Hali tete as ICC tightens Uhuru, Ruto murder charges.

Hali tete as ICC tightens Uhuru, Ruto murder charges.

Ab-Titchaz

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Posts
14,630
Reaction score
4,253
ICC tightens Uhuru, Ruto murder charges

uhuru-kosgei1.jpg


By Evelyn Kwamboka



KENYA: The ICC Prosecutor now says she has additional incriminating evidence sufficient to sustain murder charges against Mr Uhuru Kenyatta, Mr William Ruto and two other Kenyan suspects.


The enhanced murder charges were contained in updated documents of charges prepared by Gambia-born Fatou Bensouda on the serious crimes against humanity facing the four Kenyans.

The new document reasserts alleged meetings held at State House, Nairobi, with Uhuru playing the central role in planning the revenge attacks witnessed in Naivasha.

As for Ruto who the prosecutor saddles with the Kiambaa church killings in Eldoret, the Prosecutor introduces a new list of alleged accomplices he was supposed to have worked with in mobilising, coordinating and commanding the killings in the Rift Valley.

Key among the names is that of Industrialisation minister and Tinderet MP Henry Kosgey, who initially the prosecution sought to have indicted alongside the four, before he was let off for lack of evidence that the judges felt would sustain trial.

Also listed as Ruto's accomplices, though not for purposes of being charged by to show the depth of alleged planning and execution of a ‘common plan' with military precision, are four senior former security officials from the Rift Valley.

They are two former military generals, John Koech and Augustine Cheruiyot, as well as former GSU and presidential service Commandant Samson Cherambos, who incidentally was one of the witnesses Ruto took to The Hague during pre-trial stage in a bid to clear his own name.

Also mentioned along this line is former international athlete killed in the clashes, Lucas Sang, as well as Mount Elgon MP Fred Kapondi.

Also listed as an accomplice is a renowned businessman and big-time farmer in Eldoret, Mr Jackson Kibor, a former ally of Ruto who was at first charged in a Kenyan court with the violence, but the charges were later dropped.

In her documents Bensouda outlined the kind of weaponry, strategies adopted to corner the targets of violence, the locations of attacks, and the manner in which the victims were executed as well as how the assaults were carried out and communication among perpetrators conveyed, to anchor the enhanced count she wants them charged with.
The evidence supporting murder charges during the 2007-2008 post-election violence, she made clear; also apply for the counts facing former Head of Civil Service Francis Muthaura, who is charged alongside Uhuru, and Kass FM's head of operations Mr Joshua Arap Sang, who shares his charges with Ruto.

It now means that Uhuru, who is the Jubilee alliance presidential candidate, and Ruto who is his running mate, will have to put up a bigger fight to extricate themselves from the cases that will start shortly after the March 4 elections, and on the day of a runoff if there will be one.

The additional evidence against Uhuru, who like the other three suspects, has denied he played a role in mobilising arming, coordinating and paying the two sets of attackers, is linked to six specific murders in which guns were used in Naivasha.

Ruto is also alleged to have been behind the murder at Nandi Hills where three people were killed as a result of petrol bombs. The attackers in Nandi Hills also allegedly used bows and arrows during the election violence according to the new evidence.

Bensouda says the additional evidence will convince the Pre-Trial Chamber to confirm the murder charges touching on those two areas.

"The prosecution respectfully informs the Chamber that since the confirmation hearing, the prosecution has obtained additional evidence to substantiate this factual allegation," she said in her submissions.


Accordingly, the prosecution intends to apply to the Pre-Trial Chamber to include the allegation touching on the murders to the court.The new evidence on the Naivasha killings shows that victims were shot and their bodies mutilated to conceal gunshot wounds.

If the Pre-Trial Chamber judges confirm the alleged claims, the prosecution will have no option but to seek the Trial Chamber's permission to re-insert that charge.


Bensouda said the application was aimed at properly putting the defence team on notice. The prosecutor said that in the event she does not seek confirmation of the additional evidence, the prosecution might seek to lead the evidence during trial.

The latest twist comes following the Trial Chamber's decision to order the prosecution to remove the claims on six victims who were allegedly killed by gunshot wounds from the murder charge against Uhuru and Muthaura.

The evidence was also expunged over the three murders allegedly committed through Ruto and Sang's support in Nandi Hills town-ship.

Bensouda argues that Uhuru and Muthaura committed murder and forcibly transferred the population by allegedly adopting the common plan to commit widespread and systematic attacks in retaliation against perceived Orange Democratic Movement supporters in Naivasha and Nakuru.
They are also alleged to have established links with the outlawed Mungiki sect and secured support and services for President Kibaki's Party of National Unity and making use of existing outlawed Mungiki sect structures by establishing a localised level of subordinates among PNU politicians.


The document filed at the ICC court on January 5 further indicates that this allowed them maximum control over the attacks.

"Kenyatta and Muthaura participated in multiple meetings at State House in Nairobi on December 30, 2007 and about January 3, 2008 at the Nairobi Club," says the updated document.

The meetings were allegedly held to activate the Mungiki and pro-PNU youths by placing the organisation under their central authority and to implement a common plan.

Uhuru and Muthaura allegedly committed the crimes against humanity by soliciting the support and contribution of local politicians and businessmen, providing funds and weapons to direct perpetrators.

Lawyers defending Muthaura countered allegations that he instructed the police not to interfere with attacks in Rift valley.

The prosecution claims Mungiki and PNU youth were deployed in various parts of Nakuru where targeted communities were attacked using petrol bombs, knives, machetes and guns.

The prosecution claims in the document that the attackers shot their victims between January 24 and 27, 2008 and mutilated their bodies to conceal gunshot wounds in areas such as Kaptembwa, Sewege, Ponda Mali, Barut and Kapkures.

"From on or about January 27 to 28, 2008, Muthaura and Kenyatta committed, jointly with each other and through members of the Mungiki group and pro-PNU youth, crime against humanity of the murder of civilians perceived to be supporters of ODM," Bensouda stated.

Within that period, the prosecution said at least 23 victims were killed, including 13 children, in Naivasha.

It was in Nakuru that Mungiki and pro-PNU youth went from house to house rounding up and forcibly circumcising men from one community using pangas and broken bottles.

"Six people were treated at the Provincial General Hospital of Nakuru for traumatic circumcision," charges Bensouda.

According to the prosecution, Rift Valley suffered the biggest brunt of the violence with 700 deaths and 400,000 forcible transfers of the population recorded.

Ruto and Sang's defence counsel are to grapple with claims that between 2006 to January 2008, their clients, along with others, planned to forcibly evict from the province members of three communities that were perceived to be PNU supporters.

This they were to allegedly do in a bid to have the region vote as a bloc in future general elections.

"Ruto and Sang knew that their conduct was part of, or intended for their conduct to be part of, a widespread or systematic attack," she charges.

"Perpetrators armed with arrows and machetes attacked Langas on January 1, 2008," she stated.

Standard Digital News - Kenya : ICC tightens Uhuru, Ruto murder charges
 
BENSOUDA TO REVEAL NAMES ON WEDNESDAY

Tuesday, January 8, 2013 - 00:00 -- BY OLIVER MATHENGE AND NZAU MUSAU

bensouda_0.png


ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda will tomorrow release her list of witnesses against four Kenyan suspects.

Meanwhile the trial judges have allowed Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to meet her witnesses before they present their evidence.

Lawyers for Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta, former Cabinet Secretary Francis Muthaura, Eldoret North MP William Ruto and former broadcaster Joshua arap Sang wanted her not to meet the witnesses beforehand because they claimed it would be tantamount to "coaching".

The four Kenyans will find out tomorrow the full scope of evidence and witnesses that Bensouda will use in their trials which start on April 10 and 11. On Wednesday Bensouda is due to file a pre-trial brief, a list of witnesses and a confirmation that she has disclosed all incriminating evidence to the accused.

The four are charged with crimes against humanity arising out of the violence following the disputed presidential election on December 27, 2007.

Officially, meeting witnesses before trial is known as "witness preparation". However it is also known as "witness proofing", "witness familiarization" and "witness coaching."

Bensouda wants to meet her witnesses 24 hours before they take the stand but the defence lawyers argued that this was unfair. "After thorough consideration of the various advantages and drawbacks of the practice, the chamber concludes that it is neither practical nor reasonable to prohibit pre-testimony meetings between parties and the witnesses they would call to testify at trial," the three trial judges said.

Judge Kuniko Ozaki (presiding), Christine Van den Wyngaert and Chile Eboe-Osuji were unanimous in their decision. Eboe-Osuji gave a "partly dissenting opinion" and wanted the witnesses to be allowed "practice" their testimonies as well but Ozaki and Wyngaert expressly ruled that out.

