Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Green Beret said:

“Older men declare war. But it is youth that must fight and die.”
― Herbert Hoover


Ninaomba kuwakumbusha kuwa wasiojua historia wanayo hatari kurudia makosa yaliyofanyika hapo awali. Leo, nafanya linganisho la kuhuzunisha kati ya Vita vya Vietnam na mzozo wa sasa nchini Ukraine, nikitilia mkazo vitendo vya Marekani wakati huo na sasa (Mrusi naye alikuwa na yake!).

1. Idadi kubwa ya mabomu yaliyorushwa wakati wa Vita vya Vietnam inazidi hata yale yaliyotumiwa katika Vita Kuu ya Pili ya Dunia. Marekani ilifanya kampeni kali ya mabomu ya angani, ambayo ilisababisha vifo vingi na uharibifu wa miundombinu. Vivyo hivyo, katika mzozo wa sasa nchini Ukraine, matumizi ya mabomu pande zote mbili yamesababisha mateso makubwa na kupoteza maisha ya raia.

1. Kusikitisha, memo zilizofichuliwa za marais wa zamani wa Marekani zinaonyesha kwamba lengo kuu katika Vita vya Vietnam lilikuwa kuokoa heshima ya Marekani badala ya kuwalinda kikweli watu wa Vietnam. Asilimia ndogo tu ya juhudi zilielekezwa kwa ajili ya ustawi wao. Hii inaonyesha kutokuwa na uwazi wa maadili na kutanguliza masilahi ya binafsi juu ya masuala ya kibinadamu.

1. Kupuuza maadili wakati huo na sasa kunaonekana katika namna vita vinavyoshughulikiwa. Katika Vita vya Vietnam, Marekani ilihusika kuficha taarifa kwa wananchi wake, kama vile mashambulizi ya Laos na North Vietnam chini ya utawala wa Rais Richard Nixon. Leo hii, tunaweza kushuhudia tabia kama hizo kupitia kueneza propaganda ambayo haitoi taswira kamili ya mzozo wa Ukraine.

1. Matumizi ya silaha za kinyama nchini Vietnam, kama vile napalm na Agent Orange, yalisababisha madhara ya muda mrefu kwa mazingira na maisha ya binadamu. Katika mzozo wa sasa, matumizi ya mabomu ya kikundi (cluster bombs) yameleta wasiwasi mkubwa wa maadili, kwani bado yanatishia raia hata baada ya mapigano kusitishwa.

1. Sera ya kuhesabu miili kama kigezo cha ushindi, ambayo ilikuwa ikitumiwa wakati wa Vita vya Vietnam, imejitokeza tena katika muktadha wa Ukraine. Kuhesabu idadi ya vifo kama njia ya kupima ushindi ni ya kikatili na haitoshi, kwani haizingatii mateso na uharibifu unaosababishwa kwa binadamu.

1. Kuingilia kati maswala ya nchi za kigeni kwa kawaida huleta uharibifu zaidi. Kama ilivyoonekana nchini Vietnam, ahadi zilizotolewa kwa viongozi wa kigeni hazikuwa zote zilizotekelezwa, na hivyo kumwacha rais wa Vietnam Kusini katika wakati mgumu wa vita licha ya ahadi za Rais Richard Nixon. Vivyo hivyo, kuingilia kati nchini Ukraine bila kuelewa kabisa matokeo ya muda mrefu kunaweza kusababisha machafuko na madhara zaidi kwa watu wa eneo hilo.

1. Ni muhimu kutambua kwamba uvamizi wa Urusi nchini Ukraine pia hauna msingi. Diplomasia inapaswa kuwa njia kuu ya kutatua migogoro, kwani ukali tu ndio unaochochea mateso.

[

1. Kwa hitimisho, nawaonya dhidi ya kushangilia vita na kuchukua upande. Hakuna washindi katika vita; waathirika halisi ni raia wa eneo hilo ambao wanabeba gharama kubwa ya mzozo. Tunapaswa kujifunza kutokana na historia, kutetea amani, na kuhimiza ulinzi wa maisha ya wasio na hatia. Kama baba, nawasihi tafuta suluhisho kupitia mazungumzo na uelewa, kwani ni kwa njia ya diplomasia tu tunaweza kujenga njia kuelekea ulimwengu bora na wenye amani zaidi. Asante.

“When the rich wage war it's the poor who die.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre



View attachment 2697784

Click to expand...

kp kipanya44 said:

Putin said that Russia withdrew from the grain deal because it allegedly failed to fulfill its humanitarian purpose of reducing the risk of famine in the poorest countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

According to the Russian dictator, the grain deal "was shamelessly used exclusively to enrich large American and European businesses that imported and resold grain from Ukraine."

Join our telegram channel for more videos - link in comments

#

Sent from my Infinix X660B using JamiiForums mobile app

Click to expand...

kp kipanya44 said:

.View attachment 2697790

Sent from my Infinix X660B using JamiiForums mobile app

Click to expand...

mohamedidrisa789 said:

[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] hii mifumo ya Patriot kiukweli hamna kitu kabisa, ni bora usiwe nayo ili ujue kabisa upo free.cheki kilichotokea hapa yani kwa kweli ni aibu.View attachment 2697464

Click to expand...

Proved said:

Kweli kabisa, Lukashenko ni kibaraka wa Putin na anaitegemea mno Urusi kusalia madarakani.
=========================

Putin is invading Belarus by stealth - analysis​

By Sean Bell, military analyst
Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko met Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier today, ostensibly to discuss developing a strategic partnership between the two countries.

Lukashenko is a "puppet" of the Putin regime and has been described as the "last European dictator".

President Putin framed the discussions as Russia providing security guarantees to Belarus.

Any attack on Belarus will be considered an attack against Russia and will provoke an appropriate response.

However, behind the rhetoric, Russia is steadily increasing the number of Russian military forces in Belarus.

Russia has mounted military operations against Ukraine from Belarusian soil. It has launched air attacks from Belarusian airfields and Russia has recently forward-deployed tactical nuclear weapons on its neighbour's soil.

Ove the past few days, Wagner military personnel have moved into "temporary" camps in Belarus and are apparently being used to train the Belarus military.

Putin has made no secret of his desire to create a buffer-zone between Russia and the West.

He invaded Ukraine to stop it joining NATO and despite the invasion faltering, Putin remains focused on securing a buffer - the Donbas - between the two countries.

By infiltrating Belarus with thousands of Russian military soldiers, Putin is invading Belarus by stealth.

If Putin does seize Belarus, what would the West do in response?
When Russia invaded Ukraine, President Zelenskyy asked for international support, which the West was very happy to provide.

However, President Lukashenko would be very unlikely to ask for support in the event of a Russian coup.

In practice, there would be very little the West could do in response, despite the fact that such a move would be as unwelcome by the Belarusians as it was to Ukrainians.

A very worrying period for the Belarusian population.

Ukraine war latest: 'Drone attack' in Moscow - as Russian strategy 'could give Putin way out of war'

Click to expand...

Russian foreign ministry condemns Ukraine drone strikes and vows retaliation​

“We regard what happened as another use of terrorist methods by the military-political leadership of Ukraine, intimidation of the civilian population. These attacks had no military meaning,” the foreign ministry said in an official statement published Monday.

Click to expand...

kp kipanya44 said:

Vijana wakakamavu wa rais zelensiky wanazidi kukomboa ardhi Yao[emoji1255][emoji1255][emoji123][emoji123]


[emoji298]During the offensive operation in the Berdiansk direction, the Defense Forces succeeded and advanced into the enemy's depths at a distance of 350 meters to 1.4 kilometers.[emoji298]



Sent from my Infinix X660B using JamiiForums mobile app

Click to expand...