Atheism-Vs-Theism-Debate

[Mohamedy cadinaly]

There is this argument referred to as argument from locality firstly presented by Adam lee,author of Daylight atheism

The key question of this argument is,

Why does every religion currently being practiced as well as fairly past religion which no longer has a followers had definite origin in both space and time?

Christianity for instance,was founded by Jewish rabbi,Jesus almost 20 centuries ago in middle east

And that christian faith makes ludicrous claim that no man can go to heaven without redemptive power or name of Jesus

If that is the case then,what is fate of those people who existed and died before Jesus or christianity without even heard of christ and miracles he made?

Did they all go to hell?

Is that fair?

Why should an omnibenevolent God destine a specific ethnicity and dispense his revelation only to them

Instead of dispensing that revelation to all people from all cultures and all nations so as to ensure wide distributions of followers?

Is God racist?

 

[Tractus]

You and your arguments does not make any sense.

Of course, It my appear to you that way!! But, the bottomline is, which argument can you offer to refute the existence of God? You have no ground whatsoever to justify the non existence of God .

 

[muxar]

Uje kuniangalia

Nije kukuangalia wapi sasa,utakuwa wapi ukifa?

 

[Magobe T]

For centenaries,inquiries concern Godhead existence have been debated by philosophers,theologians,and even scientists

In debate between atheists and theists,accusation of bias,

Contemptuousness and bloody mindedness often oscillate between two camps

Atheists view arguments for existence of God as exceedingly feeble,self evidently flawed and unsatisfactory

Whereas theists consider atheists as sinners,despite the fact that unpondered life isn't worth

So this thread is destined to examine and analyze both philosophical and scientific arguments for and against God existence

Each camp
[theists and atheists]
is required to convince the readers that,
Their worldview is more analytically defensible than that of their opponents

Rule

1.Proofs that emerge from researches must be sourced,otherwise we'll presume them to be false

Definition

Atheism is simply disbelief in otherworldly realm,the contra of it is theism

Four great discoveries of modern science that prove God exists:

 

[devor]

Pale juu ni options niupande gani nataka?

 

[schlumberger]

Yaani bure kabisa,unataka tukupinge au kukuunga mkono kwa tafiti zilizofanyika au?? Mambo ya sayansi (tafiti) na Mambo tofauti,Mungu hatafitiki na hata hao wanasayansi wenu hawawezi kutafiri beyond sayansi,sayansi inapoishia ndipo Mungu anapoanzia ,I mean vitu tunavyoshindwa kuvitafiti kwa akili zetu na kuvielezea ndo Mungu mwenyewe,CHA MSINGI TUSISUMBUANE,AMINI UNACHOAMINI NA KILA MTU ASHIKE LAKE

"sayansi inapoishia ndipo Mungu anapoanzia".

hiyo Kauli ni ya uongo. The opposite is true. Mungu anapoishia ndipo sayansi inaanzia,

Proof:
"Enyi makundi ya majini na watu (wanadamu)! Mkiweza kupenya kwenye mbingu na Ardhi, basi penyeni! Hamtapenya (hamtaweza) Ila kwa idhini yangu (kwa kupewa madaraka). Ar-Rahman (55:33).

 

[Tz mbongo]

Hivi kwanini wanaosema hakuna Mungu huishia kuitwa wapinga Mungu na isiwe wanaosema kuna Mungu kuitwa wazusha Mungu?