Eboe-Osuji argued that practicing testimony can be a "sensible and quite practical way" of imbuing the witness with confidence. He said it would improve the delivery of in-court testimonies.

"The same is the case with rehearsing or practicing for any other public presentation-including counsel's own opening and closing speeches," he said.

In their majority decision, the judges rejected submissions that the Victims and Witness Unit would be sufficient to prepare witnesses.

The lawyers for Uhuru, Ruto, Muthaura and Sang had argued that "coaching" would take away spontaneity from witnesses, modify their evidence and give the prosecution undue advantage. The judges said they were not convinced although they were mindful that witness preparation could become an improper rehearsal of in-court testimony.

"However, the Chamber is not convinced that this possibility necessitates a ban on pre-testimony meetings between parties and the witnesses they are calling, nor is it persuaded that an individual application should be required each time a party wishes to conduct a pre-testimony meeting with a witness," they said.

The judges said they have adopted guidelines to check against improper coaching of witnesses. They also said they expected that counsels will act professionally and in good faith.

In addition, the judges said the "coaching" sessions will be video recorded. If there are allegations of improper coaching, the judges will review the videos.

Bensouda's pre-trial brief tomorrow is expected to explain the prosecution's case. On Friday, the Trial Chamber V judges allowed Bensouda to extend the number of pages in the pre-trial briefs from 20 to 75 pages.

The pre-trial brief will contain a summary of the relevant evidence for each count of each witness to be relied on at trial, all other evidence to be relied upon, and how it relates to the charge proffered.

On the witness list, Bensouda is expected to include a bullet-point summary of the main facts on which each witness is expected to testify. She will indicate the estimated length of time required for each witness and the total time for the presentation of the prosecution case.

"Prosecution disclosure to the defence of all incriminatory material in the form of witness statements and any other material to be relied on at trial, and provision of all material for inspection to the defence should be completed by 9 January 2013," the Trial Chamber V said in July last year when setting the timetable leading to trial.

By Wednesday last week, Bensouda had disclosed 34 incriminating items to Uhuru and Muthaura. Bensouda has disclosed 35 items to Ruto and Sang.

She will disclose to the defence the identities of her witnesses under ICC protection on February 11. She will disclose to the defence the identities of those not under ICC protection on March 13.

Two weeks ago, Bensouda asked the court to allow her to delay disclosure of the identities of seven witnesses in the case against Ruto and Sang' beyond the Wednesday deadline. The judges were yet to rule on the matter yesterday.

Bensouda also wants to be allowed to provide summaries or to withhold disclosure when redactions are insufficient to conceal the identities of some witnesses.

For two witnesses, the prosecutor wants to only disclose their identities 30 days before the trial against Ruto and Sang' starts on April 10. She asked the trial judges to let her to disclose the identities of the other five witnesses 45 days before the trials start.

BENSOUDA TO REVEAL NAMES ON WEDNESDAY | The Star
 
Eeh mkuu hali ni tete kweli kweli, but I stress the point that the elections and the environment that engulfs the electioneering period towars march 2013 is one of sobriety even though pandemonium and recoils of the ICC campaigns are at full gear. Though one distinctive observation strikes us that the scripts of those that engineered the ICC pandemonium are not in tandem with the efforts of the chief prosecutor of the ICC. The in-tonations of the ICC engineers are visibly subsiding to a lesser magnitde where they are now opting to identify themselves and claim credit for the current judicial reforms.

My question is where does besnouda collect her evidence, are they extracting evidence from witnesses or are they trying to conduct their trial around manufuctured evidence? Though the ICC is an independent body, the means of how they collect evidence is shrouded under a cloud of mystery.
 
Na aliye moblize Kisumu na Kibera ni nani? na wale waliong'oa reli za kuelekea uganda mpaka mzee 7 akatukana ni nani aliwa-moblize. Waafrika bwana, sasa wamechakachuliwa kwa kuletewa muafrika ili isionekane ni mwendolezo wa ukoloni. Hatavyivyo, it can fool no-one.
 
Hata Ma-CCM yaliyotoa amri ya kuuwa Raia kisa ni Wana-CHADEMA inabidi nayenyewe siku moja yakahukumiwe huko.

Ila yasiwe na wasiwasi maana yatakuwa UHOLANZI.
 
Eeh mkuu hali ni tete kweli kweli, but I stress the point that the elections and the environment that engulfs the electioneering period towars march 2013 is one of sobriety even though pandemonium and recoils of the ICC campaigns are at full gear. Though one distinctive observation strikes us that the scripts of those that engineered the ICC pandemonium are not in tandem with the efforts of the chief prosecutor of the ICC. The in-tonations of the ICC engineers are visibly subsiding to a lesser magnitde where they are now opting to identify themselves and claim credit for the current judicial reforms.

My question is where does besnouda collect her evidence, are they extracting evidence from witnesses or are they trying to conduct their trial around manufuctured evidence? Though the ICC is an independent body, the means of how they collect evidence is shrouded under a cloud of mystery.

Wewe morio, the evidence at the ICC is overwhelmingly coming from the NSIS...especially the sh!t that will
rope Ruto in....courtesy of the Waki report that was given to Annan and found its way to the OTP.
Acha kujifanya hujui hio kitu!

Then the other day Bensouda came to Kenya herself to go see the Kiambaa church and talk to the victims.
What is shrouded in mystery there?

That Kiambaa thing was pure murder and everybody was shocked at the level of evil exhibited by the
murderers who burnt people in a church!!!!...Ruto hawezi kuepuka "command and control" of the fellows
who carried out the attack. That's why the murder charges were upgraded and tightened.

As for your blue eyed boy, Uhuru Kenyatta those meetings at Statehouse and his dalliance with Mungiki
will nail him. I'm so glad that Maina Njenga is alive and 'untouchable'....coz that morio can spill all the beans
that link Jomo's son to the Mungiki hands down. Now you know why he is walking around free yet he commited
unspeakable evil to his fellow kindred and beyond.

I will not let you get away with falsehoods on this forum maana 'ukimwaga mboga mimi nawaga ugali'...:smile:
 
Mzima sana
naona Raila fans hii habari wataruka ruka mno lol....

Hii kwangu mimi sio cha Raila wala nini....mimi nimechoka na hawa mabwana wanaojifanya hawatii sheria
maana hao ni watoto wa wakubwa au matajiri wakuoza mpaka wana-control mahakama za nchi.

Hii kitu wamejitakia wenyewe...Uhuru na Ruto walikua wanapigania kesi zifanywe ICC wakijua kwamba jina la
Raila limo ndani ya bahasha. Siku ile bahasha ilipofunguliwa na wakakuta Raila hayumo bali ni wao
wawili basi wakageuza kibao na kupiga 'abou-turn' ya 360 degrees.

Leo imekula kwao maana kesi za ICC zikianza nd'o zimeanza hamna ku-stop. Hebu wakamuuliza
Al-Bashir wa Sudan!
 
Hata Ma-CCM yaliyotoa amri ya kuuwa Raia kisa ni Wana-CHADEMA inabidi nayenyewe siku moja yakahukumiwe huko.

Ila yasiwe na wasiwasi maana yatakuwa UHOLANZI.

Mkuu,

ikitokea Bongo amini usiamini watapigania kesi zifanywe Arusha ile waeze ku-control mambo.
Hawa kina Uhuru kwa sasa nicho wanachopigania lakini too late. Soma hapa:


Uhuru and Muthaura in push for local trial


ICC+px.jpg


PHOTO | FILE Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta (L) and former head of Public Service Francis Muthaura leaving the ICC building. NATION MEDIA GROUP

By DAVE OPIYO dopiyo@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Wednesday, January 9 2013 at 00:30


In Summary


  • DPM and former civil service boss want cases heard in Kenya and Tanzania

Two of the four Kenyans facing crimes against humanity charges at the International Criminal Court are still pushing for their cases to be tried locally.

Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta and former head of Public Service Francis Muthaura have requested the ICC presidency to change where the court shall sit for the trial of their cases to either Kenya or Tanzania.


However in a ruling on an application by Mr Muthaura, Judge Cuno Tarfusser, ICC's Second Vice-President requests the chamber "to seek the views of the parties on the application, before deciding whether to recommend the Presidency to consult the relevant national authorities."

Mr Muthaura had applied for a change of place where the court could hold its trials other than The Hague.

The move comes as ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda is on Wednesday expected to release her list of witnesses to testify against the four Kenyan suspects.

Apart from Mr Kenyatta and Muthaura, others facing charges at The Hague-based court include Eldoret North MP William Ruto and radio presenter Joshua arap Sang.

