Bantugbro
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 22, 2009
- 4,473
- 4,252
Umesahau kusema kwamba hio 0.3% ya KE wanayomiliki hao mabwana wakubwa ni the so called 'prime land' ndio maana wameshika uchumi wa nchi.
Umesahau kusema kwamba hio 0.3% ya KE wanayomiliki hao mabwana wakubwa ni the so called 'prime land' ndio maana wameshika uchumi wa nchi.huu ni ujinga mtupu... mbona watu wana akili za kimaskini hivi....
70% of Kenya iko north of Kenya ambako hakuna watu.... 80% ya wakenya wanaishi ndani ya 30% of Land mass.. ndani ya hii 30% hao akina Uhuru ndo wanamiliki hayo mashamba yao ya 0.5m hapo hapo ndo kuna mbuga za wanyama kama tsavo east and west.... huko kwdngine hakuna mtu anataka kuishi.... kama akina UAE na Israel wanaweza kyishi kwa true desert... kwanini wakenya wanashindwa kuishi kwa semi-desert environment....
Badala yake mnaanza kuotea ardhi ya kina kenyatta eti mpewe bure... Hebu tupige hesabu...
500, 000 acres of Kenyatta Land is 2024 square kilometers....... Kenya's Land Mass is 580,367 square km...
That would make the (2024/580367)*100 = 0.3% of Kenya's land mass .... Ok, I'll admit its pretty significant for one family to own 0.3% of Kenya but still ... 0.3 is not even a quater of 1% ..... If they are saying this 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million Kenyans... Then why cant they fit in the 99.07% that is left?
Infact, going by their assumtion that 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million citizens... that should also mean than a total of 1% of Kenya (roughly 1.6million acres) can fit 50 million citizens and every family in Kenya can have land... Leaving 99% of the land for other stuff....... So why isnt it the case? ... After failing to do this we then start to look for scapegoats and blame those who took advantage of the system .... Ni kawaida maskini kumlaumu tajiri kwa shida zake but please stop the obsession with this 0.3% when there is 99% just staring at us...
Had you been in President uhuru's shoes, would you have done that? What ever wealth he has inherited also belongs to the family/clan and he as an individual can not do that.If there is any recent land redistribution done in Kenya, someone has to chip in, but the truth is "
"THE KENYATTA FAMILY LAND IS ENOUGH TO SETTLE 20 MILLION PEOPLE"
Rashid Wanjala
[wpsocialite]
During the Presidential debate, Uhuru made the “willing buyer, willing seller†remark (very insensitive to the majority poor) which has ignited debate and fire, testament that people are fed up with Capitalistic answers to historical land injustices at The Coast, Rift Valley and Central Kenya.
Uhuru must know that a key tenet of perfect competition is free flow of information. Kenyatta as President had superior access to land markets information than the other Kenyan willing buyers, he knew where land was available, and at how much.
He knew where land was available. He went there first, and hoarded the commodity in huge quantities. Other willing buyers got the message late and went but found the supplies had been hoarded via phone calls to PCs, DCs etc by Kenyatta.
Okay it’s not Uhuru’s commission, but his is an act of omission by not sharing the loot. 5 decades after the hoarding, he still sits on the commodity. His land is still home to squatters, who are just asking for a “quarter of an acre for the squatter†out of his half a million acres.
Kenyatta family land-half a million acres- can supply 4 million families with an eighth of a plot. If each family has an average of 5 members per family that’s 20 million Kenyans out of 30 million Kenyans.
That’s bottom 65% of landless Kenyans each owning an eighth of an acre. Kenyans could as well kiss land problems goodbye, if Uhuru would lead the House of Kenyatta into stopping being selfish. Land prices would drop, as supply would correct the mismatch with demand. The common men like you and I would for once afford land.  Uhurunomics?
The historical presidential debates were meant to be a milestone of democracy, equality, equity and liberty but Uhuru turned it into a theatre of bragging- reading from a script of the absurd. Capitalistic answers cannot substitute moral questions that are about redistributive justice. For a man to one day rest in peace, compassion is a virtue that has to be exemplified by a rich man.
Even Andrew Carnegie one of the richest men in the early 20th C, unlike Uhuru, owned up to the evils of corporate greed and committed his wealth and last years to charity. And even today, The Carnegie family and trustees continue to advance his ideals of giving back through the Carnegie Endowment Fund. Such is the act that helped him die in peace.
Uhuru has to help his Dad rest in peace. He has to court the landless and/or explain to them why they should let his dad rest in peace. He has the power to restitute the malfeasances meted out on these harmless souls that has no ability to become “willing buyersâ€.
The Rockefeller Foundation is also the brainchild of a family intent on rehabilitating an image of a business empire whose image is mired in a cloud of corporate greed and capitalism without compassion.
