If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

[Free ideas]

Naona unaleta siasa ,dini ktk Sayansi

Utachukua muda sana kunielewa!

eti wanatafuta link kati ya binadamu na Sokwe KWA KUTUMIA MFUPA MMOJA...BILA KUTUAMBIA KM HAUKUWA WA MNYAMA KILEMA AU BINADMAU KILEMA.EVEOLUTION THEOREM ..Imajaa CHANCES tupu.Kila kitu kipo ktk probability ya 1/billionth kutokea.wakati ushahidi wao wenyewe wa maeneo mengine unawatuambia kuwa nature ina eveidence kubwa ya survival ktk wingi au probability kubwa.Yaani probability ya wewe kuzaliwa babako alipiga bao lenye mbengu millions, ili binadamu na wanyama wengine ni kuzaana sana, kukimbia hatari na kurithi kizazi kilichpita.ndio maana hawajatupa taarifa ya GOD PARTICLE ktk LAB YA ULAYA...

Ndugu inavoonesha hauijui Evolution.We ni moja ya wale wanaojua Evolution ni Manyani na masokwe kuwa binadamu.Jifunze ndugu.

 

[Nicholas]

Utachukua muda sana kunielewa! Ndugu inavoonesha hauijui Evolution.We ni moja ya wale wanaojua Evolution ni Manyani na masokwe kuwa binadamu.Jifunze ndugu.

Wewe ndio hujanielewa wala hujaelewa sana evolution..kwa taarifa yako nipo mbali sana.....NIKUSAIDIE TUU KUWA HAYO NDIO MAENEO PEKEE WAMEWEKEZA KUTAFUTIA USHAHIDI.Ktk life iliyoanzia ktk hydrogen na Nitrogen na sijui radi kupiga baharini walishashindwa hata kwa kupewa vifaa na mazingiza yaliyotengwa kisayansi wameshindwa,tengeneza hata backeria from hizo gase na maji...sijui ktk mazingira ya rough ya baharini, ingewezekanaje.Hivi nikikuuliza wewe samaki na chochote watahitaji kula nini na kufanya nini ili waa adapt nchi kavu ,ili wawe binadamu, wame simba, ili wawe chui , na watahitaji kufanya eveolution kwa speed gani ili chui wasiwe wanakula wanaobadilika taratibu huku wakiwa hawaja adapt kuliwa na na chui?au Porcupine watahitaji patikana wangapi iliwaliwe kiasi gani ,na hiyo baiologi yao ijue lini kuwa wanahitaji kuwa na miba ili kupunguza kasi ya kuliwa, na kwanii binadamu hakua adapt mtoto kuzaliwa na kukimbia km wa nyumbu ili kuongeza rate ya survival, akachagua akili ?

 

[Nicholas]

Evolution itakuwa na brain ,itakuwa intelliegence process..ili ktk bahati mbaya zake kila kitu kitokee kizuri.Hata binadamu mwenyewe si kila bahati mbaya inaishia kuwa ugunduzi..eti bingo nimegundua COFFEE..bingo nimekundua mayonaisse...Vingine vini tuu ni catastrophe.....na si bingo nimendua Athrax africa isiyojulikana na mzungu

 

[Nicholas]

Atheist ni wajinga kweli:Eti Badger anaamka asubuhi anajikuta kuwa chakula chake muhimu ni nyoka mwenye sumu kali ambayo huwezi ionja kwa dozi ndogo hadi ikuzoee, na ngozi yake ina mafuta mengie sana ya kuzuia sumu kuingia haraka.Na tumbo yake ina dilute sumu inayoweza kata kata misuli na proteine ya mwili ktk dkk chache.Muda wote wa kujifunza hiyo sumu maisha yanakwenda tuu na wanazaa kwa vizazi bila kula.

 

[Free ideas]

Atheist ni wajinga kweli:Eti Badger anaamka asubuhi anajikuta kuwa chakula chake muhimu ni nyoka mwenye sumu kali ambayo huwezi ionja kwa dozi ndogo hadi ikuzoee, na ngozi yake ina mafuta mengie sana ya kuzuia sumu kuingia haraka.Na tumbo yake ina dilute sumu inayoweza kata kata misuli na proteine ya mwili ktk dkk chache.Muda wote wa kujifunza hiyo sumu maisha yanakwenda tuu na wanazaa kwa vizazi bila kula.

