Total SA seeks to add Lokichar's oilfields to Hoima-Tanga pipeline

Total SA seeks to add Lokichar's oilfields to Hoima-Tanga pipeline

Geza Ulole

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Posts
65,136
Reaction score
91,917
Total's cautious Maersk deal brings far-reaching opportunities


London (Platts)--22 Aug 2017 717 am EDT/1117 GMT




Total surprised markets Monday with a $7.5 billion purchase of Denmark's Maersk Oil and Gas that should give it 200,000 b/d in the early 2020s, most of it oil, presenting the deal as a cautious investment in stable countries albeit one that includes some more adventurous opportunities.

  • Big North Sea projects renew portfolio
  • No change to Uganda-Tanzania pipeline plan
  • Iran, North Africa synergies in focus

The deal might appear contrarian given that rivals such as BP and Shell have been scaling back in the North Sea due to the reducing size of most oil field assets there.

082217-maersk-oil-key-assets-web.jpg


Total said it also would take over Maersk's $2.9 billion in decommissioning obligations, but this did not represent a material cost for some decades.

Total has long declared a commitment to the North Sea, exemplified in the $5 billion Laggan-Tormore gas project it brought on stream last year.

The Maersk acquisition, expected to bring 160,000 b/d of production as soon as next year, renews Total's North Sea portfolio with some big new projects.

It gains an 8.44% stake in Norway's giant Johan Sverdrup complex, due on stream at the end of the decade, a 49.99% stake in the UK's Culzean gas and condensate field, due on stream in 2019, and a 31.2% stake in Denmark's Tyra gas field, an aging asset set for redevelopment.

Article continues below...


Digital Commodities Summit
November 14, 2017 | ETC County Hall | London, UK

Look beyond the hype and examine the challenges facing peer-to-peer trade using blockchain. This new event is uniquely positioned for today’s energy companies along with other commodities such as agriculture, metals and petrochemicals. understand the latest DLT developments; what it can and cannot fix for energy trading, cybersecurity, regulation, legislation, adoption strategies, technological issues and key blockchain pilot initiatives.

View Agenda and Register

Overall, Maersk's Oil asset portfolio includes around 1 billion barrels of oil equivalent of proven and probable reserves, more than 80% of which are in the North Sea.

"The North Sea in the company has been a cash cow for many years, so I'm happy to be able to combine" these assets, Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne told a conference call. "What we are creating is a North Sea leader."

Following some recent fiscal incentives granted by Denmark's authorities, the Tyra redevelopment will be approved early next year, Pouyanne said.

He went on to present the deal in cautious terms, saying it would nudge up Total's debt gearing level by only a couple of percentage points and would not change its planned capital expenditure range of $15 billion-$17 billion annually.

The deal is far from being in the league of Shell's $54 billion purchase of BG last year, sitting with Total's more cautious approach: Pouyanne noted it is Total's biggest transaction since the mergers of Elf, Petrofina and Total early in the millennium.

But it could help Total leapfrog rival Chevron in lifting its oil and gas production to 3 million b/d of oil equivalent at the end of the decade, assuming Johan Sverdrup goes to plan.

MAERSK UPSTREAM WOES

The relatively modest price tag, two-thirds of the payment being in the form of Total shares, partly reflects some recent misfortunes for Maersk.

Early last year it was hit by a $2.6 billion accounting impairment, before going on to lose the operatorship of Qatar's main oil producing field, Al-Shaheen, to Total. The loss, effective from July, will see Maersk's oil and gas output drop to average from 215,000-225,000 boe/d this year from 313,000 boe/d in 2016.

Although Maersk Oil will contribute 160,000 boe/d to Total's production next year before the portfolio returns to growth, Total said the volumes represent "high margin" production with cash flow breakevens below $30/b.

Due to existing operational and commercial overlaps mainly in the North Sea, Total said it expects to capture synergies of $400 million a year from the deal.

Pouyanne went on to say the addition of North Sea assets would "balance the country risk" in Total's portfolio, offsetting some more difficult locations such as Nigeria.

In reality it may also help lessen risks associated with Brexit, as Total will move its North Sea business base from London to Copenhagen. At the same time it could also strengthen Total's hand at the frontiers of the industry.

Having been the first international company to sign a development deal with Iran since the lifting of sanctions, with a contract to develop the South Pars gas field, Total may now hope for additional rewards, as Maersk has been in the running to develop the South Pars "oil layer," above the gas field.

EAST AFRICA DOMINANCE

The deal also helps consolidate Total's position in East Africa, adding Maersk's stake in Kenya's South Lokichar oil fields to the company's existing Lake Albert assets in Uganda.

Pouyanne said there would be no impact on a plan to build a long-delayed export pipeline from Uganda across Tanzania to the coast, a project the company wants to sanction in the first half of next year, following an inter-governmental agreement between Tanzania and Uganda earlier this month.

It might be possible, however, to combine transportation of the Kenyan assets, a subject to be discussed with partner Tullow Oil, he said.

"We are focused on Uganda and in Uganda we have progressed quite a lot on the project, with an agreement which has been signed between Uganda and Tanzania early August," Pouyanne said.

The Maersk acquisition "does not impact the development plan that we have on the Uganda resources for the Tanzania pipeline. It's a priority for us. We want to sanction that project first half 2018, and so we'll not change our plans on Uganda, but maybe we'll see if we can be efficient and participate in the development of Kenya," he said.

Asked to justify Total's investment, Pouyanne stressed the deal was bringing with it additional expertise, following a hiring freeze at Total since 2014, and highlighted Maersk's expertise in managing chalk reservoirs offshore Denmark, of use in Lower Cretaceous reservoirs found in the Middle East, North Africa and North America.

"There is an expertise which is of interest to us and, combining with our own positions in the Middle East and North Africa, I'm sure will generate more added value," he said.

Synergies are also likely in Angola, where Total is a major player and Maersk is operator of the Chinssonga discovery, Pouyanne said.

--Nick Coleman, nick.coleman@spglobal.com
--Edited by Lisa Miller, lisa.miller@spglobal.com and Jeremy Lovell, jeremy.lovell@spglobal.com

Total's cautious Maersk deal brings far-reaching opportunities - Oil | Platts News Article & Story

MY TAKE
People in here will dispute me but i am confident of my predictions as i know this field far more than many of the people in here. I am starring at Tanga as undisputed oil capital while Mtwara is on the onset with shell US$ 54 bln acquisition of BG group. Kenya is a toddler in this business will keep yapping and yapping while pros keep executing!
 
I am still worried though, that Kenya might have back doored Total SA to reconsider Lokichar oilfields following their initial failure on the pipeline deal with Uganda.

In my opinion though!

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
hahah Kenya ipi hiyo hii field Kenya wapo nyuma sana! hamna kampuni ya mafuta in global top 5 inaweza ku-guarantee pipeline to nowhere! the next stop Tullow Kenya inanunuliwa kama Tullow Uganda ilivyofanywa!
 
Hehe that ceo dah, what the heck has he been smoking lately, and by the way totals acquisition of mearsk kenya assets are still subject to gok's approval which has not happened as yet, we ll wait for keters word on the matter.
Anyhows, total is thinking of building a pipeline 500 km West to join the Uganda pipeline, assuming they can even get permission from Uganda, which is assuming a lot. Heck, our government, just out of spite, might refuse to let them do it. Even if they can pull it off, Lokichar oil will be traveling roughly 2000 km to get to the ocean, twice as far as the reasonable southern Kenya route.[emoji15]
 
