Is Singularity a Possibility?

Is Singularity a Possibility?

kha!
''singularity is near'' ndo inajadilika kwa mapana na misamiati mingi hivi?
 
Duh..Bluray kiboko... But quick question for you, how is singularity possible if it is said that there are multiple universes?
 
Julius said:
Dude, can you invoke somebody else (Liafrika Tanzanian) other than this Mpemba guy...
Click to expand...

Sir, like him or hate him, Mpemba has come up with something that can prove and disprove so many things out there. Check out how Bluray is struggling to prove him wrong on the former's sweeping assertion about the irrefutability of the second law of thermodynamics. Now why should we invoke Mpemba where he is needed the most? Focus on the Singularity!
 
Companero said:
Sir, like him or hate him, Mpemba has come up with something that can prove and disprove so many things out there. Check out how Bluray is struggling to prove him wrong on the former's sweeping assertion about the irrefutability of the second law of thermodynamics. Now why should we invoke Mpemba where he is needed the most? Focus on the Singularity!
Click to expand...

I am not struggling, to the contrary by you not pinpointing the point where I am supposedly struggling, you are struggling to show that I am struggling. I provided a lenghty and detailed explanation of how scientific experiments are conducted and how exception to the ruled under tweaked conditions are possible. I invited you to demonstrate the conditions under which The Mpemba Effect is possible and so far you have not materialised that.

I pointed out the core part of the second law of thermodymanics, the part that is deeply entrenched in the arrow of time as entropy.You have not even touched anything on that.

I pointed how one can set special effects to make it appear as if gravity is not acting on the earth by accelerating upwards at 1g, and used this example in validating the position that, if one is not using standardized settings one cannot be said to be operating scientifically, indeed this is the reason why economist use "ceteris paribus" and natural scientists uses "Standard Temperature and Pressure". Nothing has been retorted, reverted, controverted or even simply acknowledged.

Instead, one is reduced to unintelligible dismissals.If you want to dismiss something come correct, withy explanations and plausible comebacks.

Not with tired one liners.You will not like it when I start to engage the one liners gear.Let's not degenerate into that arena.
 
Bluray, back to Theology or rather Biblical Astronomy. It seems this concept of singularity is highly Biblical. Let us turn to the Epiphany in the book of Ezekiel:

"...and behold, a whirlwind came out of the north...infolding itself...Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures...Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward...and they turned not when they went...When they went, they went upon their four sides..."

Now let us compare that epiphany with this Telos of the Apocalypsis in the First Book of Corinthians:

"And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all"

The Singularity is indeed nigh!
 
Companero said:
Sir, like him or hate him, Mpemba has come up with something that can prove and disprove so many things out there. Check out how Bluray is struggling to prove him wrong on the former's sweeping assertion about the irrefutability of the second law of thermodynamics. Now why should we invoke Mpemba where he is needed the most? Focus on the Singularity!
Click to expand...

Mpemba didn't come up with it. He encountered it.
 
Companero said:
Bluray, back to Theology or rather Biblical Astronomy. It seems this concept of singularity is highly Biblical. Let us turn to the Epiphany in the book of Ezekiel:

"...and behold, a whirlwind came out of the north...infolding itself...Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures...Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward...and they turned not when they went...When they went, they went upon their four sides..."

Now let us compare that epiphany with this Telos of the Apocalypsis in the First Book of Corinthians:

"And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all"

The Singularity is indeed nigh!
Click to expand...

I can quote equally irrelevant passages from The Tibetan (Or Egyptian) Book of the Dead, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Edgar Allan Poe, Dr. Isaac Asimov etc.

In fact, I can attribute anything to anybody with an extensive body of works to his name, without the aid of psychedellic thought enhancing substances I might add.

No I am not talking about the big crunch in the given context. Although if you believe god to be the mathematical symmetry of big crunch-big bang you may have a chance of talking the same language with me.

I don't believe in a personal god like that, it is an insult to the forces of nature.
 
Bluray said:
I can quote equally irrelevant passages from The Tibetan (Or Egyptian) Book of the Dead, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Edgar Allan Poe, Dr. Isaac Asimov etc.

In fact, I can attribute anything to anybody with an extensive body of works to his name, without the aid of psychedellic thought enhancing substances I might add.

No I am not talking about the big crunch in the given context. Although if you believe god to be the mathematical symmetry of big crunch-big bang you may have a chance of talking the same language with me.

I don't believe in a personal god like that, it is an insult to the forces of nature.
Click to expand...

Then how comes this Singularity is closely related to the Holy Book? Check out this challenge posed by the Personality of a God you are dismissing:

Can you bind the cluster of the Pleiades, Or loose the belt of Orion?
 
Companero said:
Then how comes this Singularity is closely related to the Holy Book? Check out this challenge posed by the Personality of a God you are dismissing:

Can you bind the cluster of the Pleiades, Or loose the belt of Orion?
Click to expand...

Your arguments (if one can call them that) are repulsively simplistic.

The fact that I cannot walk from Salender Bridge to Ocean Road Hospital does not prove that you can, it does not even prove that you exists.

The fact that I cannot bind the cluster of the Pleiades, circle Betelgeuse or loose the so called belt of Orion, does not prove anything about the existence of a godhead.
 
Bluray said:
I can quote equally irrelevant passages from The Tibetan (Or Egyptian) Book of the Dead, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Edgar Allan Poe, Dr. Isaac Asimov etc.

In fact, I can attribute anything to anybody with an extensive body of works to his name, without the aid of psychedellic thought enhancing substances I might add.

No I am not talking about the big crunch in the given context. Although if you believe god to be the mathematical symmetry of big crunch-big bang you may have a chance of talking the same language with me.

I don't believe in a personal god like that, it is an insult to the forces of nature.
Click to expand...
Kaka taratibu, Mungu yupo bwana
 
Thread maana yake kila mtu achangie siyo wachache. unapoandika kitu ambacho kinaeleweka kwa wachache sidhani kama inaeleweka.

Anyway umeshasema tutoke wacha tujichange
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register