Nimefuatilia sana hukumu be it rulings/judgements za waheshimiwa majaji wa Rufaa linapokuja suala la tafsiri ya Court of appeal rules, nimeona hakuna consistency. Hii inatokana na scenario kadhaa.
1. Overiding objectives enactment: Kila kundi la majaji (watatu katika kesi husika) wanatoa maamuzi wanayoafikiana wao kama wao na si kufuata/ hakuna guiding principle ya kufuatwa na Court of appeal as a whole.
2. Rule 106 (deleted subsection 9 and its replacement) of court of appeal rules (as amended 2017 amendments majaji are not predictable)..1) wanaweza waka dismiss, 2) wakasema endela na oral submission etc
Wanasheria/mawakili tusaidieni hapo.
1. Overiding objectives enactment: Kila kundi la majaji (watatu katika kesi husika) wanatoa maamuzi wanayoafikiana wao kama wao na si kufuata/ hakuna guiding principle ya kufuatwa na Court of appeal as a whole.
2. Rule 106 (deleted subsection 9 and its replacement) of court of appeal rules (as amended 2017 amendments majaji are not predictable)..1) wanaweza waka dismiss, 2) wakasema endela na oral submission etc
Wanasheria/mawakili tusaidieni hapo.