia masilahi ya wangeni na magaidi.

Lakini hizi sheria zinaungwa mkono na wengi na hakuna chochote
kitazuia.

Poleni sana,,,wana CHORD,,,hakuna siku ile mtakua na bahati.

You are the greatest losers,,ever in the history of Kenya and
Africa.
 
KANU imerejea mlango wa nyuma waKenya watakujagua wameingizwa mkenge na Genge la JUBILEE.
 
naona majirani zetu wakenya wanarudishwa nyuma na hawa vibaka wawili ambao wameshindwa kuwalinda RAIA .
Wao kila siku ni kulia lia tuu.ama kweli Uhuru nchi imemshinda..ndio tatizo LA kujaza kabila moja na washikaji serikalini.
Kenya ki nchi ndogo Sana sio taifa gumu kulinda mipaka yake, ukizingatia imezungukwa na mataifa Rafiki, nashangaa wanapewa headache na wasomali kwa jina alshaabab.
Uhuru amewaangusha wakenya walio mchagua ..siku zote maandishi matakatifu yanasema, utawala wa dhuluma unalaaniwa ..haya yote ni dhuluma waliyofanya kupata madaraka.
 
Wakenya tuko chonjo kabisa...nguruwe, punda na damu chafu itamwaika katika mlango wa bunge..tumezoea maandamano tumezoea teargas... Uhuru wetu usipimwe wakenya
 
[h=5]Phil Wesonga
[/h]4 hrs ·
KTN just took Raila Odinga off-air when he was about to read this document to the country in a live event. Please share widely


TEN REASONS WHY THE SECURITY LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL IS DANGEROUS:


1. It takes away the right to assemble, demonstrate, picket and present petitions to public authorities. By giving the Cabinet secretary power to decide where and when people can assemble, demonstrate, picket and present petitions, trade union activity can now be neutralised, political activity can be controlled and government will become dictatorial.

2. It introduces a new type of law that makes people responsible for the actions of others. This is what they mean when they say a person convicted of convening a rally, meeting or procession will be made liable for any loss suffered. Trade unions will now be liable to companies for economic loses resulting from strikes or to the government for causing traffic jams.

3. It takes away the power to declare curfew from the Inspector General of Police to Cabinet Secretary. The decision to impose curfew will now not be made based on a professional security risk assessment but on the political grounds since the Inspector General has roles placed on him by the constitution but the Cabinet secretary has none.

4. It restricts the right of the people to receive information if that information is considered obscene, gory or offensive. The Act does not define what is "obscene", "gory", or "offensive" and this will now depend on the police. The Constitution has already stated what information is forbidden and the amendment is trying to add more restrictions.

5. It takes away the right of an accused person to be told what evidence the prosecution has. It is a basic right for an accused person that he must be informed what evidence will be used against him before the trial. We saw at the International Criminal Court at The Hague our President complaining that Prosecution was withholding evidence. He now must uphold for Kenyans the rights he was demanding when he was himself an accused person.

6. It requires an accused person to disclose his witnesses and evidence to the Police. It is another basic right for the accused that he cannot be compelled to disclose anything to the prosecution. We also saw our president protest very strongly at the ICC when the prosecution applied to Kenya to give the prosecution information. The president must also respect the same rights for the rest of Kenyans.

7. It institutionalises the military into our civilian institutions by putting them in the Firearms Licensing Board and Inter-agency security advisory committee. One great tradition of Kenya is that we keep our military out of civilian affairs. It is one of the reasons we remained stable when other Africa countries experienced military coups. Even today, countries that allowed the military into civilian affairs are the most unstable in Africa including Egypt, Nigeria, Uganda, North and South Sudan. Civilian authorities need to be replaced using civilian methods while military can only be removed by military.

8. It gives the right to any police officer to obtain information from landlords about tenants even without requiring the existence of an investigation against the tenant and suspend your driving licence. We know our police men and we know that allowing them to check on landlords is only opening up a new plantation for them to harvest where they did not sow. Susension of driving licenses is also a new cash cow for the police. All public service vehicle drivers and owners can expect the worst when police acquire this power.

9. It brings back to Kenya the dreaded special branch in a more lethal formation. The NIS now has power to enter and search premises and to take away any property that they want without having to get a warrant from court or being accountable to anyone. The decision is entirely that of the NIS officer.

10. It limits the right of the media to give true and accurate information. The restrictions on media under the proposed law would have made the entire media coverage of Westgate attack illegal. We would only have known what the Police wanted us to know. The coverage of Mandera attacks would also have been illegal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom