descarte
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 1, 2013
- 1,213
- 296
Tanzania is a secular state according to its constitution. This means that it does not have a state religion though most of its citizens do believe in some religions or any supernatural power. The acknowledgement of that fact by the constitution has implications in a Tanzanian democracy.
It implies that in Tanzania, the issues of religion are not the concern of public but rather private life. I agree that the government has no right to coerce people on issues of religion. It should let its citizens exercise their religious freedom.
In doing so the government will treat its citizens as mature moral beings. This maxim invokes the principles of equality and liberty which are essential in a democratic country.
However, the reality in Tanzania is quite distinct from understanding of this issue. In Tanzania at any government ceremony, most religious leaders from the main two religions(Islam and Christianity) are invited to pray a prayer in public.
This practice has been there for a long time and yet the government in doing so does not treat its people as equally important because it tries to show a certain religious life in public that is superior to others. For example, on such occasions, the government should know that in Tanzania the majority of people are Christians and Muslims but not all.
In Tanzania there are Hindus, traditional religion believers who are not recognized much by the government and atheists. In whatever the government does, it tries to show to the rest of the minority groups like Atheists, Hindus and traditional believers that the life of Christians or Muslims is superior to theirs in Tanzania.
It is time the government of Tanzania makes sure that it is neutral in religion. In this way, it is important to construe equality in different angles so that it makes the present democracy work well.
THE DISCUSSION IS OPEN!!I
It implies that in Tanzania, the issues of religion are not the concern of public but rather private life. I agree that the government has no right to coerce people on issues of religion. It should let its citizens exercise their religious freedom.
In doing so the government will treat its citizens as mature moral beings. This maxim invokes the principles of equality and liberty which are essential in a democratic country.
However, the reality in Tanzania is quite distinct from understanding of this issue. In Tanzania at any government ceremony, most religious leaders from the main two religions(Islam and Christianity) are invited to pray a prayer in public.
This practice has been there for a long time and yet the government in doing so does not treat its people as equally important because it tries to show a certain religious life in public that is superior to others. For example, on such occasions, the government should know that in Tanzania the majority of people are Christians and Muslims but not all.
In Tanzania there are Hindus, traditional religion believers who are not recognized much by the government and atheists. In whatever the government does, it tries to show to the rest of the minority groups like Atheists, Hindus and traditional believers that the life of Christians or Muslims is superior to theirs in Tanzania.
It is time the government of Tanzania makes sure that it is neutral in religion. In this way, it is important to construe equality in different angles so that it makes the present democracy work well.
THE DISCUSSION IS OPEN!!I