Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

So somewhere in between the two protagonists may reach an amicable settlement

The Chairperson could be the chief justice who is an executive appointee

The secretary of the Board could also be an executive appointee

Two representatives from the court of appeal, high court, resident magistrates court, and primary court should appease judicial representation

Equal gender and democratically elected by the relevant represented grouping

Four advocates reflecting gender and democratically elected qualifications ought to sate lawyers feelings of alienation

Attorney general and two representatives from civic organizations who are democratically elected reflecting gender requirements ought to cap any complaint of misrepresentation

The Board will 17 strong membership with no ministerial appointment save for the secretary of the Board who ought to have a presidential appointment

Well some fights not worthy fighting, and this one is a case in point

If partisanship not wisdom has its way there will be unnecessary fracas and it is the rule of law which will suffer

As I have repeatedly reiterated without justice peacemakers stand zero chance of putting together shards of discontent

Nia njema ni kuweka huu mjadala kwenye lugha hii lakini Mamlaka makubwa ambayo Rais anapewa na hii miswada jamani labda kama hamjaisoma by the way POMBE SIO CHAI

Mathias Raymond Nyakapala said:

Nia njema ni kuweka huu mjadala kwenye lugha hii lakini Mamlaka makubwa ambayo Rais anapewa na hii miswada jamani labda kama hamjaisoma by the way POMBE SIO CHAI

Click to expand...

Tuwekee nakala zake hapa

Our criminal prosecution scenario is different from the American one

So Guantanamo Bay comparison was in bad taste

Guantanamo Bay not in American soil but Cuban one so American laws inapplicable there

All those charged locally, our laws are applicable rendering Guantanamo Bay comparison inexcusable

Most of our criminal laws subject to abuse and that is a talking point

I am straining to comprehend how a criminal persecution can be tolerated by our courts and sustained for years without prosecuting the case on frivolous and vexatious excuses that the evidence is incomplete

If the prosecution cannot or is unwilling to prosecute a case on insufficient evidence then the proper decision of the court is to strike out the criminal case with leave for the prosecution to reinstitute it once they have sufficient evidence to sustain their prosecution case

This ought to apply even to murder cases