Ab-Titchaz
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 30, 2008
- 14,630
- 4,253
And the cocaphony of sycophancy goes on....
Richie Maccs
Charge corrupt people in a court of law, and if found guilty, jail them. People should not just resign and go home with the loot. And if they stole or grabbed land, go after them, freeze their accounts, recover the money or land, and throw them in jail. State of the Nation Address and 'ululations of wonderful speech, Mr.
President' will not effect an institutional culture change of 'zero tolerance... on corruption' in Kenya. We need more. And instead of requesting people to 'step aside for investigations', which we know many will not because evidence is yet to be tabled and discussed, fire people with questionable integrity and recruit clean hands.
I suppose the civil service has internal institutional mechanisms for dealing with issues of employee misconduct and impropriety. We don't see private companies sending employee misconduct dossiers to the courts and waiting to see what the court will think of the evidence.
Action must be taken swiftly against all cases of corruption in the public service, without the pretenses and excuses and hiding behind elephant speeches.
And why are all these Independent Commissions sending their investigations to the President, as opposed to the DPP? Is it the President's job to decide who gets charged and who doesn't? Or its for cleaning the list - to make sure the top-top cream remains spotlessly clean?
And Parliament, must they discuss such reports? And how they top the list of shame? Cases of corruption should be dealt with in a court of law.
Richie Maccs
Charge corrupt people in a court of law, and if found guilty, jail them. People should not just resign and go home with the loot. And if they stole or grabbed land, go after them, freeze their accounts, recover the money or land, and throw them in jail. State of the Nation Address and 'ululations of wonderful speech, Mr.
President' will not effect an institutional culture change of 'zero tolerance... on corruption' in Kenya. We need more. And instead of requesting people to 'step aside for investigations', which we know many will not because evidence is yet to be tabled and discussed, fire people with questionable integrity and recruit clean hands.
I suppose the civil service has internal institutional mechanisms for dealing with issues of employee misconduct and impropriety. We don't see private companies sending employee misconduct dossiers to the courts and waiting to see what the court will think of the evidence.
Action must be taken swiftly against all cases of corruption in the public service, without the pretenses and excuses and hiding behind elephant speeches.
And why are all these Independent Commissions sending their investigations to the President, as opposed to the DPP? Is it the President's job to decide who gets charged and who doesn't? Or its for cleaning the list - to make sure the top-top cream remains spotlessly clean?
And Parliament, must they discuss such reports? And how they top the list of shame? Cases of corruption should be dealt with in a court of law.