Kenyatta family land is enough to settle 20 million people

Kenyatta family land is enough to settle 20 million people

huu ni ujinga mtupu... mbona watu wana akili za kimaskini hivi....

70% of Kenya iko north of Kenya ambako hakuna watu.... 80% ya wakenya wanaishi ndani ya 30% of Land mass.. ndani ya hii 30% hao akina Uhuru ndo wanamiliki hayo mashamba yao ya 0.5m hapo hapo ndo kuna mbuga za wanyama kama tsavo east and west.... huko kwdngine hakuna mtu anataka kuishi.... kama akina UAE na Israel wanaweza kyishi kwa true desert... kwanini wakenya wanashindwa kuishi kwa semi-desert environment....


Badala yake mnaanza kuotea ardhi ya kina kenyatta eti mpewe bure... Hebu tupige hesabu...


500, 000 acres of Kenyatta Land is 2024 square kilometers....... Kenya's Land Mass is 580,367 square km...

That would make the (2024/580367)*100 = 0.3% of Kenya's land mass .... Ok, I'll admit its pretty significant for one family to own 0.3% of Kenya but still ... 0.3 is not even a quater of 1% ..... If they are saying this 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million Kenyans... Then why cant they fit in the 99.07% that is left?

Infact, going by their assumtion that 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million citizens... that should also mean than a total of 1% of Kenya (roughly 1.6million acres) can fit 50 million citizens and every family in Kenya can have land... Leaving 99% of the land for other stuff....... So why isnt it the case? ... After failing to do this we then start to look for scapegoats and blame those who took advantage of the system .... Ni kawaida maskini kumlaumu tajiri kwa shida zake but please stop the obsession with this 0.3% when there is 99% just staring at us...
Umesahau kusema kwamba hio 0.3% ya KE wanayomiliki hao mabwana wakubwa ni the so called 'prime land' ndio maana wameshika uchumi wa nchi.
 
Umesahau kusema kwamba hio 0.3% ya KE wanayomiliki hao mabwana wakubwa ni the so called 'prime land' ndio maana wameshika uchumi wa nchi.

Teh teh teh tihiii
Kenyatta family and Lord Dalamare.
Ahaaa haaa haaa
 
Guys any updates regarding the issue of land adjudication.
Zunguka kote lkn kwa hili.
Hili ni muhimu.
 
Halafu waingereza wamewashika akili hawa nyang'au kisawasawa. Kila siku wanawapa vijidakika vichache BBC World ili wajione wao ni wa kipekee. Ha ha ha, wanaliwa vizuri.
 
Halafu waingereza wamewashika akili hawa nyang'au kisawasawa. Kila siku wanawapa vijidakika vichache BBC World ili wajione wao ni wa kipekee. Ha ha ha, wanaliwa vizuri.

Wanajiita waingereza wa Afrika wa Mashariki.
 
If there is any recent land redistribution done in Kenya, someone has to chip in, but the truth is "


"THE KENYATTA FAMILY LAND IS ENOUGH TO SETTLE 20 MILLION PEOPLE"

