So far, experience point out judicial independence has been retrenchment not entrenchment of our norms and practices of the court which is to uphold the rule of law
The high court had agreed with the plaintiffs that it was unconstitutional to apply new pension law retrospectively at a time those who had their pension had matured were already enjoying their well earned sweat
They quashed and ser aside a lower court decision despite clear reading of the constitution over retrospective laws can't curtail rights before their enactment
In the east African pensioners convoluted matter we saw an evil axis conjoining the high court and the appeals court to deprive granting pensioners their statutory dues
Shockingly, when it comes to enforcement of a decree the high court had passed the same court claimed it wasn't privy to the details of their agreement