err, Djibouti port is even much closer to Addis, and they already have an electric rail and road connection, and yet Ethiopia is still looking for other routes.
the distance between Eritrea and Addis is 1,230km, the distance from Lamu to Addis is Around 1,400km, relatively speaking, that distance is negligible, Not to forget the border region between Eritrea and Ethiopia is so mountainous that non of the two countries dared to invade the other because they knew it was a logistical nightmare, there is a 600m steep climb in altitude, any infrastructure project to create a seamless connection will be more costly...
On the other hand, The $1B Addis Isiolo highway will be complete next year, The s.sudan kenya highway too is also under construction
And why are you comparing the economies of UG vs Tz???? in this argument, Tz is not in the same category as UG, compare TZ with Kenya because they both have access to the sea, Uganda is a transit destination, just like Rwanda..... For tz rail to get to Ug border, it will have to go through Rwanda, Burundi..... No one knows when that will happen, Tz keeps ground breaking and awarding tenders but as long as actual construction hasnt started yet, its all just paper castles, and dont also forget, to get to the Ugandan border is just the first step, Uganda then has to construct the rail from the border to the big cities...when and if that happens is unknown variable too.
Also, here is Ethiopia rail masterplan - you will notice both the rail link to Kenya is in phase two, the rail ling to Eritrea doesnt get to the border
Before a handshake btn President of Eritrea and Prime Minister of Ethiopia. Now omit a link to Kenya and put up a link to Asmara.
Warming of Ethiopia-Eritrea relations puts proposed LAPSSET mega-project under microscope
26 SEPTEMBER 2018
Map of proposed LAPSSET mega-corridor in East Africa. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.
SUMMARY
- Thawing of relations lessens Ethiopia’s potential need for proposed Kenyan port
- Concerns remain about environmental and social impacts of mega-infrastructure project
The rationale for a proposed new East African mega-corridor development, the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor, has been thrown into question by the renewing of diplomatic relations between Ethiopia and Eritrea. Local campaigners, civil society organisations and researchers had previously raised serious concerns about the environmental and social impacts of LAPSSET, which is partially funded by the World Bank.
LAPSSET
describes itself as “Eastern Africa’s largest and most ambitious infrastructure project, bringing together Kenya, Ethiopia and South Sudan.” It consists of seven different infrastructure projects – including a controversial new deep-water port in Lamu, Kenya. Altogether LAPSSET is expected to cost around $25 billion, and, as summarised in a July
profile by online media outlet
African Arguments, “involves building thousands of kilometres worth of highways, railways and oil pipelines,” to facilitate regional cross-border trade. The World Bank agreed to provide a $500 million
loan to finance part of the proposed LAPSSET highway network through northern Kenya in 2017. However, a July
report by Kenyan newspaper
The Standard pointed out that the recent thawing of relations between Eritrea and land-locked Ethiopia could potentially render LAPSSET “obsolete”, as Ethiopia may gain access to Eritrea’s port in Asmara as a result of this seismic shift in regional geopolitics, thus lessening its potential demand for Lamu Port.
The Bank-financed highway that is part of LAPSSET runs through Turkana county in northern Kenya, between Lokichar and Nakodok (on the South Sudan border). The county is Kenya’s largest and poorest, with 79 per cent of people living below the national poverty line. Oil was discovered in Turkana county in 2012, with a planned 820km export pipeline linking Turkana county’s oil fields to Lamu Port forming a key aspect of LAPSSET. However, as
noted by
African Arguments in July, “in Lokichar, the epicentre of Turkana’s oil industry, the boom has so far brought more frustration and conflict than hope. The British company Tullow Oil has opened the oil fields, but many are frustrated that this has not led to more jobs and benefits for those who have lived on the land for generations. Members of the herding community around the village of Nakukulas have barricaded roads in protest.” A 2017
reportby Oxfam International found that Tullow Oil had failed to achieve free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) from local communities in Turkana county affected by the oil fields. According to Oxfam International, Tullow receives financing from the International Finance Corporation (IFC, the Bank’s private investment arm) for its oil operations in Turkana county, and FPIC is required under IFC’s Performance Standards.
[LAPSSET] involves building thousands of kilometres worth of highways, railways and oil pipelines AFRICAN ARGUMENTS
Concerns have also surrounded the development of Lamu Port, which could
affectthe UNESCO World Heritage site at Lamu Old Town.
Protests have also erupted against plans to build a coal-fired power plant in the vicinity of Lamu Port, with the African Development Bank
considering providing finance for the project.
LAPSSET represents just one of many planned ‘mega-corridors’ in developing regions, supported by the Bank and other international finance institutions (see
Observer Spring 2018,Winter 2017). As noted by online media outlet
AfricaRenewal, the “LAPSSET project [is viewed] as a major contribution to the African Union’s regional integration vision of a … fully integrated continent by 2063,” which will see LAPSSET’s proposed transportation infrastructure eventually extend to Douala, Cameroon, via Juba, South Sudan – enabling the creation of integrated trans-African transport infrastructure between East and West Africa.
As highlighted in a December
report by Belgium-based CSO network Counter Balance, however, such mega-corridors risk promoting a model of development that is incompatible with climate action and the Sustainable Development Goals: “The building of planned mega corridors would … mean locking-in the current extractivist development model. This agenda … is largely reliant on fossil fuels, mining and large-scale agribusiness.”
Warming of Ethiopia-Eritrea relations puts proposed LAPSSET mega-project under microscope - Bretton Woods Project