Eng. Smasher
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 13, 2010
- 745
- 23
Teh teh Smasher umenichekesha kweli kweli, ila kamanda hiyo sio theorem labda uiite Conjecture kwani haina any analytical base kuitwa proof. Halafu kwenye step 5, why did you neglect negative solution?
My take: The whole thing does not bring any sense
@Smasher.....if we were as you say - equal to problems, then you wouldnt have loved us soo much.........
woman = √ (problems) 2
woman= problems
proved: Any comments pls,ni mtizamo 2!!!!!
Dats why 2na problems kibao,we have no other choice coz we have to face the problems!!!
Means Woman=Problems
Orait..... ila pamoja na hayo matatizo - arent we the source of your most successes.....?
Prove coz I don knw how nyie ni source of our most successes!
For what i think iz ur supporting us in most of our successes but not the source!!
source....support...whatever!
at the end of the day - there is our hand in it
mmh hii si kweli.
hesabu zingine bwana matatizo matupu!!!!!!! acha kuipotosha jamii tangu lini hesabu imejaa maneno tu mwanzo mwisho hata namba hakuna. mi sikubali kama women =problem bwana. kwanza ukisoma biblia mwanzo adam alikuwa mpweke mpaka Eva alipoumbwa. if so ADAM asingefurahia uumbaji wa Eva.
au wadau mnasemaje?
Mathematical wise,that might be the case...............In God's perspective women,i was created as a suitable helper of a man.Genesis 2:18,The Lord said,''It is not good for the man to be alone,I will make a helper suitable for him.'' I belive in God who created us women with this purpose,am not a problem,a man might be the source of his own problems!:eyeroll1: