Uhuru, Ruto respond to Cord poll petition

President elect Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto have both filed responses to a petition by the Cord coalition challenging the outcome of the March 4 general elections.
In his response, the President elect has said the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission conduct a free and fair poll stating that he beat Cord’s presidential candidate Raila Odinga fairly.
He said the difference of more than 800,000 votes between himself and the runner’s up Raila in the Presidential poll is “wholly significant” and clearly demonstrates the will of the Kenyan people.
He added that numerous observers gave the process a clean bill of health stating that petitioners have “exaggerated facts and peddled outright falsehood” to invalidate the elections.
Ruto in his petition has also stated that the IEBC conducted a transparent election and the results reflected the will of the people.
He said Cord’s allegations are devoid of any proof and are a result of the petitioner’s “bitterness” arising from the loss. He stated that the petition has no legal basis.
The Cord coalition has filed a petition challenging the election of Jubilee alliance’s Uhuru Kenyatta as the president of Kenya. IEBC chair Isaack Hassan who declared the result on March 9 filed his response to the petition earlier this morning. Hassan said Cord has failed to provide enough evidence to make the Supreme Court invalidate the result of the elections.

Uhuru, Ruto respond to Cord poll petition | The Star

Cord wait for 2018 election

Du hapa ina maana Raila kajishitaki mwenyewe, duuu

"It therefore follows that the petitioner had a critical role in the identification and eventual purchase of the BVR kits. The petitioner cannot therefore either find a cause of action arising from his participation in the purchase of the BVR kits and/or benefit from the ultimate partial failure of the electronic systems," he contends.

bemg said:

Cord wait for 2018 election

Click to expand...

How older will Raila be in 2018?
Failling to be president this time it means his chances of being Kenya president is almost imposible in 2018.

Black Uhuru said:

​

Kenyatta said that IEBC was not constitutionally bound to use the Biometric Voter Identification (BVI) or an electronic system of transmitting election results.

"It is a fundamental misconception of the law for the petitioner (Odinga) to contend that either registration of voters, identification of voters or transmission of the votes cast was required by law to be done via an electronic system," Kenyatta's reply reads in part.

He adds that Odinga's claims about the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) are hypocritical as he had last year called for a return to the manual system and declared that ‘Kenyans did not want the BVR system.'

"Following consultations between the president, the petitioner and the 1st respondent (IEBC), a decision was made to procure the BVR Kits from the Government of Canada in a government-government deal. The Cabinet meeting at which the decision was made was chaired by the president and the petitioner," he says.

"It therefore follows that the petitioner had a critical role in the identification and eventual purchase of the BVR kits. The petitioner cannot therefore either find a cause of action arising from his participation in the purchase of the BVR kits and/or benefit from the ultimate partial failure of the electronic systems," he contends.


Uhuru: Raila case ‘expression of bitterness after loss' | Capital News

Click to expand...

Hii ndio habari bana. Kumbe alihusika kununua hizo mashine, !!!!!!

hizi sababu za uhuru ni dhaifu sana against za cord. They better come with facts. Siyo kwa sababu electronic system ilishafeli marekani au ghana nako iwe guarantee zitafeli hapa.

Hapa hamna kitu, kama response yenyewe ndio hii sioni uhuru atachomokaje hapa

Kimanzichana said:

Hii ndio habari bana. Kumbe alihusika kununua hizo mashine, !!!!!!

Click to expand...

Waziri mkuu ndo mtendaji mkuu wa serikali, hii kesi ni ngumu sana kwake. Inatakiwa Raila aonyeshe kufeli kwa machine kulim-feva Uhuru na hakukum-feva Raila, hapo ndo kasheshe linaanza. Ama njama za kufeli machine hazikufanywa na waziri mkuu dhidi ya Uhuru, bali Uhuru dhidi ya waziri mkuu.

Uhuru ana akili sana ....odinga alidhani kwa kuwa uhuru ana kesi ICC basi atamshinda kwenye uchaguzi .....Uhuru na Ruto ni magenius sana wa siasa za kenya na kwa mtazamo wangu ni ma stasticians wazuri sanaaaaa...

lane said:

hizi sababu za uhuru ni dhaifu sana against za cord. They better come with facts. Siyo kwa sababu electronic system ilishafeli marekani au ghana nako iwe guarantee zitafeli hapa.

Hapa hamna kitu, kama response yenyewe ndio hii sioni uhuru atachomokaje hapa

Click to expand...

uwe unasoma vitu mpaka mwisho sio unarukia tu...raila naye ana akili za hivo kama wewe ndo maana ana challenge mitambo aliyohusika kununua..sasa hizo akili au mautumbo ya bata

MkamaP said:

Waziri mkuu ndo mtendaji mkuu wa serikali, hii kesi ni ngumu sana kwake. Inatakiwa Raila aonyeshe kufeli kwa machine kulim-feva Uhuru na hakukum-feva Raila, hapo ndo kasheshe linaanza. Ama njama za kufeli machine hazikufanywa na waziri mkuu dhidi ya Uhuru, bali Uhuru dhidi ya waziri mkuu.

Click to expand...

Mkuu umesema vizuri sana. Jamaa emeshika mkaa wa moto. Tusubiri wakuu wa Supreme Court waseme, lakini, RAO najua atapinga matokea ya Court, huo ndio utamaduni wake tokea azaliwe.

Huyu jamaa anazeeka vibaya sana. Poor CORD.

Raila alishachemka tena inaaminika ushahidi anaoutoa kwenye mikutano yake ni ya uongo sicho alichowakilisha mahakamani anauaminisha umma waamini ana ushahidi wa kutosha ili akipigwa chini aseme mahakama imewaonea. Ndio mana kila kukicha anatafuta idara au kitengo kipi kichunguzwe ili apate ushahidi mpya pasipo kujali muda umekwisha wa kuwasilisha ushahidi wake Uhuru chapa kazi Raila hajawahi kukubali matokeo hata katika ngazi ya chama na alikataa uchaguzi ndani ya chama alipogundua mudavadi atampiga chini ndo kisa cha mudavadi kumkacha.

By Black Uhuru

​

Kenyatta said that IEBC was not constitutionally bound to use the Biometric Voter Identification (BVI) or an electronic system of transmitting election results.

"It is a fundamental misconception of the law for the petitioner (Odinga) to contend that either registration of voters, identification of voters or transmission of the votes cast was required by law to be done via an electronic system," Kenyatta's reply reads in part.

He adds that Odinga's claims about the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) are hypocritical as he had last year called for a return to the manual system and declared that ‘Kenyans did not want the BVR system.'

"Following consultations between the president, the petitioner and the 1st respondent (IEBC), a decision was made to procure the BVR Kits from the Government of Canada in a government-government deal. The Cabinet meeting at which the decision was made was chaired by the president and the petitioner," he says.

"It therefore follows that the petitioner had a critical role in the identification and eventual purchase of the BVR kits. The petitioner cannot therefore either find a cause of action arising from his participation in the purchase of the BVR kits and/or benefit from the ultimate partial failure of the electronic systems," he contends.


Uhuru: Raila case ‘expression of bitterness after loss' | Capital News

Click to expand...

RAO is done.