Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

The first two charges are diametrically opposite to one another and both cannot stand together!

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

sodoliki said:
I think there is a big merit on this , we need long term plans, and not knee jerking reactions, we have rattled the mining sector, but we still depend on them for economic growth, we have put IPTL on notice, but we don't have enough electricity, we have enacted a law for all teleco's companies to list on DSE, but we are still stifling local economy, how are we going to go forward.

Thanks, will revisit your thoughts in much great detail sometimes in the future

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Either the conspiracy was external only or the conspiracy was both external and internal

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Good news for drafters of this charge sheet....you can still ask the court to amend it

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

My suggestion will be reconcile the two first charges to ensure conformity to them either the conspiracy is both external and internal or external only or internal only but not tolerating such glaring anomalies

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Charge two alleges the conspiracy involved unnamed public officials who are not even charged

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Why are these public officials not disclosed and how can the accused defend themselves against cryptic criminal charges

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

May I now state confidently the rights of the accused to a fair hearing have been irretrievably taken away on two legal limbs

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

First, failure of charge sheet to disclose the conspirators

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Secondly, failure to charge the undisclosed conspirators amount to discrimination prosecution

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Discrimination of any form is unconstitutional

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

The charge is ultra vires by "Misjoinder of the accused"

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

This ground is sufficient to throw out this case

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Intriguingly, the charge two alleges institutional collusion to commit the theft of public funds

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

BOT, STANBIC & MKOMBOZI BANK have been mentioned as collaborators but not a single individual is charged!

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Shockingly, charge five and six are silent on which institution was purloined!

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

Presumably, the drafters must be out of their minds to consider sustaining a criminal conviction upon ghost victim or victims

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

The amounts of money mentioned in charge five and six are spurious

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

There is in place a High Court decision which ordered Tanesco and IPTL to form an impartial committee to sort out payment obligations Tanesco owed IPTL

Rutashubanyuma · Jun 21, 2017

So it was wrong for charge number six to allege an disclosed legal person suffered colossal losses to that tune for a simple reason part if not the whole money in the escrow account belonged to IPTL

Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member

JF-Expert Member