Hehe that ceo dah, what the heck has he been smoking lately, and by the way totals acquisition of mearsk kenya assets are still subject to gok's approval which has not happened as yet, we ll wait for keters word on the matter.
Anyhows, total is thinking of building a pipeline 500 km West to join the Uganda pipeline, assuming they can even get permission from Uganda, which is assuming a lot. Heck, our government, just out of spite, might refuse to let them do it. Even if they can pull it off, Lokichar oil will be traveling roughly 2000 km to get to the ocean, twice as far as the reasonable southern Kenya route.[emoji15]
When Museveni said the Hoima-Tanga pipeline is for all East African countries including Kenya I knew he was up for something as he must have been hinted of developments. Plse refer the Chogolani clips I posted..

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
1.No one saw Total buying maersk, not even the oil industry community.

2.Total buying of maersk was not for Kenyan oil but for a combination of much bigger markets elsewhere like in northern zone...

3. Anyone with half a brain can see the connection (Tullow/Total Maersk/Tullow Maersk/Total) they are connected withing yhe EA zone having worked together at one point right here withing EA


All those things we already know, what we care about is GoK and Tullow reactions
 
It makes economical sense kwa Kenya kutumia Tanga port. As much "kichwa ngumu" GoK might be, but Tanga could've save them money by using the facilities which are already there and the location of Tanga port makes much more sense because of it ability to operate whole year round. Kenya can also talk to GoT and put proposal of buying a stake in Tanga port.
 
When Museveni said the Hoima-Tanga pipeline is for all East African countries including Kenya I knew he was up for something as he must have been hinted of developments. Plse refer the Chogolani clips I posted..

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app


I for see Total taking a turn and supporting the Hoima-Lokichar-lamu project, because there is no way Kenya's oil can be transported through Tanzania yet there is no a drop of oil in Tanzania ,the pipeline deal is back in Kenya ,guys watch out .
 
1.No one saw Total buying maersk, not even the oil industry community.

2.Total buying of maersk was not for Kenyan oil but for a combination of much bigger markets elsewhere like in northern zone...

3. Anyone with half a brain can see the connection (Tullow/Total Maersk/Tullow Maersk/Total) they are connected withing yhe EA zone having worked together at one point right here withing EA


All those things we already know, what we care about is GoK and Tullow reactions
A bankrupt Tullow right? GoK can not bully oil giants as they guarantee any loan the poor GoK will try to raise for pipeline construction! This is oil my friend n not tea n milk n u r dealing with Total a top 5 oil giant in the World..[emoji23] [emoji115]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
What I like about no brainer but full of ego n emotions argument from Kenyans in here is that the more they argue the more proofs r emerging. As far as i remember I started telling people the pipeline will pass through Tanzania 3 years back n most of u including Uhuru vehemently argued only to discover I was accurate later on.

Then I predicted South Sudan is to join, most of u refused to accept n just before the dust settled, Total acquired oil supply n distribution assets in Kenya, Uganda n Tanzania, then acquired exploration blocks around Lake Tanganyika basin Tanzania's side then DRC officially asked to join the Hoima-Tanga pipeline. Thereafter Total acquired a $900 mln stake in Tullow Uganda n now has acquired a $7.5 bln Maersk.

I am now telling u people either Tullow Kenya or the whole of Tullow will be acquired by Total as they have muscles to consolidate every oil field to one pipeline n reap maximum profit. And Tanga is to become oil port capital of East Africa n Kampala headquarter of oil businesses.

Suppose GoK plays hard on Total's decision to join Lokichar oilfields to Hoima-Tanga pipeline, Total can choose to delay bringing to the market the oil found there. Afterall is insignificant 600mln barrels. They can afford to ignore.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

SUNDAY AUGUST 27 2017

RIG.jpg


An oil rig in Kenya’s Turkana County. PHOTO FILE | NATION

In Summary

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.


olingo.jpg

By ALLAN OLINGO
More by this Author

French oil giant Total, which is consolidating its position in the region’s extractives sector through its full acquisition of Maersk Oil and Gas stake in Kenya’s South Lokichar oilfields, plans to push for discussions that would see Kenya’s oil transported through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.

