If there were errors the parties were informed and obviously rectified them. The burning query is after preliminary verification were parties notified on writing of the errors if any? If they were notified then when receiving the final forms was there a checklist of contents of forms handed to the complainants after the forms were handed over? Or the exercise was carried out informally? If informally, NEC will need to exculpate itself how can it prove beyond reasonable doubt without a written checklist form it received forms with major discrepancies? Obviously in such cases the benefit of doubt goes to the plaintiffs...
Is is prior or after the handing over of the forms the court will for obvious reasons be curious to know just to establish whether it was an error of the victims or election officials tampered with the documents
In other cases election forms issued by NEC to CDM were not genuine lacking many features in order to disqualify them that the forms they returned were tampered with or fake or counterfeit
The high Court will need to know from NEC what procedures were they using to ensure the forms it issued were official and couldn't be replaced or tampered with
CCM diehards never ask themselves why their darling party treats them like livestock and permit them to get away ferrying them like livestock taken to an abattoir or to livestock market with tractors and lorries
When will they demand proper passenger buses and refuse boarding tractors and lorries?
But we know the real reason is the powerlessness of the electorate is too ingrained in their visceral minds that they surrender to being treated like dejected animals!
CCM treatment of poor peasants despicable and tells us more about their ulterior motives more than anything else particularly when you factor in the billions they milk us as subsidies yearly