Uhuru’s capitalism lacks one ingredient, which is compassion. But to regain the trust of the landless masses he has to rebel against family. He has to shake off family baggage. He has to share the spoils with the masses.
Yes Uhuru’s wealth is a birthright, an inheritance. But he is a man above the  age of majority. He can decline a part of his inheritance, if he wants to regain the moral high ground of redistributive justice. He cannot hide behind his family. The Kenyatta family comprises individuals. Uhuru is “man soloâ€. He can commit his portion of inheritance to a good cause. That’s what the landless masses and the squatters are asking.
However, Uhuru, as usual has chosen family over the nation, as evidenced by his arrogant answer during the Presidential debate. It took Raila’s intervention to save him from the debate-mob of Presidential wonna-bees that was baying for his blood.
And those pissed off by his answers are many, including Joshua Arap Sang’ who made a Youtube video as a rebuttal to Uhuru’s claims that appear to be disrespectful to the poor and desolate. Those so poor, landless and jobless to be willing buyers, and willing sellers.
Huo ni upuuzi wa hali ya juu. Wameshapumbazwa na wakapumbazika.Wanajiita waingereza wa Afrika wa Mashariki.
If there is any recent land redistribution done in Kenya, someone has to chip in, but the truth is "
"THE KENYATTA FAMILY LAND IS ENOUGH TO SETTLE 20 MILLION PEOPLE"
Rashid Wanjala
[wpsocialite]
During the Presidential debate, Uhuru made the “willing buyer, willing seller†remark (very insensitive to the majority poor) which has ignited debate and fire, testament that people are fed up with Capitalistic answers to historical land injustices at The Coast, Rift Valley and Central Kenya.
Uhuru must know that a key tenet of perfect competition is free flow of information. Kenyatta as President had superior access to land markets information than the other Kenyan willing buyers, he knew where land was available, and at how much.
He knew where land was available. He went there first, and hoarded the commodity in huge quantities. Other willing buyers got the message late and went but found the supplies had been hoarded via phone calls to PCs, DCs etc by Kenyatta.
Okay itâ€[emoji769]s not Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s commission, but his is an act of omission by not sharing the loot. 5 decades after the hoarding, he still sits on the commodity. His land is still home to squatters, who are just asking for a “quarter of an acre for the squatter†out of his half a million acres.
Kenyatta family land-half a million acres- can supply 4 million families with an eighth of a plot. If each family has an average of 5 members per family thatâ€[emoji769]s 20 million Kenyans out of 30 million Kenyans.
Thatâ€[emoji769]s bottom 65% of landless Kenyans each owning an eighth of an acre. Kenyans could as well kiss land problems goodbye, if Uhuru would lead the House of Kenyatta into stopping being selfish. Land prices would drop, as supply would correct the mismatch with demand. The common men like you and I would for once afford land.  Uhurunomics?
The historical presidential debates were meant to be a milestone of democracy, equality, equity and liberty but Uhuru turned it into a theatre of bragging- reading from a script of the absurd. Capitalistic answers cannot substitute moral questions that are about redistributive justice. For a man to one day rest in peace, compassion is a virtue that has to be exemplified by a rich man.
Even Andrew Carnegie one of the richest men in the early 20th C, unlike Uhuru, owned up to the evils of corporate greed and committed his wealth and last years to charity. And even today, The Carnegie family and trustees continue to advance his ideals of giving back through the Carnegie Endowment Fund. Such is the act that helped him die in peace.
Uhuru has to help his Dad rest in peace. He has to court the landless and/or explain to them why they should let his dad rest in peace. He has the power to restitute the malfeasances meted out on these harmless souls that has no ability to become “willing buyersâ€.
The Rockefeller Foundation is also the brainchild of a family intent on rehabilitating an image of a business empire whose image is mired in a cloud of corporate greed and capitalism without compassion.
Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s capitalism lacks one ingredient, which is compassion. But to regain the trust of the landless masses he has to rebel against family. He has to shake off family baggage. He has to share the spoils with the masses.
Yes Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s wealth is a birthright, an inheritance. But he is a man above the  age of majority. He can decline a part of his inheritance, if he wants to regain the moral high ground of redistributive justice. He cannot hide behind his family. The Kenyatta family comprises individuals. Uhuru is “man soloâ€. He can commit his portion of inheritance to a good cause. Thatâ€[emoji769]s what the landless masses and the squatters are asking.
However, Uhuru, as usual has chosen family over the nation, as evidenced by his arrogant answer during the Presidential debate. It took Railaâ€[emoji769]s intervention to save him from the debate-mob of Presidential wonna-bees that was baying for his blood.