On Monday, Total announced that it had acquired 100 per cent equity stake in Maersk oil and gas in a share and debt transaction worth $7.5 billion.

Already, the company increased its shareholding in the existing Lake Albert assets in Uganda in January, after buying out Tullow’s 21.57 per cent stake worth $900 million.

READ: Total Kenya parent firm buys Maersk Oil in $7.5 bn deal

Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne said at a press conference in Paris that the acquisition of Maersk would not have any impact on the plan to build the long-delayed export pipeline from Uganda across Tanzania to the Coast.

“We want to sanction this project in the first half of next year, following an inter-governmental agreement between Tanzania and Uganda earlier this month.

However, it might be possible to combine transportation of the Kenyan assets, a subject to be discussed with partner Tullow Oil,” Mr Pouyanne said, adding that the progress has been good, with an agreement already signed between Uganda and Tanzania early this month.

Total said the acquisition of Maersk could now allow the firm to participate in the development of the Kenyan assets.

Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.

Kenya had sought to convince Uganda to move its oil through the Lamu Port, but after it lost out to Dar es Salaam, it announced that it would still proceed with the Lamu pipeline project. It is estimated the project would cost $2.5 billion with the government expected to offset part of it.

“We will now have to do the needful by identifying where this pipeline will pass and also address the financing question. We are only getting 20 per cent of the funding from the Exchequer. This means that the difference has to be funded under the public-private partnership,” Kenya’s Energy Cabinet Secretary Charles Keter said then.

Tullow Oil, which holds a 50 per cent interest in Lokichar exploration and the Kenyan government said it would be forging ahead with construction groundwork with works set to conclude in 2021. However, both have been quiet on the progress of this venture.

Total’s plan, if sanctioned, could save Kenya the $2.5 billion. But this would be at the expense of both national pride and the LAPSSET project, which had been envisaged to open up the northern part of the country that has remained underdeveloped.

Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

“We are yet to get any notification from our oil development partners on this suggestion over a preferred route, so I cannot give a response to that,” Kenya’s Petroleum Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau said.

It is expected that the French conglomerate, with millions of dollars in its research and development budget, will lobby Kenya and Tullow to choose the Ugandan pipeline route as a cheaper option.

“For Kenya, the discussions on using the Ugandan pipeline will be a difficult as it is also keen on achieving other development objectives within its territory.

map.jpg


The French oil giants now effectively sees it as a partner in Kenya’s blocks 10BB, 13T and 10BA where it will now own 25 per cent interest, while Tullow retains a 50 per cent interest in the blocks, Africa Oil’s stake remaining at 25 per cent. GRAPHICS NEWS

However, if it can manage to have both the pipeline and production from the same company, then it has a best bet on price, especially when the revenues starts flowing in,” said Eric Musau, an analyst at Standard Investment Bank.

Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.

Uganda has indicated that it will be able to determine its pipeline’s final cost before the end of this month, even as it emerged that one of the project’s lead financial advisers — Standard Bank Uganda [ a joint financial adviser with Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp] — was already planning to raise $3 billion by the second half of next year.

“We are finishing on the details of the financing that will be contained on the Front End Engineering Design study which will be ready by the end of the month. Once we have the actual cost, then we will task our financial advisers to assist with fundraising,” Energy and Minerals Minister Irene Muloni said.


Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

SUNDAY AUGUST 27 2017

RIG.jpg


An oil rig in Kenya’s Turkana County. PHOTO FILE | NATION

In Summary

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.


olingo.jpg

By ALLAN OLINGO
More by this Author

French oil giant Total, which is consolidating its position in the region’s extractives sector through its full acquisition of Maersk Oil and Gas stake in Kenya’s South Lokichar oilfields, plans to push for discussions that would see Kenya’s oil transported through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.

