tuusan
JF-Expert Member
- Jun 30, 2016
- 17,972
- 20,221
Re-read
Re-readWhat are you saying?
Conservation brings tourist cash you fool and that contributes to the economy36% of land is set aside for conservation purposes you idiot.
But your potential is high I think ujamaa is the factor costing your economyFanya research kwanza kabla ya kusema mambo kama haya. Sio kweli kama Tanzania inatumia 100% of her land kiuchumi. Sana sana tutakuwa tunefika 40% ila kuna potential ya kuongeza matumizi ya ardhi Tanzania na kuongeza uchumi.
I was unable to read your nonsense, please elaborate on the same nonsense.Re-read
Hahahaha thank you for your turn, you can write a tangible topic so that we can share,ignore my nonsenseI was unable to read your nonsense, please elaborate on the same nonsense.
That's the spirit boy.Hahahaha thank you for your turn, you can write a tangible topic so that we can share,ignore my nonsense
But the principal of ujamaa is equal wealth redistribution. Ujamaa ndio unasaidia to lift huge number of people out of poverty line "If is done correctly." China Vietnam Brazil are big Ujamaa countries, and they've done wonders in making people's lives better.But your potential is high I think ujamaa is the factor costing your economy
Unfortunately, there isn't a single one developed ujamaa country. Then you'll be stunned by how unequal your ujamaa champions are.But the principal of ujamaa is equal wealth redistribution. Ujamaa ndio unasaidia to lift huge number of people out of poverty line "If is done correctly." China Vietnam Brazil are big Ujamaa countries, and they've done wonders in making people's lives better.
Kwanza tujiulize hili dogo, mbuga na hifadhi za taifa ni sehemu ya ngapi ya Tz? Hapo tutajua ni sehemu ya ngapi ya Tz inatumika. Nilishawahi kusikia, hifadhi ya selous ni kubwa kuliko nchi ya Rwanda.Its true because the 2/3 Kenya is desert and contributes slightly to the economy... However with discoveries of oil and gas in wajir coal in kitui the situation is going to change
Halafu hata la Kenya kuwa na jangwa nilikuwa silijui hili, nilijua ina nusu jangwa tu. Jangwa la Kenya ni la mchanga au mawe jamani mnijuze.Its true because the 2/3 Kenya is desert and contributes slightly to the economy... However with discoveries of oil and gas in wajir coal in kitui the situation is going to change
Unfortunately, there isn't a single one developed ujamaa country. Then you'll be stunned by how unequal your ujamaa champions are.
I believe you're familiar with the concept of gini index, it measures the level of inequality with a higher figure showing a more unequal society. The most capitalist nations are arguably the US and UK. So how unequal are they vs those of your Ujamaa brothers?
UK - 31.6
US - 41.1
China - 46.2
Brazil - 51.3
Mbuga uleta revenue ya tourismKwanza tujiulize hili dogo, mbuga na hifadhi za taifa ni sehemu ya ngapi ya Tz? Hapo tutajua ni sehemu ya ngapi ya Tz inatumika. Nilishawahi kusikia, hifadhi ya selous ni kubwa kuliko nchi ya Rwanda.
Hata jangwa pia,,,, hata mchanga ni madini na yanatumika ktk ujenzi nk.Mbuga uleta revenue ya tourism
First, where have I said ujamaa increases inequality? stop misquoting me. I said ujamaa doesn't necessarily translate to the most equal societies (rather leads to more of shared poverty)The question to ask yourself is how many people where lifted out of poverty line in China and Brazil? compare that to US or UK .....and yes there is poverty in US and UK.
Brazil is a country of 200millin people, in the last 10year they lifted 50million people out of poverty line. These are the people they couldn't afford full meal a day or taking there children's to school or even having a running water or electricity.
China has 1.4 billion people, in last 30 years they've lifted 700 million people out of poverty. Most of those people are now living the urban areas with reliable transport system and secure homes. Some families their children have graduates and they have stable jobs.
speaking of inequality, your trying to compare the countries which they have well establish welfare system (US, UK) with the countries which are barely starting to create their own welfare system. BTW welfare is pillar of Ujamaa principals, is about compensating the people who are on lower income with the money obtained from taxing higher earners.
Countries like US, UK, France, Germany Sweden etc they all have elements of Ujamaa in the lives, from politics to health care to housing even to personal income. US Democrat Party the Obama and Clinton is a socialist party, UK Labor Party of Tony Blair is a socialist party. Francois Hollande ruled France until April 2017 with party known as Socialist Party. German Socialist Party has run Germany government and her economy many times before.
So your argument about Ujamaa increases inequality doesn't make sense to me, because is we where to take welfare (which it comes from Ujamaa) out the countries you mention above will have worse inequality you could ever image. On the second though, have you tried to check how Kenya and Tanzania rank on inequality index?