Rashid Wanjala
[wpsocialite]
During the Presidential debate, Uhuru made the “willing buyer, willing seller†remark (very insensitive to the majority poor) which has ignited debate and fire, testament that people are fed up with Capitalistic answers to historical land injustices at The Coast, Rift Valley and Central Kenya.
Uhuru must know that a key tenet of perfect competition is free flow of information. Kenyatta as President had superior access to land markets information than the other Kenyan willing buyers, he knew where land was available, and at how much.
He knew where land was available. He went there first, and hoarded the commodity in huge quantities. Other willing buyers got the message late and went but found the supplies had been hoarded via phone calls to PCs, DCs etc by Kenyatta.
Okay it’s not Uhuru’s commission, but his is an act of omission by not sharing the loot. 5 decades after the hoarding, he still sits on the commodity. His land is still home to squatters, who are just asking for a “quarter of an acre for the squatter†out of his half a million acres.
Kenyatta family land-half a million acres- can supply 4 million families with an eighth of a plot. If each family has an average of 5 members per family that’s 20 million Kenyans out of 30 million Kenyans.
That’s bottom 65% of landless Kenyans each owning an eighth of an acre. Kenyans could as well kiss land problems goodbye, if Uhuru would lead the House of Kenyatta into stopping being selfish. Land prices would drop, as supply would correct the mismatch with demand. The common men like you and I would for once afford land.  Uhurunomics?
The historical presidential debates were meant to be a milestone of democracy, equality, equity and liberty but Uhuru turned it into a theatre of bragging- reading from a script of the absurd. Capitalistic answers cannot substitute moral questions that are about redistributive justice. For a man to one day rest in peace, compassion is a virtue that has to be exemplified by a rich man.
Even Andrew Carnegie one of the richest men in the early 20th C, unlike Uhuru, owned up to the evils of corporate greed and committed his wealth and last years to charity. And even today, The Carnegie family and trustees continue to advance his ideals of giving back through the Carnegie Endowment Fund. Such is the act that helped him die in peace.
Uhuru has to help his Dad rest in peace. He has to court the landless and/or explain to them why they should let his dad rest in peace. He has the power to restitute the malfeasances meted out on these harmless souls that has no ability to become “willing buyersâ€.
The Rockefeller Foundation is also the brainchild of a family intent on rehabilitating an image of a business empire whose image is mired in a cloud of corporate greed and capitalism without compassion.
Uhuru’s capitalism lacks one ingredient, which is compassion. But to regain the trust of the landless masses he has to rebel against family. He has to shake off family baggage. He has to share the spoils with the masses.
Yes Uhuru’s wealth is a birthright, an inheritance. But he is a man above the  age of majority. He can decline a part of his inheritance, if he wants to regain the moral high ground of redistributive justice. He cannot hide behind his family. The Kenyatta family comprises individuals. Uhuru is “man soloâ€. He can commit his portion of inheritance to a good cause. That’s what the landless masses and the squatters are asking.
However, Uhuru, as usual has chosen family over the nation, as evidenced by his arrogant answer during the Presidential debate. It took Raila’s intervention to save him from the debate-mob of Presidential wonna-bees that was baying for his blood.
And those pissed off by his answers are many, including Joshua Arap Sang’ who made a Youtube video as a rebuttal to Uhuru’s claims that appear to be disrespectful to the poor and desolate. Those so poor, landless and jobless to be willing buyers, and willing sellers.
Had you been in President uhuru's shoes, would you have done that? What ever wealth he has inherited also belongs to the family/clan and he as an individual can not do that.
 
Halafu bado wanawake wanakinzwa ktk kumiliki ardhi hili tatzo lingine nalo.
If there is any recent land redistribution done in Kenya, someone has to chip in, but the truth is "


"THE KENYATTA FAMILY LAND IS ENOUGH TO SETTLE 20 MILLION PEOPLE"

