Hukumu ya Sabaya na Wenzake


..sasa police na wenyewe wakati mwingine si waporaji.

..au majaji hawajui kwamba kuna baadhi ya Polisi wanashiriki uporaji?

..au hakuna uwezekano ktk uhalifu wao waporaji walikuwa na mashirikiano na Polisi?
 
Sema hivi. Mungu aliyemuumba Adam ndiye huyo huyo aliyemuumba tundulissu na Padri Slaa. Wa kwanza anadekeza ushoga mwingine anadekeza ufuska nje ya ndoa nje ya madhabahu. Then umalizie kuwa kunde ni Mungu wa CCM tinataka tunehuru, Munguhuru.
 
Siku tutakapokuwa na jeshi la kizalendo lenye kuweka mbele maslahi ya taifa kama yale majeshi ya nchi za Afrika Magharibi haya yote yataisha na ndio utakuwa mwisho wa ccm kuitawala nchi hii.
 
Siku tutakapokuwa na jeshi la kizalendo lenye kuweka mbele maslahi ya taifa kama yale majeshi ya nchi za Afrika Magharibi haya yote yataisha na ndio utakuwa mwisho wa ccm kuitawala nchi hii.
Fafanua. Jeshi la kizalendo ni lipi? Hujui yulishinda Vita ya Kagera kwa umoja wetu? Libya na Wapelestina PLO walileta askari kumsaidia Iddi Amin eti Mwislamu dhodi ya Mkristo Nyerere? Unalijua hilo? Akaja jenerali Muislamu Muhidini Kimario akatugomboa? Askari wa kwanza kufa vitani walikuwa KMKM kupiga mbizi Mto Kagera? Wewe unataka uzalendo zaidi ya huo? Ghadafi baadaye akagundua kuwa kumbe alidanganywa tukawa marafiki hadi kifo chake? Kuna uzalendo zaidi ya huo?
 
Hii sehemu yako ya hukumu naamini kabisa majaji wametumia fikra zao, wala hawajaongozwa na sheria yoyote kusema hivyo, so kwasababu hiyo, kwangu hiyo statement ya majaji haina mantiki, haina uhalisia wa mazingira yetu, na pia tabia za jeshi letu la polisi.

Kuna matukio mengi yanayothibitisha polisi wetu nao wana tabia za kijambazi, wapo watuhumiwa wengi wanaofia mikononi mwa polisi, kuporwa mali zao na polisi, na hata kutekwa, sasa kwa hiyo statement ya majaji unayoiamini wewe, kwangu ni nyepesi mno, haina uzito kabisa.

Sent from my SM-G900H using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Sema hivi. Mungu aliyemuumba Adam ndiye huyo huyo aliyemuumba tundulissu na Padri Slaa. Wa kwanza anadekeza ushoga mwingine anadekeza ufuska nje ya ndoa nje ya madhabahu. Then umalizie kuwa kunde ni Mungu wa CCM tinataka tunehuru, Munguhuru.
The discussion on the table is about, independence, impartiality, transparency, and professionalism
of our judiciary. From nowhere, you are introducing the question ushoga and ufska! Two quite unrelated issues! Halafu useme Tanzania tuna watu kweli! people who can see the reality of things from their right perspective!

A NOTE TO YOU: You can not say for sure that your beloved ones are not engaging themselves in those affairs you have mentioned, since those issues are done in very strict privacy!
 
Mmh
 
200% correct!
 
Kile kituko cha mbowe nacho sio aibu??

Mbowe alikutwa na kesi ya kujibu ila akaachiwa hivi hivi tu.

Nayo sio aibu kamanda??
Atakwambia ilikuwa ya kubumba! Achana na mpumbavu huyo
 
Endelea kulalama mpaka siku unakufa

Unakumbuka GAIDI MBOWE alipatikana na mashtaka ya kujibu,RAIS SAMIA akamsamehe?
 
Mkishakua wahujumu na fisadi mnapoteza akili au ni wajinga tu. Sasa hapo umeandika kitu gani mtoa post.
 
Shetani hawezi kumtoa shetani mwezie....
 

Sabaya na genge lake wachomoka kwa sababu za kiufundi upande wa mashtaka na polisi hawakuweza kuunda ushahidi wa ku-move bench la majaji kuwa ushahidi upo usiotia shaka kuwatia hatiani warufani

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
AT ARUSHA
fCORAM: MWAMBEGELE. J.A., KITUSI, J.A. And MGQNYA, J.AJ

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 231 OF 2022

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS...........................APPELLANT

VERSUS

LENGAI OLE SABAYA
SILVESTER WENCESLAUS NYEGU I .................................RESPONDENTS
DANIEL GABRIEL MBURA

(Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Tanzania, at Arusha)
(Kisanya, J.)
dated the 6th day of May, 2022

in Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2021
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
1st & 17th November, 2023
MWAMBEGELE, J.A,:

The three respondents, Lengai Ole Sabaya, Sylvester Wenceslaus
Nyegu and Daniel Gabriel Mbura, were arraigned in the Court of the Resident
Magistrate of Arusha for three counts of armed robbery contrary to section
287A of the Penal Code. After a full trial, the trial court (Amworo, SRM),
convicted them as charged in the second count. In the first and third counts, the learned trial Senior Resident Magistrate, was of the view that the offence of armed robbery had not been proved. In its stead, the learned trial Senior

Page 1

.....
Richard Estomihi Kimei and Another v. Republic (Criminal Appeal No.375 of 2016) [2018] TZCA 210 (11 October, 2018) TANZLII at pp. 6 and 8 where we held that the offence of gang rape cannot be a substitute of an alternative verdict to that of rape. She thus implored us to follow suit and hold that the offence of gang robbery cannot be a substitute for the offenceof armed robbery. She beseeched us to so hold and allow this ground of appeal.

With regard to the variance between the charge and evidence, the learned Senior State Attorney admitted that, indeed, the coins and EFD machine did not feature in the charge but featured prominently well in evidence, that they were among the items allegedly stolen by the respondents. The same was the case with a handkerchief and a wallet. The learned counsel submitted that the High Court Judge held that this variance was fatal. She argued that there was that minor variance but did not go to the root of the matter and did not occasion any injustice to the respondents and, therefore, the High Court should have found so. After all, she added, Bakari Rahibu Msangi (PW6) did not say a wallet was stolen from him. The High Court thus erred in stating that a wallet was one of the items stolen from PW6. She relied on our decision in Joshua Joseph @ Paulo v......

Page 3

.....whether the Tshs. 1,000,000/= referred to by Mohamed Saad Hajirin (PWl) was inclusive in the Tshs. 2,769,000/= mentioned in the charge sheet.

Another alleged contradiction referred to by the High Court is with regard to the identification parade which was supervised by Insp. Evance Francis Mwamengo (PW9) to the effect that PW6 identified Deogratias Peter and
Daniel Bura while the testimony of PW9 and Exh. P2 show that the suspect who was identified was Daniel Laurent Bura; Deogratias Peter is not mentioned. The learned Principal State Attorney clarified that the learned High Court Judge misapprehended the evidence in that he did not realize there were two identification parades conducted during which Deogratias Peter was identified in one and Daniel Laurent Bura was identified in another.

Another contradiction referred to by the High Court Judge, Ms.
Luwongo went on submitting, was in respect of the name of the third respondent; while the charge sheet refers to him as Daniel Gabriel Mbura,PW6 and Exh. P2 refer to him as Daniel Bura and Daniel Laurent Bura,
respectively. The learned Principal State Attorney submitted that there were
essentially no contradictions and the minute
discrepancy regarding the
name of the third respondent can be glossed over as minor and did not go.....

Page 9

READ MORE :
Read the full judgment sheet, a total of 34 pages

Source : Director of Public Prosecutions vs Lengai Ole Sabaya & Others (Criminal Appeal No. 231 of 2022) [2023] TZCA 17853 (17 November 2023)
 
Mheshimiwa Jaji ametumia ushahidi usiotia shaka kutoa hukumu ...

Vipi kuhusu wewe ndugu? una ushahidi wowote unaoweza kumtia hatiani ndugu Sabaya?

Najua wewe ni mwanasheria jibu bila hasira.
Mweupe upstairs huyu..
 
Mheshimiwa Jaji ametumia ushahidi usiotia shaka kutoa hukumu ...

Vipi kuhusu wewe ndugu? una ushahidi wowote unaoweza kumtia hatiani ndugu Sabaya?

Najua wewe ni mwanasheria jibu bila hasira.
Ebu tuonyeshe kuwa Mheshimwa Jaji katumia ushahidi usio shaka. Kwamba katoa hukumu tu hio sio ushahidi.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…