Ujamaa- Elimu ya Kujitegemea: Ni wapi tulipotea?


Rev Kishoka:

You have raised a very important point. And I think one of the reasons why we aren’t creative or aren’t able to use our education to address basic society need is the structure of the education system. Our education system is a performance-based system in the sense that it rewards those who perform better in their exams, in particular the final exams. So instead of relating classroom instructions and their applications in real life, students and educators spend considerable amounts of time memorizing facts or reviewing past papers.

In this type of learning environment, it will be very hard to instill students and their educators the value and application of education for self-reliance. This is because the main goal isn’t to learn how to apply the education in one’s environments, but to pass the final exam and receive the accolade.

In many developer countries, what your teacher or instructor gives you in school counts. For example, if your teachers and school recognize you as an A student because you perform well in exams, you will be recognized as an A student. You won’t need to sit for exams from a special board to confirm that. What’s unique about this system is that students don’t spend a considerable amount of their time performing examination drills. Instead, they engage in education activities that are very important to them and their communities.

Take for example a Tanzanian primary school student who about to finish his/her studies. This kid probably knows more about geography than a college professor in America. The kid will tell you the capital of Peru, Tanzania and Bhutan. On contrary, an average college professor in America cannot think of the capital names of these countries off the top of his head. He will have to search the web or consult a world map. Now, from a Tanzanian perspective, the American professor should have known these. However, from an American perspective, it is good to know world capitals, but this knowledge is trial and doesn’t improve the well being of individuals or society.

And this brings me to the question in your last paragraph “would have the 2nd year engineering student failed to design a hanging walk bridge?”. The answer is yes or no. If the student was taught that the principles of simple machines in primary school, the theories of physics in secondary and high schools have applications in real world, the student will design and build the bridge. However, if the main activity in school was to drill student to pass exams, the student won’t be able to apply the knowledge.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…