Mengi uliyoandika hayaeleweki

 

[Free ideas]

Evolution itakuwa na brain ,itakuwa intelliegence process..ili ktk bahati mbaya zake kila kitu kitokee kizuri.Hata binadamu mwenyewe si kila bahati mbaya inaishia kuwa ugunduzi..eti bingo nimegundua COFFEE..bingo nimekundua mayonaisse...Vingine vini tuu ni catastrophe.....na si bingo nimendua Athrax africa isiyojulikana na mzungu

Evolution by natural selection

Evolution in the New Scientist.

The world is divided into things that look designed (like birds and airliners) and things that don't (rocks and mountains). Things that look designed are divided into those that really are designed (submarines and tin openers) and those that aren't (sharks and hedgehogs). The diagnostic of things that look (or are) designed is that their parts are assembled in ways that are statistically improbable in a functional direction. They do something well: for instance, fly.

Darwinian natural selection can produce an uncanny illusion of design. An engineer would be hard put to decide whether a bird or a plane was the more aerodynamically elegant.

So powerful is the illusion of design, it took humanity until the mid-19th century to realize that it is an illusion. In 1859, Charles Darwin announced one of the greatest ideas ever to occur to a human mind: cumulative evolution by natural selection. Living complexity is indeed orders of magnitude too improbable to have come about by chance. But only if we assume that all the luck has to come in one fell swoop. When cascades of small chance steps accumulate, you can reach prodigious heights of adaptive complexity. That cumulative build-up is evolution. Its guiding force is natural selection.

Every living creature has ancestors, but only a fraction have descendants. All inherit the genes of an unbroken sequence of successful ancestors, none of whom died young and none of whom failed to reproduce. Genes that program embryos to develop into adults who can successfully reproduce automatically survive in the gene pool, at the expense of genes that fail. This is natural selection at the gene level, and we notice its consequences at the organism level. There has to be an ultimate source of new genetic variation, and it is mutation. Copies of newly mutated genes are reshuffled through the gene pool by sexual reproduction, and selection removes them from the pool in a way that is non-random.

What makes for success in the business of life varies from species to species. Some swim, some walk, some fly, some climb, some root themselves into the soil and tilt green solar panels toward the sun. All this diversity stems from successive branchings, starting from a single bacterium-like ancestor, which lived between 3 and 4 billion years ago. Each branching event is called a speciation: a breeding population splits into two, and they go their separately evolving ways. Among sexually reproducing species, speciation is said to have occurred when the two gene pools have separated so far that they can no longer interbreed. Speciation begins by accident. When separation has reached the stage where there is no interbreeding even without a geographical barrier, we have the origin of a new species.

Natural selection is quintessentially non-random, yet it is lamentably often miscalled random. This one mistake underlies much of the skeptical backlash against evolution. Chance cannot explain life. Design is as bad an explanation as chance because it raises bigger questions than it answers. Evolution by natural selection is the only workable theory ever proposed that is capable of explaining life, and it does so brilliantly.

 

[badiebey]

we really cant change our destiny and God knows that already,I think we r just given a chance to vividly witness how our choices will finally end where we are meant to end..

 

[Nicholas]

we really cant change our destiny and God knows that already,I think we r just given a chance to vividly witness how our choices will finally end where we are meant to end..

Haha...Ndio maana Nampenda na Kumkubali Yesu Mnazareth.Change of destine haina tofauti na change of ways.Kila njia inakufikisha mwisho tofauti.Kuna Njia nyingine ni ndefu na zina junction ya kuingia ktk nyingine.Kujua kwa Mungu kuwa destine yako ni ipi hakumaanishi kukuzuia wewe usiwe easily influenced.

 

[Nicholas]

Evolution by natural selection Evolution in the New Scientist. The world is divided into things that look designed (like birds and airliners) and things that don't (rocks and mountains). Things that look designed are divided into those that really are designed (submarines and tin openers) and those that aren't (sharks and hedgehogs). The diagnostic of things that look (or are) designed is that their parts are assembled in ways that are statistically improbable in a functional direction. They do something well: for instance, fly. Darwinian natural selection can produce an uncanny illusion of design. An engineer would be hard put to decide whether a bird or a plane was the more aerodynamically elegant. So powerful is the illusion of design, it took humanity until the mid-19th century to realize that it is an illusion. In 1859, Charles Darwin announced one of the greatest ideas ever to occur to a human mind: cumulative evolution by natural selection. Living complexity is indeed orders of magnitude too improbable to have come about by chance. But only if we assume that all the luck has to come in one fell swoop. When cascades of small chance steps accumulate, you can reach prodigious heights of adaptive complexity. That cumulative build-up is evolution. Its guiding force is natural selection. Every living creature has ancestors, but only a fraction have descendants. All inherit the genes of an unbroken sequence of successful ancestors, none of whom died young and none of whom failed to reproduce. Genes that program embryos to develop into adults who can successfully reproduce automatically survive in the gene pool, at the expense of genes that fail. This is natural selection at the gene level, and we notice its consequences at the organism level. There has to be an ultimate source of new genetic variation, and it is mutation. Copies of newly mutated genes are reshuffled through the gene pool by sexual reproduction, and selection removes them from the pool in a way that is non-random. What makes for success in the business of life varies from species to species. Some swim, some walk, some fly, some climb, some root themselves into the soil and tilt green solar panels toward the sun. All this diversity stems from successive branchings, starting from a single bacterium-like ancestor, which lived between 3 and 4 billion years ago. Each branching event is called a speciation: a breeding population splits into two, and they go their separately evolving ways. Among sexually reproducing species, speciation is said to have occurred when the two gene pools have separated so far that they can no longer interbreed. Speciation begins by accident. When separation has reached the stage where there is no interbreeding even without a geographical barrier, we have the origin of a new species. Natural selection is quintessentially non-random, yet it is lamentably often miscalled random. This one mistake underlies much of the skeptical backlash against evolution. Chance cannot explain life. Design is as bad an explanation as chance because it raises bigger questions than it answers. Evolution by natural selection is the only workable theory ever proposed that is capable of explaining life, and it does so brilliantly.

Nilijua unaandika vya wengine ndio maana hujaweza andika yako kwa kifupi tuu.Ulichoandika ni ujinga mtupu ila mwisho ukamalizia kwa evolution.Mutation haijawahi leta kitu kipya kinachoweza zalisha kingine.Mutation inapunguza na kuondoa survival,na hiyo kuua kabisa nortion ya survival for the fitest.Mbaya zaidi survival prowess ya viumbe inapunguza siku zinavyokwenda na hivyo kuonyesha jinsi adaptability ilivyo ngumu.N ainapinga evelotion.Walio na sifa kamili za kurithi ndio wanaosurvive.Sasa hilo la natural selection linaturudisha palepale ktk NATURAL LAWS..naturala laws hazibadiliki, na zisipofuatwa waliopo ndani wanafutika.Na si kuwachagua wengine, wapo wanyama kibao wanakosa maji wanakufa tuu, wapo wanaoliwa na wnegine hadi wanakwisha.na hakuna chance ya kujibadili ili wapone.Labda ugonjwa uje na kuwaua maadui hadi wapungue na hivyo kasi ya kula izidiwe na ya kuzaana.Natural selection ndipo huko kunapomweka Mweka hizo sheria.Yaani Muumba ambaye ukipinda basi Matokeo yake yanakuhusu ,sasa inategemea matokeo nini?km ni ya kutosha kukufundisha na ukabaki na nafasi ya kujiekebisha poa otherwise its over.

 

[Nicholas]

Mengi uliyoandika hayaeleweki

Ungeelewa usingekuwa mswahili tena.....hizo ndizo sifa za mswahili na tofauti yake na wengine wanaomfanya ngazi kila mahali.Pamoja na majigambo yake kuwa mjuaji na kafika wa kwanza na yeye ndie mwneye mji.

 

[kaka km]

1.We are the best thinker !.Did the Mike used in Vatican come from Heaven?,Y do Pop's documents stored in Laptops instead of leaves and flat stones ?.Did Jesus say so?.Or did Laptops come from Heven?

2.Are you sure?Prove!

3.Atheism na Theism nani tegemezi.Dini imewahi kugundua nini cha maana?.Okay basi hata kisicho cha maana?

Mi sijasema scientists wote ni Atheist!,Na sio lazima wote wawe Atheist.

4.Swali lako litakuwa na maana iwapo Papa atasafiri kwa mwanakondoo kwenda kwao Argentina!,ama aandike mahubil yake kwenye majani ya migomba.Na pale mecca watumie vijinga vya moto kumulikia wakati wa swala!,na shekhe apande ngamia kwenda jordan


5.Sio kwel,Unatakiwa ujue hakuna tajiri anayeamini katika Mungu na kufuata yale asemayo,kama yupo ni mnafiki.

6. Na hakuna Atheist maskini ila kuna Believers mabilini ambao ni maskini.

7. Prove that god exists

1. What?did atheists create laptops? Umeambiwa dini inapinga laptops hadi papa atumie majani? Kwani did the mike come from atheism?Kweli kama alivyokwambia nicholaus bado unakua.
FYI. Science creates laptops not atheism

2. In science we dont prove,we prove in mathematics. In science we provide evidence.

3. Dini sio mtu/tangible thing ili igundue kitu ila wana dini wanagundua kitu. Au uliambiwa dini ni mtu?wala atheism haijagundua chochote hata cha kijinga.

4. Ili iweje[una childish reasoning,unajiita thinker unauliza maswali/hoja za kitoto]

5. Uwezo wako wa kufikiri ndio unaishia hapo. Unawajua matajiri wote duniani na una uhakika hawaamini Mungu?fallacious argument.

6. Una uhakika kua atheist wote ni mabilionea/matajiri?hata wewe ni bilionea/tajiri?

7. Rejea namba 2. Unaonekana hata hujui sayansi inafanyaje kazi. Pili unapotoka kuihusisha atheism na science

 

[Free ideas]

1. What?did atheists create laptops? Umeambiwa dini inapinga laptops hadi papa atumie majani? Kwani did the mike come from atheism?Kweli kama alivyokwambia nicholaus bado unakua.
FYI. Science creates laptops not atheism

2. In science we dont prove,we prove in mathematics. In science we provide evidence.

3. Dini sio mtu/tangible thing ili igundue kitu ila wana dini wanagundua kitu. Au uliambiwa dini ni mtu?wala atheism haijagundua chochote hata cha kijinga.

4. Ili iweje[una childish reasoning,unajiita thinker unauliza maswali/hoja za kitoto]

5. Uwezo wako wa kufikiri ndio unaishia hapo. Unawajua matajiri wote duniani na una uhakika hawaamini Mungu?fallacious argument.

6. Una uhakika kua atheist wote ni mabilionea/matajiri?hata wewe ni bilionea/tajiri?

7. Rejea namba 2. Unaonekana hata hujui sayansi inafanyaje kazi. Pili unapotoka kuihusisha atheism na science

1.Nani kasema science ime-create Laptops??.Niletee mahala nilipoandika hivyo.Usikurupuke

2.kuprovide evidence ndio nini?.Kwa maana nyingine unaprovide evidence ili iweje?.

3.Huajibu swali!

4.Hakuna hoja.

5.yale yale

6.Wapi nimeandika wote?

7.Wapi nimeihusisha Atheism n a science ?

 

[kaka km]

1.Nani kasema science ime-create Laptops??.Niletee mahala nilipoandika hivyo.Usikurupuke

2.kuprovide evidence ndio nini?.Kwa maana nyingine unaprovide evidence ili iweje?.

3.Huajibu swali!

4.Hakuna hoja.

5.yale yale

6.Wapi nimeandika wote?

7.Wapi nimeihusisha Atheism n a science ?

1. Kama huelewi nani kasema hata post yako huielewi na nilichoandika hukukielewa. Nina mashaka na uwezo wako wa kuelewa. Kwa kukusaidia rejea post niliyokukoti na kukujibu.

2. Utakua hukuelewa ulichoandika
3. Hukuelewa swali ulilouliza.
6. Uliposema "hakuna" kuna wengine walibaki au huelewi maana ya hakuna?
7. Soma post yako ya awali.

 

[patience96]

Evolution by natural selection

Evolution in the New Scientist.

The world is divided into things that look designed (like birds and airliners) and things that don't (rocks and mountains). Things that look designed are divided into those that really are designed (submarines and tin openers) and those that aren't (sharks and hedgehogs). The diagnostic of things that look (or are) designed is that their parts are assembled in ways that are statistically improbable in a functional direction. They do something well: for instance, fly.

Darwinian natural selection can produce an uncanny illusion of design. An engineer would be hard put to decide whether a bird or a plane was the more aerodynamically elegant.

So powerful is the illusion of design, it took humanity until the mid-19th century to realize that it is an illusion. In 1859, Charles Darwin announced one of the greatest ideas ever to occur to a human mind: cumulative evolution by natural selection. Living complexity is indeed orders of magnitude too improbable to have come about by chance. But only if we assume that all the luck has to come in one fell swoop. When cascades of small chance steps accumulate, you can reach prodigious heights of adaptive complexity. That cumulative build-up is evolution. Its guiding force is natural selection.

Every living creature has ancestors, but only a fraction have descendants. All inherit the genes of an unbroken sequence of successful ancestors, none of whom died young and none of whom failed to reproduce. Genes that program embryos to develop into adults who can successfully reproduce automatically survive in the gene pool, at the expense of genes that fail. This is natural selection at the gene level, and we notice its consequences at the organism level. There has to be an ultimate source of new genetic variation, and it is mutation. Copies of newly mutated genes are reshuffled through the gene pool by sexual reproduction, and selection removes them from the pool in a way that is non-random.

What makes for success in the business of life varies from species to species. Some swim, some walk, some fly, some climb, some root themselves into the soil and tilt green solar panels toward the sun. All this diversity stems from successive branchings, starting from a single bacterium-like ancestor, which lived between 3 and 4 billion years ago. Each branching event is called a speciation: a breeding population splits into two, and they go their separately evolving ways. Among sexually reproducing species, speciation is said to have occurred when the two gene pools have separated so far that they can no longer interbreed. Speciation begins by accident. When separation has reached the stage where there is no interbreeding even without a geographical barrier, we have the origin of a new species.

Natural selection is quintessentially non-random, yet it is lamentably often miscalled random. This one mistake underlies much of the skeptical backlash against evolution. Chance cannot explain life. Design is as bad an explanation as chance because it raises bigger questions than it answers. Evolution by natural selection is the only workable theory ever proposed that is capable of explaining life, and it does so brilliantly.

Wewe endelea kukariri pamoja na copy & paste.
Evolution haiwezi kuwa na brain mkuu!

 

[Free ideas]

Wewe endelea kukariri pamoja na copy & paste.

Poa,

Evolution haiwezi kuwa na brain mkuu!

Nimeandika wapi evolution ina brain ?.

 

[Free ideas]

Hao ndio watu wa mungu aliye hai!.Kumbe kuna mungu aliyekufa pia!.Ukitaka kujua mungu anaumbwa na wanadamu fuatilia maneno yao.

1.Mungu mmoja asiyeoneka-Kwa hiyo kuna miungu inayoonekana.

2.Mungu mwenye nguvu-kumbe kuna mungu lakini hana nguvu.

3.Alfa na omega-Kumbe kuna miungu mingine ni Alfa tu ama Omega tu.

4.Mungu muweza wa yote-Kumbe kuna mungu asiyeweza yote.

5.Mungu mmoja tu-Kumbe inawezekana wapo wengi.
5.Mungu wa amani.-kumbe kuna mungu wa vita.
6.Mungu asiyeshindwa kitu-kumbe kuna mungu anayeshindwa!.

.Swali langu ni kwamba ikiwa mnajiamini mnamungu mwenye nguvu kwa nini mnatumia kauli ZA ULINGANIFU wakati mnamuelezea?

 

[vasco da gamma]

Here's the simple fact: Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.When we look at ourselves from a universal standpoint, something inside always reminds or informs us that there are bigger and better things to worry about.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, we only have to make sure we are not fooled than ever before.

 

[Nicholas]

1.Nani kasema science ime-create Laptops??.Niletee mahala nilipoandika hivyo.Usikurupuke 2.kuprovide evidence ndio nini?.Kwa maana nyingine unaprovide evidence ili iweje?. 3.Huajibu swali! 4.Hakuna hoja. 5.yale yale 6.Wapi nimeandika wote? 7.Wapi nimeihusisha Atheism n a science ?

Sijui hata km umewahi soma mahali kitu kinaitwa logic na application zake.Logic ina Mungu ndani yake.Ndio maana huwezi elewa utendaji wa Mungu kwa vitu vilivyo around.Kila fikra inaanzia au kulindwa na misingo iliyoanzia ktk universal AXIOMS.Na hapo inaanzia ktk belief kutokea hapo unaweza jenga hoja juu ya hoja bila kuzipinga wala kuwa na mashaka.Misingi ya Mungu nayo inahitaji uamini Misingi fulani ndipo sasa uanze kwenda ukiwa na Hiyo misingi km DIRA, wengi wengi wenu hamna hata reference na markings ktk fikra wala utamaduni .Ndio maana hakuna vitabu vya maana vinavyoweza tumika km reference popote duniani.Na hata mnaposikia waafrika hawaamini ktk UN na pengine na wakiaminiwa matokeo yao yanafanana.Ni kuwa wanapoteza dira ,ni kwamba huwa hawawezo kusanya taaluma zao na uzoefu wao na kuja fikra zinazobanwa na misingi ya taaluma, jamii, na hata misingi inayopeleka jamii iliyo fair na imara.

 

[Nicholas]

Poa, Nimeandika wapi evolution ina brain ?.

Ndio nakuambia unayo kazi ,sana mnafikiri cut and paste na kuwa na material au vyeti ndio kujua au kuwa na elimu?Ili hoja yako isimame ya evolution basi eveolution inahiaji kuwa na "brain kind" ya kuweza paln vitu in so much precise hadi viumbe wote kuweza Pata mutation iliyoishia kupata uzao unaoweza survive.Huwezi ona "brain" wala "intelligence" kwani wewe ni robot tuu km ilivyo kwa waafrica wengi na wa Asia.Huwa ni wepesi sana kujiona kuwa mnajua kuliko waliogundua.Ndipo mnapochekesha na kurudi kwa wanaosema universe inaye DESIGNER ,Master Planner.sasa nyie mnasema CHANCE ,ERRORs(Mutation) etc ndio imefikisha kupata watu na wengine wapo so much gifted.

 

[Nicholas]

Here's the simple fact: Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.When we look at ourselves from a universal standpoint, something inside always reminds or informs us that there are bigger and better things to worry about.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, we only have to make sure we are not fooled than ever before.

Haha..Imagiantion pia iliwapa wabudha mungu wa kutengeneza na kumpa nguvu.Haha...ktk maish akuna very thin line ktk kutumia terminology fulani responsibly na irresponsibly.Hata Mwigulu nae anadhani anachofanya ni uzalendo,kwa nchi na chama chake ila hajui kuna tofauti ya uzalendo wa chama na uzalendo wa nchi.Chama kikiwa kiovu uzalendo si wa nchi tena ni chama kilicho kinyume na nchi. RESPONSIBLE IMAGINATION ITAKUPATIA KILA KITU ILA HAITOPINGANA NA IDEA YA MUUMBA.Kwani umeambia Mungu anakuzuia?mengi tuu amekuachia wewe uyatake na kuyatafuta km unayataka.sasa kuyatafuta ndipo unaweza mwomba akupe njia na kukuonyesha mipaka inayoweza kupotosha.Hata wanasayansi huwa na guidance nyingi za kuwaonyesha km imagination zao si wendawazimu na unaweza wapalekea kutest kitu kinachowamaliza km kuna stage kinakosewa.