On Monday, Total announced that it had acquired 100 per cent equity stake in Maersk oil and gas in a share and debt transaction worth $7.5 billion.

Already, the company increased its shareholding in the existing Lake Albert assets in Uganda in January, after buying out Tullow’s 21.57 per cent stake worth $900 million.

READ: Total Kenya parent firm buys Maersk Oil in $7.5 bn deal

Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne said at a press conference in Paris that the acquisition of Maersk would not have any impact on the plan to build the long-delayed export pipeline from Uganda across Tanzania to the Coast.

“We want to sanction this project in the first half of next year, following an inter-governmental agreement between Tanzania and Uganda earlier this month.

However, it might be possible to combine transportation of the Kenyan assets, a subject to be discussed with partner Tullow Oil,” Mr Pouyanne said, adding that the progress has been good, with an agreement already signed between Uganda and Tanzania early this month.

Total said the acquisition of Maersk could now allow the firm to participate in the development of the Kenyan assets.

Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.

Kenya had sought to convince Uganda to move its oil through the Lamu Port, but after it lost out to Dar es Salaam, it announced that it would still proceed with the Lamu pipeline project. It is estimated the project would cost $2.5 billion with the government expected to offset part of it.

“We will now have to do the needful by identifying where this pipeline will pass and also address the financing question. We are only getting 20 per cent of the funding from the Exchequer. This means that the difference has to be funded under the public-private partnership,” Kenya’s Energy Cabinet Secretary Charles Keter said then.

Tullow Oil, which holds a 50 per cent interest in Lokichar exploration and the Kenyan government said it would be forging ahead with construction groundwork with works set to conclude in 2021. However, both have been quiet on the progress of this venture.

Total’s plan, if sanctioned, could save Kenya the $2.5 billion. But this would be at the expense of both national pride and the LAPSSET project, which had been envisaged to open up the northern part of the country that has remained underdeveloped.

Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

“We are yet to get any notification from our oil development partners on this suggestion over a preferred route, so I cannot give a response to that,” Kenya’s Petroleum Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau said.

It is expected that the French conglomerate, with millions of dollars in its research and development budget, will lobby Kenya and Tullow to choose the Ugandan pipeline route as a cheaper option.

“For Kenya, the discussions on using the Ugandan pipeline will be a difficult as it is also keen on achieving other development objectives within its territory.

map.jpg


The French oil giants now effectively sees it as a partner in Kenya’s blocks 10BB, 13T and 10BA where it will now own 25 per cent interest, while Tullow retains a 50 per cent interest in the blocks, Africa Oil’s stake remaining at 25 per cent. GRAPHICS NEWS

However, if it can manage to have both the pipeline and production from the same company, then it has a best bet on price, especially when the revenues starts flowing in,” said Eric Musau, an analyst at Standard Investment Bank.

Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.

Uganda has indicated that it will be able to determine its pipeline’s final cost before the end of this month, even as it emerged that one of the project’s lead financial advisers — Standard Bank Uganda [ a joint financial adviser with Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp] — was already planning to raise $3 billion by the second half of next year.

“We are finishing on the details of the financing that will be contained on the Front End Engineering Design study which will be ready by the end of the month. Once we have the actual cost, then we will task our financial advisers to assist with fundraising,” Energy and Minerals Minister Irene Muloni said.


Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

SUNDAY AUGUST 27 2017

RIG.jpg


An oil rig in Kenya’s Turkana County. PHOTO FILE | NATION

In Summary

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.


olingo.jpg

By ALLAN OLINGO
More by this Author

French oil giant Total, which is consolidating its position in the region’s extractives sector through its full acquisition of Maersk Oil and Gas stake in Kenya’s South Lokichar oilfields, plans to push for discussions that would see Kenya’s oil transported through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

Such a decision, still at the wishful thinking stage, would have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s grand infrastructure project — the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia-Transport Corridor (Lapsset) — which includes an oil pipeline.

