Yaliyojiri Mahakamani kesi ya Mbowe na wenzake: Shahidi wa 13, Tumaini Sostenes Swila kuendelea kutoa ushahidi wake Februari 9, 2022

Beautiful
 
NewOrder said:
Kati ya mashahidi walioharibu kabisa kesi hii upande wa mashtaka ni huyu afande. Unaweza kuona hilo kwa namna mawakili wa mashtaka wanavyozuia utetezi ili shahidi afanyiwe wepesi...
Click to expand...
Maana yake ni kuwa ushahidi ulijengwa around mashtaka badala ya ushahidi kuwa kithibitisho cha mashtaka!!!
 
NewOrder said:
Good analysis. Worry not about the judge, utaona hata yeye sasa amekuwa tofauti na mwanzo! Imefikia wakati wa yeye kuangalia atakuwa nini baada ya hili - ameanza kukataa mapingamizi...
Click to expand...
Kilichoniogopesha zaidi ni majibu ya “sifahamu” ya polisi wetu wa ngazi za juu. Kama honesty na professionalism inakosekana chini ya kiapo, hali ikoje kwa askari wa chini watakaofanya mambo huko mitaani bila kujali viapo vyao. Tuna wakati mgumu sana, ndio maana matumizi ya nguvu kupindukia ni jambo pendwa kwenye chombo hiki![emoji848][emoji2827]
 
Retired said:
A very good observation! There is a complete u-turn to the mode he now perceives the issues! Hii habari ya kila kitu sijui itaufanya ushahidi wake to have little weight! I guess he does not know the consequences of his "sijui"......
Click to expand...
What happens if a witness in a trial doesn't tell the truth?

You must tell the truth when testifying. Lying in court is a crime called perjury, and you can be sentenced with a jail term of up to 14 years. ... If you refuse to answer a question that the judge allows, you can be found in contempt of court and sent to jail for a short time.
 
Effective cross-examination can make the difference between winning and losing a trial. Although cross-examination can be the part of trial that is the most fun for experienced trial lawyers, preparing good cross-examination takes a lot of thought and hard work
 
Kesi ya ugaidi dhidi ya Mbowe na wenzake, imetufumbua macho wananchi kutambua kuwa limejaa maofisa wagonjwa.

Wakati wa utoaji ushahidi, Kamanda Kingai, inspecta Ndowo, Mahita, Jumanne, na sasa inspecta Swila, hakuna hata mmoja aliyeweza kumaliza kipindi cha kudodoswa na mawakili wa utetezi bila ya kuomba ahirisho kwa sababu za kwenda chooni au kuumwa.

Funga kazi ni kwa inspector Swila, inspector wa chooni, kama ambavyo wengi sasa wameanza kumwita. Huyu kila baada ya masaa yasiyozidi mawili lazima aende chooni, na leo ameona break ya chooni haitoshi, ameomba ahirisho la siku nzima.

Hili ni jeshi gani ambalo maafisa wake wote wanaumwa? Kweli usalama wa wananchi utegemee kutoka kwa askari ambao viongozi wao wote ni wagonjwa? Mashahidi raia, wengine hawakuwahi kuomba kwenda washroom wala kuomba ahirisho, ili askari ndio wanaoonekana ni dhaifu kupindukia!

Amiri Jeshi Mkuu, wafanyie uchunguzi hawa makamanda wa Polisi, hakuna mwenye uhakika wa usalama wake kwa kulindwa na mtu dhaifu. Kigezo kimojawapo muhimu kwa askari ni lazima awe mkakamavu na mkamilifu wa afya. Askari ambaye hawezi kuzuia haja yake (mkojo au haja kubwa) japo kwa masaa mawili anawezaje kuwa na uwezo wa kutimiza majukumu yake? Huyu inabidi kila anapokuwa ni lazima kuwepo na gari la kubeba choo au avae bukta za kuzuia choo kisidondoke. Mgonjwa wa namna hii, kweli ana sifa ya kuendelea kuwa askari?
 
Kabla ya kulaumu hebu tujuzwe kwanza endapo kwenda chooni mara kwa mara ni afya au ugonjwa.
 

 
Kama hilo ndiyo lengo, amepotea kabisa.Kibatala anakwenda kujipanga upya, na shahidi atahojiwa kwa siku 2 zaidi ili kudhihirisha uovu na ujinga wa hawa watu.

Hata siku moja akiki haizidiwina kichwakitupu.

Watambue kuwa Rais naye anawasubiria ili ajikoshe dhidi ya huu uwendawazimu wa hawa punguani.
 
Learned brother, that is basically how the system should work but trust you me - none of these witnesses will be purged! It is unfortunate that truth is measure by the verdict (just after final submissions) and not during the process (including during testifying and cross-examination). You will have noticed a retained lawyer cannot use words like "you are lying". Witnesses do not refuse to answer truthfully, they deceitfully say "I do not know, i am not aware" etc. They choose not to divulge information and there is no way the judge can tell between a lie and truth. Predetermined positions from prosecution are all over and contradictions are rampant - they you hear prosecution demanding restrictions on defense's line of questioning. You hear repetitions being curtailed even though wanting to check previous answers is one way to ensure consistency.

I want to believe the way our laws are written is top class. When it comes to how proceedings go - this is a different ball game altogether. A judge is told we cannot have a witness in court and all he says is "hakikisheni anafika mahakamani". A witness says "I have a movement order in a hotel room" and a judge does not demand its presentation in court to prove defense right or wrong. And the thing dies just like that and the witness disappears into the woods!!

If a witness does not tell the truth, they are not helping the judge reach a just verdict and the judge is responsible for dispensing justice!! A lie-telling witness must be purged! The problem is how does the judge know if all they do is listen to arguments instead of asking follow up questions to unearth the truth?? I so very much want the judges to be involved and ask important questions! You will have also known that only one piece of a mishap in court proceedings could force a mistrial submitted by the defense and the judge can award that. In our case, there will not be a mistrial if a judge mentions a court case, the court run will have to end with conviction or no conviction. Our justice system as a whole has a long way to go.
 
Mawakili wa serikali kila wakiona mchongo unabuma shahidi lazima augue wapate nafasi ya kuandika futuhi upya
Hopeless kabisa ndio maana mikataba ya madini tumepigwa sana
 
Asante sana kwa hizi updates
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…