And those pissed off by his answers are many, including Joshua Arap Sangâ€[emoji769] who made a Youtube video as a rebuttal to Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s claims that appear to be disrespectful to the poor and desolate. Those so poor, landless and jobless to be willing buyers, and willing sellers.
Kwa hivo wanaoishi kwa hizi nyumba hapa wana haki sawa ya kutafuna na wale mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay? Ndio maana nikasema mko pale tulikokua nyakati za Moi..............mnatafunwa na hamjui mnatafunwa. Hata heri sisi nyakati za Moi akina Wangari Maathai, Martin Shikuku, Odinga, Matiba n.k walipiga kelele kiasi ila kwa ukosefu wa independent media nyakati hizo hawakusikika kwa mwananchi wa kawaida. Nyie sahii munayo Social Media na stesheni za TV lakini bado mmelalia masikio.
Jibu Swali nilivyokuuliza...............wanaoishi kwa hizo nyumba nilizoposti wana haki sawa na Mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay?
Had you been in President uhuru's shoes, would you have done that? What ever wealth he has inherited also belongs to the family/clan and he as an individual can not do that.
Plan ilishasukwa na Miundombinu kuwekwa sawa toka enzi,,
hapo kuna marais wote waliowahi kuitawala Kenya tangu ipate Uhuru,
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Hao wana mashamba makubwa usione wana nyumba mbovu ndiyo wanalisha hadi kenyaKwa hivo wanaoishi kwa hizi nyumba hapa wana haki sawa ya kutafuna na wale mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay? Ndio maana nikasema mko pale tulikokua nyakati za Moi..............mnatafunwa na hamjui mnatafunwa. Hata heri sisi nyakati za Moi akina Wangari Maathai, Martin Shikuku, Odinga, Matiba n.k walipiga kelele kiasi ila kwa ukosefu wa independent media nyakati hizo hawakusikika kwa mwananchi wa kawaida. Nyie sahii munayo Social Media na stesheni za TV lakini bado mmelalia masikio.
Safi sana..mkuu umeeleza kinaga ubagahuu ni ujinga mtupu... mbona watu wana akili za kimaskini hivi....
70% of Kenya iko north of Kenya ambako hakuna watu.... 80% ya wakenya wanaishi ndani ya 30% of Land mass.. ndani ya hii 30% hao akina Uhuru ndo wanamiliki hayo mashamba yao ya 0.5m hapo hapo ndo kuna mbuga za wanyama kama tsavo east and west.... huko kwdngine hakuna mtu anataka kuishi.... kama akina UAE na Israel wanaweza kyishi kwa true desert... kwanini wakenya wanashindwa kuishi kwa semi-desert environment....
Badala yake mnaanza kuotea ardhi ya kina kenyatta eti mpewe bure... Hebu tupige hesabu...
500, 000 acres of Kenyatta Land is 2024 square kilometers....... Kenya's Land Mass is 580,367 square km...
That would make the (2024/580367)*100 = 0.3% of Kenya's land mass .... Ok, I'll admit its pretty significant for one family to own 0.3% of Kenya but still ... 0.3 is not even a quater of 1% ..... If they are saying this 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million Kenyans... Then why cant they fit in the 99.07% that is left?
Infact, going by their assumtion that 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million citizens... that should also mean than a total of 1% of Kenya (roughly 1.6million acres) can fit 50 million citizens and every family in Kenya can have land... Leaving 99% of the land for other stuff....... So why isnt it the case? ... After failing to do this we then start to look for scapegoats and blame those who took advantage of the system .... Ni kawaida maskini kumlaumu tajiri kwa shida zake but please stop the obsession with this 0.3% when there is 99% just staring at us...
Ahaaa haaa haaa
Brother I participated in several research regarding land policy and sustainable development. In sub Sahara Africa, Kenya is one of the countries which a common people cannot afford to purchase a piece of land due to high prices. The prices are high because the rich people and elites own big tract of land. All land is grabbed.
Huo ni upuuzi wa hali ya juu. Wameshapumbazwa na wakapumbazika.
Bwahahaaa!!
Hilo la wanawake umelitoa wapi? Labda Kwa makabila la kisomali huko wajir ,mandara na garisa na hilo ni Kwa sababu ya itikadi pamoja na Mila zao Ila sio Kwa wakenya wote . Wanawake wakenya wameruhusiwa kurithi viwanja kutoka Kwa Baba zao na Wana uwezo wa kugawana Mali ya familia pamoja na Mtoto wa kiume Kwa 50% Kwa hivyo leta hoja zenye mantiki na sio habari za vijiweni.Halafu bado wanawake wanakinzwa ktk kumiliki ardhi hili tatzo lingine nalo.