On Monday, Total announced that it had acquired 100 per cent equity stake in Maersk oil and gas in a share and debt transaction worth $7.5 billion.

Already, the company increased its shareholding in the existing Lake Albert assets in Uganda in January, after buying out Tullow’s 21.57 per cent stake worth $900 million.

READ: Total Kenya parent firm buys Maersk Oil in $7.5 bn deal

Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne said at a press conference in Paris that the acquisition of Maersk would not have any impact on the plan to build the long-delayed export pipeline from Uganda across Tanzania to the Coast.

“We want to sanction this project in the first half of next year, following an inter-governmental agreement between Tanzania and Uganda earlier this month.

However, it might be possible to combine transportation of the Kenyan assets, a subject to be discussed with partner Tullow Oil,” Mr Pouyanne said, adding that the progress has been good, with an agreement already signed between Uganda and Tanzania early this month.

Total said the acquisition of Maersk could now allow the firm to participate in the development of the Kenyan assets.

Last year, Total used its influence, through several high level meetings with the presidents of both Uganda and Tanzania to successfully convince the Dar es Salaam and Kampala administrations to choose the Uganda-Tanzania route over Kenya’s route.

Kenya had sought to convince Uganda to move its oil through the Lamu Port, but after it lost out to Dar es Salaam, it announced that it would still proceed with the Lamu pipeline project. It is estimated the project would cost $2.5 billion with the government expected to offset part of it.

“We will now have to do the needful by identifying where this pipeline will pass and also address the financing question. We are only getting 20 per cent of the funding from the Exchequer. This means that the difference has to be funded under the public-private partnership,” Kenya’s Energy Cabinet Secretary Charles Keter said then.

Tullow Oil, which holds a 50 per cent interest in Lokichar exploration and the Kenyan government said it would be forging ahead with construction groundwork with works set to conclude in 2021. However, both have been quiet on the progress of this venture.

Total’s plan, if sanctioned, could save Kenya the $2.5 billion. But this would be at the expense of both national pride and the LAPSSET project, which had been envisaged to open up the northern part of the country that has remained underdeveloped.

Kenya says it is unaware of any preference by Total for the Kenyan oil to be moved through the Uganda-Tanzania pipeline.

“We are yet to get any notification from our oil development partners on this suggestion over a preferred route, so I cannot give a response to that,” Kenya’s Petroleum Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau said.

It is expected that the French conglomerate, with millions of dollars in its research and development budget, will lobby Kenya and Tullow to choose the Ugandan pipeline route as a cheaper option.

“For Kenya, the discussions on using the Ugandan pipeline will be a difficult as it is also keen on achieving other development objectives within its territory.

map.jpg


The French oil giants now effectively sees it as a partner in Kenya’s blocks 10BB, 13T and 10BA where it will now own 25 per cent interest, while Tullow retains a 50 per cent interest in the blocks, Africa Oil’s stake remaining at 25 per cent. GRAPHICS NEWS

However, if it can manage to have both the pipeline and production from the same company, then it has a best bet on price, especially when the revenues starts flowing in,” said Eric Musau, an analyst at Standard Investment Bank.

Uganda and Tanzania, together with the oil firms are working on the projects financing blueprint that will see the two countries raise 70 per cent of the total costs from international lenders.

Uganda has indicated that it will be able to determine its pipeline’s final cost before the end of this month, even as it emerged that one of the project’s lead financial advisers — Standard Bank Uganda [ a joint financial adviser with Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp] — was already planning to raise $3 billion by the second half of next year.

“We are finishing on the details of the financing that will be contained on the Front End Engineering Design study which will be ready by the end of the month. Once we have the actual cost, then we will task our financial advisers to assist with fundraising,” Energy and Minerals Minister Irene Muloni said.


Total seeking Kampala-Dar pipeline route for Kenya oil

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom