Chanzo cha viumbe vyote(Kisayansi)

Chanzo cha viumbe vyote(Kisayansi)

You are a BELIEVER of NO GOD, unless you tell me you are sure He is not there, which I KNOW YOU CAN NOT PROVE TO ME THAT HE IS NOT THERE.

You as a believer of NO GOD, should be able to support what you BELIEVE. Unless you are just a BLIND FOLLOWER of a cult which believes in no God. It is sad and shame.

Do you know the diffnt btn NOTHING and SOMETHING??, if i say there is nothing in a Pot and u say that there is something in a pot,who must show the other the evidences??,
I know that u cant prove to me the existence of your God out of FAITH and BELIEFS.
 
Do you know the diffnt btn NOTHING and SOMETHING??, if i say there is nothing in a Pot and u say that there is something in a pot,who must show the other the evidences??,
I know that u cant prove to me the existence of your God out of FAITH and BELIEFS.
Are you trying to run away?

Believer of no God, can you support what you follow or you are part of a "BLIND FOLLOWER" diabolical Cult that believes in no God.

It seems you don't know what you BELIEVE. That is a problem to you. You can not support your notions of NO GOD. You can not support your BELIEF that He is not there. You are truly A BLIND FOLLOWER. It is sad and shame to be a blind follower of no God and you can not support what you follow and BELIEVE.

Are you sure for certain there is no God or you are just a believer that, there is no God? Which one are you?
 
Are you trying to run away?

Believer of no God, can you support what you follow or you are part of a "BLIND FOLLOWER" diabolical Cult that believes in no God.

It seems you don't know what you BELIEVE. That is a problem to you. You can not support your notions of NO GOD. You can not support your BELIEF that He is not there. You are truly A BLIND FOLLOWER. It is sad and shame to be a blind follower of no God and you can not support what you follow and BELIEVE.

Are you sure for certain there is no God or you are just a believer that, there is no God? Which one are you?

Please i dont run from the point, but it seems that u dont want to prove the existence of your God. OK LET'S say that i have failed to prove the Non existence of God.Then let u explain to me about your God.
 
Please i dont run from the point, but it seems that u dont want to prove the existence of your God. OK LET'S say that i have failed to prove the Non existence of God.Then let u explain to me about your God.

Why can't you support your FAITH of BELIEVING there is no God? Can you?

I ASKED YOU MORE THAN TEN TIMES:

WHICH one are YOU:

1. Do you BELIEVE there is no God?
2. Are you for certain there is no God?
3. Can you support your BELIEF that there is no God?
4. Are you a BLIND FOLLOWER of a cult that believe in no God?

Which one are you?
 
why can't you support your faith of believing there is no god? Can you?

I asked you more than ten times:

Which one are you:

1. Do you believe there is no god?
2. Are you for certain there is no god?
3. Can you support your belief that there is no god?
4. Are you a blind follower of a cult that believe in no god?

Which one are you?

i dont and i will not believe in the existence of god.
 
i dont and i will not believe in the existence of god.
Believer of No God:

If you claim God almost certainly does not exist, then you now carry part of the burden of proof to support your belief why He is not existing. You have to provide good reasons and evidence for the "almost certainly not" claim.

Furthermore, you have to tell us why you came to the conclusion that "you will not believe in the existence of God". It is your burden and you are bound to support your answer with airtight exhibits.

I will not tolerate assumptions and are not allowed in your reply. Only empirical and impeccable watertight verifiable evidences.

NOW SUPPORT YOUR BELIEF OF NO GOD.
 
Believer of No God:

If you claim God almost certainly does not exist, then you now carry part of the burden of proof to support your belief why He is not existing. You have to provide good reasons and evidence for the "almost certainly not" claim.

Furthermore, you have to tell us why you came to the conclusion that "you will not believe in the existence of God". It is your burden and you are bound to support your answer with airtight exhibits.

I will not tolerate assumptions and are not allowed in your reply. Only empirical and impeccable watertight verifiable evidences.

NOW SUPPORT YOUR BELIEF OF NO GOD.

utasubiri sanaaa... wao wamekariri wewe unataka wakupe USHAHIDI, wautoe wapi ?
 