They are charged with crimes against humanity arising from the hotly disputed 2007 presidential elections, where more than 1,000 people lost their lives and at least 350,000 were rendered homeless.

Bringing the cases against the four back to Kenya has become a campaign issue, with a number of presidential candidates pledging to do so once elected.

Witnesses meet

Meanwhile, the trial judges - Kuniko Ozaki (Presiding Judge), Christine Van den Wyngaert and Chile Eboe-Osuji - have given Ms Bensouda the go ahead to meet her witnesses before they are called to testify.

"After thorough consideration of the various advantages and drawbacks of the practice, the Chamber concludes that it is neither practical nor reasonable to prohibit pre-testimony meetings between parties and the witnesses they will call to testify at trial," they said.

Lawyers of the accused had claimed that the prosecutor would coach witnesses if allowed to meet them before the trial.

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/politi...-trial/-/1064/1660992/-/107kf3ez/-/index.html
 
Mbona hakuna jipya. Waliouwa wanajulikana tangu zamani tatizo ni kulindana .. ... ... wacha waendelee kulindana si uchaguzi unakuja.
 
Hii kwangu mimi sio cha Raila wala nini....mimi nimechoka na hawa mabwana wanaojifanya hawatii sheria
maana hao ni watoto wa wakubwa au matajiri wakuoza mpaka wana-control mahakama za nchi.

Hii kitu wamjitakia wenyewe...Uhuru na Ruto walikua wanapigania kesi zifanywe ICC wakijua kwamba jina la
Raila limo ndani ya bahasha. Siku ile bahasha ilipofunguliwa na wakakuta Raila hayumo bali ni wao
wawili basi wakageuza kibao na kupiga 'abou-turn' ya 360 degrees.

Leo imekula kwao maana kesi za ICC zikianza nd'o zimeanza hamna ku-stop. Hebu wakamuuliza
Al-Bashir wa Sudan!

Wanasiasa bwana wanachekesha sana. Wakati ule Martha Karua akiwa Waziri wa Sheria alipeleka mswaada bungeni wa kuunda Special Court, lakini wakamzomea. Kila mwanasiasa akisimama alikuwa akisema mambo yote Hague. Sasa hivi wanalalamika. Nadhani ni Mungu tu anayeweza kuwaelewa wanasiasa
 
Mkuu Ab-Titchaz,

Sijui ni haraka au vipi ila naona nikusahihishe kidogo kuwa ukigeuka nyuzi 360, unakuwa palepale au direction ile ile ulikuwa ukienda. Hapa nina imani ulikuwa ukitaka kusema waligeuka nyuzi 180.......

Asante sana kwa jumbe zako ambazo zinafungua zaidi kinachoendelea kwa watani na ndugu zetu wa Kenya ambao bila wao, hatuwezi kuishi na bila sisi hawawezi kuishi. Maisha yatakuwa Bored sana 🙂

180_Degree_Rotation.png


Hii kitu wamjitakia wenyewe...Uhuru na Ruto walikua wanapigania kesi zifanywe ICC wakijua kwamba jina la
Raila limo ndani ya bahasha. Siku ile bahasha ilipofunguliwa na wakakuta Raila hayumo bali ni wao
wawili basi wakageuza kibao na kupiga 'abou-turn' ya 360 degrees.
 
Kibaki na Raila wanagombania ushindi lakini watuhumiwa ni Ruto na Uhuru! Ridiculous...
 
Mkuu Ab-Titchaz,

Sijui ni haraka au vipi ila naona nikusahihishe kidogo kuwa ukigeuka nyuzi 360, unakuwa palepale au direction ile ile ulikuwa ukienda. Hapa nina imani ulikuwa ukitaka kusema waligeuka nyuzi 180.......

Asante sana kwa jumbe zako ambazo zinafungua zaidi kinachoendelea kwa watani na ndugu zetu wa Kenya ambao bila wao, hatuwezi kuishi na bila sisi hawawezi kuishi. Maisha yatakuwa Bored sana 🙂

180_Degree_Rotation.png

Hehehehe...haya mkuu mwenzangu unajua wengine wetu wakati wa somo la hisabati tulikua tunakwenda
kunywa mbege aisee!...:glasses-nerdy:

Umeniwahi hapo lakini nadhani ujumbe ulifika sio?

Swadaktaa.
 
Back
Top Bottom