boniuso
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 13, 2013
- 951
- 1,348
I think what you saying is human are born incomplete to environment tha other animals, but humans are very intergent than other living creature.
I think what you saying is human are born incomplete to environment tha other animals, but humans are very intergent than other living creature.Animals never let the weakest or least intelligent members lead their groups, unlike humans.
Man thinks he is smarter than animals because he built a house. But animals can survive in snow, heat, and water. They sleep and wake up fine in the wild. He can not. He needs walls, heat, and protection. He is the only creature that cannot survive without shelter. And he calls that intelligence.
He thinks he is smart because he built airplanes. But animals came fully equipped with wings and low risk of crashes. They do not need runways. They do not need fuel. They do not need training. They just fly. He spends years learning to do what a bird does the day it hatches. And he calls that progress.
He thinks he is smart because he invented the car. But the truth is that he was born slow. Animals came with fully equipped speed. They can outrun him. They can outlast him. They can escape danger without a machine. He needs an engine to do what a cheetah does with its legs. And he calls that superiority.
He thinks he is smart because he invented pots, knives, and cooking. But animals came fully equipped with sharp teeth and stomachs that can survive raw food. He spends hours preparing a meal while they eat and move on. He can not digest what they eat and can not hunt what they hunt without weapons. He can not survive what they survive. And he calls that advancement.
He thinks he is smart because he invented clothes. But animals came fully equipped with feathers and fur. His body is born weak against the weather. He shivers in the cold. He burns in the sun. He is the only creature that can not endure the elements. And instead of admitting that, he shamed his own naked body. He called it sin and shame. He called it something to hide.
The reality is that man is not smarter than animals. He has been trying to catch up with them for a long time. And in the process, he created himself labor, washing, cooking, and struggle. While animals just eat and sleep. They are complete. He is always catching up. And he calls himself superior because he has not yet caught up.
I'm out.
Your argument is an exquisite example of false equivalence, reductionism, and teleological confusion masquerading as profound philosophy.
You mistake biological specialisation for superiority. A cheetah is faster because evolution confined it to speed. An eagle flies because evolution confined it to flight. A shark survives underwater because evolution confined it to aquatic life. None of them can transcend the narrow parameters of their biological programming.
If human is intelligent, why does he need to study the nature first before designing something?Humans, however, are not defined by anatomical perfection but by cognitive plasticity, abstract reasoning, and cumulative culture. We were not born with wings, so we engineered aviation. We were not born with fur, so we invented textiles. We were not born with claws, so we developed tools. That is not evidence of inferiority—it is evidence of unparalleled adaptability.
Your premise commits the naturalistic fallacy by assuming that what exists in nature is inherently superior. By that logic, parasites and viruses would represent the pinnacle of evolution simply because they require no technology.
Animals survive within ecosystems. Humans redesign ecosystems.
Animals adapt to environments. Humans transform environments.
Animals inherit instincts. Humans accumulate knowledge across generations.
Ironically, you typed this argument on a device conceived through mathematics, physics, metallurgy, semiconductor engineering, satellite communication, and computer science—all products of the very intelligence you are attempting to diminish.
If humanity were merely "catching up," then explain why no other species has produced science, medicine, philosophy, civilisation, space exploration, or artificial intelligence. Evolution produced countless extraordinary animals, but only one species capable of comprehending evolution itself.
That distinction is neither accidental nor trivial.
I agree that animals also adapt and prepare for danger, but the difference is the level and method of preparation.Hicho unacho kiita intelligence unathibitishaje unacho?
Kwa sababu hata wanyama wengine wana adapt na ku prepare kuepukana na natural disasters.
Sasa kitu ni kilekile afanyacho mwanadamu.
Mwanadamu ana adapt, ana prepare na kusave live. Wanyama pia wakiona hali ya hatari kama ukame wanahama eneo hilo haraka. Wana prepare vilevile.
Wala hakuna intelligence yoyote hapo.
Mwanadamu mwerevu anashindwaje kuzuia magonjwa yasiwepo kabisa duniani?Wewe umekaza tu fuvu unabishia mambo ambayo ni most obvious.
Ndani mzuri ni kuhusu maambukizi ya magonjwa.
Binadamu siku zote yupo mstari wa mbele kupambana na magonjwa kwa kuvumbua dawa na tiba.
Wewe hapo unaeza ukaumwa ukatibiwa na ukapona kbsa.
Na vipi kuhusu wanyama na ndege? Chukulia tu mfano wa kuku, kuku wakipata tu homa wanaeza wakapukutika ndani ya siku mbili Tu.
Swali langu ni je, hao hao wanyama unaodai ni werevu kuliko binadamu wanaeza kujitibia magonjwa wenyewe?
Sawasawa.Hata wanyama wapo madume wanaokulana wenyewe au watoto wanakulana na wazazi.
Unlike wanyama na ndege binadamu Walsh ana uwezo wa kuyatibu na kuyazuia hayo magonjwa yasienee.Mwanadamu mwerevu anashindwaje kuzuia magonjwa yasiwepo kabisa duniani?
Hiyo human intelligence ilishindwaje kuondoa na kudhibiti magonjwa yasiwepo kabisa duniani?
Kwa sababu kuku hana hiyo akili ya kutibu wala kuzuia chochote.
Lakini Mwanadamu unayedai ana akili kashindwa kuondoa kabisa magonjwa yasiwepo duniani.
Sasa hii ni akili gani inashindwa kuondoa magonjwa yasiwepo kabisa duniani?
Hii unayoita Akili ya binadamu bado imeshindwa kuelewa kwa nini tupo hapa duniani.I agree that animals also adapt and prepare for danger, but the difference is the level and method of preparation.
Mnyama akihama wakati wa ukame anafuata mostly instinct na biological signals. Human intelligence inaonekana pale tunapoweza kuelewa sababu za tukio, kukusanya taarifa, kufanya predictions, kuunda technology, na kupanga suluhisho hata kabla hatujakumbana na tatizo.
Kama adaptation pekee ndiyo ingekuwa kipimo cha intelligence, basi kila kiumbe kinachobadilika kingekuwa na kiwango sawa cha akili. Lakini uwezo wa kutengeneza maarifa mapya, kuyahifadhi, na kuyatumia kubadilisha mazingira ndiyo unaotofautisha binadamu.
Mnyama ambaye hana akili ya kutambua uwepo wa ugonjwa unaoweza kumwangamiza na binadamu mwenye uwezo wa kutambua ugonjwa na majanga yawezayo kumwangamiza lakina hana uwezo wa kuzuia yasiendelee kumwangamiza, wana utofauti gani?Unlike wanyama na ndege binadamu Walsh ana uwezo wa kuyatibu na kuyazuia hayo magonjwa yasienee.
Vipi kuhusu mnyama ambaye hata akili ya kutambua tu uwepo wa ugonjwa unaeza kumuangamiza?
Yaani ikitokea huyo mnyama akipata maambukizi binadamu asipoweka juhudi za kumtibu huyo mnyama atapukutika ndani ya siku chache
Intelligent kwenye nini?I think what you saying is human are born incomplete to environment tha other animals, but humans are very intergent than other living creature.
Kabisa.Katika wanyama wapumbavu, binadamu ni namba moja.
Ni kweli akili ya binadamu bado ina mipaka. Hatuelewi kila kitu kuhusu ulimwengu na hatuwezi kudhibiti kabisa nguvu za asili kama matetemeko ya ardhi, radi au vimbunga.Hii unayoita Akili ya binadamu bado imeshindwa kuelewa kwa nini tupo hapa duniani.
Akili ya binadamu imeshindwa kuelewa na kudhibiti hali za kimazingira kama radi, vimbunga, matetemeko ya ardhi na mafuriko.
Tumeshindwa kutatua hali zote hizo, imebidi na sisi tu-adapt hivyo hivyo tu.
Hichi tunachoita human intelligence mbona kuna vitu vingi tu kwenye mazingira tunashindwa kuelewa.?
Tunabaki tu hatuelewi elewi, kama hao wanyama wengine.
Vifaa ambavyo ili uvitengeneze na kuvitumia unapaswa kwanza kuua uwezo wako wa Asili kuditect hayo na kuua hata afya yako ya mwili pia.Tena wengi Wanauwezo wa kuhisi hatari kuliko hata binaadamu
Binaadamu ni mpaka atumie vifaa like camera , Radar etc
But Kuna wanyama before ya storm kuja wanahisi hiyo hali ghafla wanachama kwenye hayo mazingira au wana Anza kupiga makelele mfarasi ni mmoja wapo
Hujawahi kufuga wanyama kama mbuzi wawe wote madume?Ni kweli kabisa wanyama wanaakili kuliko binadamu. Assume binadamu wa Tanzania akiona Diamond anavaa bwanga naye hufanya hivyo hivyo, hata ikitokea diamond akisema ushoga si kitu kibaya binadamu wengi sana Tanzania watakuwa mashoga.
Kwa wanyama akili kama hizi za kupumbavu huwezi kuzikuta.
Wanapandana tu, lakini dushelele zao hawazipenyezi katika puru.Hujawahi kufuga wanyama kama mbuzi wawe wote madume?
Huwa wanapandana.. survival for the fittest. Wale wadhaifu hupandwa sana
Unazungumza kama Mwafrica au mtu wa Ulimwengu wa tatu aliyejikatia tamaa ya maisha ambaye story kubwa kwake zinazomzunguka ni za Dotto Magari, Mwijaku, matajiri wa Katoro, uchawa, Lissu Mahakamani, miondombinu mibovu n.k Raia wa USA, Ulaya, Canada, Japan, Singapore, China, Taiwan au Australia ambao wana story za vumbuzi za teknolojia, movies, space, top music books, archeology, games n.k wana mawazo tofauti kabisa na haya yako.Sawasawa.
Lakini sisi binadamu hichi tunacho kiita akili kinatusaidia kweli?
Maana sisi pia tuna hangaika kuishi hapa duniani kwa mahangaiko na mateso licha ya kwamba tunadai tuna akili.
Sasa kama na sisi tuna teseka, hii akili tunayodai kwamba tunayo mbona imeshindwa kutuondolea mateso na shida ya hii dunia?
Inapenya kabisa.. mara kibao nilikuwa nikikuta sperms zinatoka kunako jagina kabisaWanapandana tu, lakini dushelele zao hawazipenyezi katika puru.
Tofauti na binadamu ambapo mdinya bila kujali hili wala lile huzamisha dushelele lake kunako puru la mwanaume mwingine almanusura makende nayo yaingie.
Mkuu we mbuzi umewachunga lini?Inapenya kabisa.. mara kibao nilikuwa nikikuta sperms zinatoka kunako jagina kabisa
Ukilinganisha na mnyama, Binadamu haangaiki kuishi duniani, anaishi.Sawasawa.
Lakini sisi binadamu hichi tunacho kiita akili kinatusaidia kweli?
Maana sisi pia tuna hangaika kuishi hapa duniani kwa mahangaiko na mateso licha ya kwamba tunadai tuna akili.
Sasa kama na sisi tuna teseka, hii akili tunayodai kwamba tunayo mbona imeshindwa kutuondolea mateso na shida ya hii dunia?