SIJashindwa kuekeza kwa nn nasama HAKUNA MUNGU,tatizo hatujaelewana pande zote mbili.sWezi kuanzia hewan bila kujua hata nnayemuekezea hata kama anakijua nnachomwambia
 
Hii mada naona kama vile siielewi ni hoja au ni swali?
Samahan lakini mleta mada labda kama unaweza kutupa mwongozo au kurearrange mada yako.
Thanks
 
utasubiri sanaaa... wao wamekariri wewe unataka wakupe USHAHIDI, wautoe wapi ?
Asante Mkuu kwa kunifahamisha. Kumbe wao basi ni BELIEVERS OF NO GOD. Hakika wamepotea na nyoyo zao zimejaa chuki kwa Mungu.
 
SIJashindwa kuekeza kwa nn nasama HAKUNA MUNGU,tatizo hatujaelewana pande zote mbili.sWezi kuanzia hewan bila kujua hata nnayemuekezea hata kama anakijua nnachomwambia

Believer of NO GOD.

YOU HAVE FAILED TO TELL ME why YOU DO BELIEVE IN NO GOD.
 
MTAZAMO WANGU Kutokana na tafiti ndogo nilizo ninadhani mwanzo kabisa kabla ya kuwepo chochote kulikuwa hakuna kitu yaani utupu.

Katika huu utupu kulikuwa na Nguvu au nishati isiyo umbwa ya NISHATI YA BARIDI na umeme na nyinginezo

Kwa hiyo hizi nishati zisizo umbwasiku hadi siku zilikuwa katika hali ya mabadiliko jambo liliko sababisha kuongeza ku umbika kwa nishati au vitu vingine vinavyo umbika vyenyewe kulikuwa na vitu ambavyo vilikuwa vinaumbika AUTOMATIC.

.Na hisi kabisa mwanzo kabisa kulikuwa na utupu katika huo utupu kulikuwa na nishati mbalimbali zilizo kuwepo. Muunganiko wa hizo nishati ulisababisha utokeaji wa viumbe mbalimbali
Mimi mwanzoni kabisa ya ulimwengu kulikuwa kuna utupu. Baada ya utupu kukaa kwa muda mrefu combination au reaction ya hizi nishati ambazo ni lazima tu ziwepo (mfano JOTO au BARIDI ni hali ambazo ni lazima tu ziwepo} ziilikuwa ziki sababisha utokeaje wa nishati nyingine na vitu vingine.Hizi NGUVU ZISIZO ONEKANA ambazo ni lazima tu ziwepo ndo zilisababisha viumbe.

unapiga porojo tu sijui umekunywa viroba....... Mtu alitokana na upepo na umeme maana hueleweki..... Misele mingi tu
 
mi nilijua kuna nondo za maana zinamwagwa,mnabishana Mungu yupo au hayupo!
 
Mtume Mohammed kuwa na maarifa sio jambo la ajabu sana kwa maana inawezekana pia!!,binafsi naamini mtazamo wa uumbaji katika koran ni wa kisayansi na kiimani,kwa hiyo sio jambo la kushangaza sana.
Hoja ya big bang inaelezeka na kuprovika lakini koran inakuaminisha na haikupi. NAfAsi ya kuhoji

Kama unaamini uumbaji katika Quran ni wa kisayansi na kiimani, je! Sayansi hiyo katika Quran ililetwa na nani ama imetoka kwa nani?
 
Kama unaamini uumbaji katika Quran ni wa kisayansi na kiimani, je! Sayansi hiyo katika Quran ililetwa na nani ama imetoka kwa nani?[
Imetoka kwa waliokiandika kitabu cha Koran!.Ama wataka sema kimetoka kwa MUNGU wako??.nadhan umeridhika na jibu.
 
Kama unaamini uumbaji katika Quran ni wa kisayansi na kiimani, je! Sayansi hiyo katika Quran ililetwa na nani ama imetoka kwa nani?[
Imetoka kwa waliokiandika kitabu cha Koran!.Ama wataka sema kimetoka kwa MUNGU wako??.nadhan umeridhika na jibu.
Kuandika si tatizo .....maneno yaliyoandikwa hayakutoka kwa waandikaji.Hilo ndilo jambo la kuzingatia.
 
Back
Top Bottom