Rashid Wanjala
[wpsocialite]
During the Presidential debate, Uhuru made the “willing buyer, willing seller†remark (very insensitive to the majority poor) which has ignited debate and fire, testament that people are fed up with Capitalistic answers to historical land injustices at The Coast, Rift Valley and Central Kenya.
Uhuru must know that a key tenet of perfect competition is free flow of information. Kenyatta as President had superior access to land markets information than the other Kenyan willing buyers, he knew where land was available, and at how much.
He knew where land was available. He went there first, and hoarded the commodity in huge quantities. Other willing buyers got the message late and went but found the supplies had been hoarded via phone calls to PCs, DCs etc by Kenyatta.
Okay itâ€[emoji769]s not Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s commission, but his is an act of omission by not sharing the loot. 5 decades after the hoarding, he still sits on the commodity. His land is still home to squatters, who are just asking for a “quarter of an acre for the squatter†out of his half a million acres.
Kenyatta family land-half a million acres- can supply 4 million families with an eighth of a plot. If each family has an average of 5 members per family thatâ€[emoji769]s 20 million Kenyans out of 30 million Kenyans.
Thatâ€[emoji769]s bottom 65% of landless Kenyans each owning an eighth of an acre. Kenyans could as well kiss land problems goodbye, if Uhuru would lead the House of Kenyatta into stopping being selfish. Land prices would drop, as supply would correct the mismatch with demand. The common men like you and I would for once afford land.  Uhurunomics?
The historical presidential debates were meant to be a milestone of democracy, equality, equity and liberty but Uhuru turned it into a theatre of bragging- reading from a script of the absurd. Capitalistic answers cannot substitute moral questions that are about redistributive justice. For a man to one day rest in peace, compassion is a virtue that has to be exemplified by a rich man.
Even Andrew Carnegie one of the richest men in the early 20th C, unlike Uhuru, owned up to the evils of corporate greed and committed his wealth and last years to charity. And even today, The Carnegie family and trustees continue to advance his ideals of giving back through the Carnegie Endowment Fund. Such is the act that helped him die in peace.
Uhuru has to help his Dad rest in peace. He has to court the landless and/or explain to them why they should let his dad rest in peace. He has the power to restitute the malfeasances meted out on these harmless souls that has no ability to become “willing buyersâ€.
The Rockefeller Foundation is also the brainchild of a family intent on rehabilitating an image of a business empire whose image is mired in a cloud of corporate greed and capitalism without compassion.
Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s capitalism lacks one ingredient, which is compassion. But to regain the trust of the landless masses he has to rebel against family. He has to shake off family baggage. He has to share the spoils with the masses.
Yes Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s wealth is a birthright, an inheritance. But he is a man above the  age of majority. He can decline a part of his inheritance, if he wants to regain the moral high ground of redistributive justice. He cannot hide behind his family. The Kenyatta family comprises individuals. Uhuru is “man soloâ€. He can commit his portion of inheritance to a good cause. Thatâ€[emoji769]s what the landless masses and the squatters are asking.
However, Uhuru, as usual has chosen family over the nation, as evidenced by his arrogant answer during the Presidential debate. It took Railaâ€[emoji769]s intervention to save him from the debate-mob of Presidential wonna-bees that was baying for his blood.
And those pissed off by his answers are many, including Joshua Arap Sangâ€[emoji769] who made a Youtube video as a rebuttal to Uhuruâ€[emoji769]s claims that appear to be disrespectful to the poor and desolate. Those so poor, landless and jobless to be willing buyers, and willing sellers.
 
We kweli fala.
Hao uwezo wao wa kujitaftia ndipo ulipoishia.
Au ww unataka kumfananisha engineer kipato chake na mkulima wa small scale ?
Hao wakipambana wanaweza kwenda kumiliki nyumba kuliko oysterbays.
Kwa hivo wanaoishi kwa hizi nyumba hapa wana haki sawa ya kutafuna na wale mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay? Ndio maana nikasema mko pale tulikokua nyakati za Moi..............mnatafunwa na hamjui mnatafunwa. Hata heri sisi nyakati za Moi akina Wangari Maathai, Martin Shikuku, Odinga, Matiba n.k walipiga kelele kiasi ila kwa ukosefu wa independent media nyakati hizo hawakusikika kwa mwananchi wa kawaida. Nyie sahii munayo Social Media na stesheni za TV lakini bado mmelalia masikio.
Tanzania-Flickr-Ace-Africa-1024x768.jpg
thatchhouse.jpg
 
Kwahyo kila anayeishi oysterbay fisadi?
Hakuna aliyezuiliwa kuendelea.
Hata hao wakiamu kupambana na kusaka mbumba wataendelea pia.
Tatizo la kenya kuna bias kikabila hadi ktk maendeleo.
Morogoro kuna wakulima na. Wanaishi vema.
Tabora Ipuli kuna wakulima kama hao na. Wana majumba.
Jibu Swali nilivyokuuliza...............wanaoishi kwa hizo nyumba nilizoposti wana haki sawa na Mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay?
 
Had you been in President uhuru's shoes, would you have done that? What ever wealth he has inherited also belongs to the family/clan and he as an individual can not do that.

Bro
Content analysis. No where in the article mentioned Uhuru as a natural person own such a big tract of land, it's the family. Even the title of the article says that. Coz everyone may know that Uhuru was not yet born when his parents were looting public land.
 
Kwa hivo wanaoishi kwa hizi nyumba hapa wana haki sawa ya kutafuna na wale mabwenyenye wa Oyster Bay? Ndio maana nikasema mko pale tulikokua nyakati za Moi..............mnatafunwa na hamjui mnatafunwa. Hata heri sisi nyakati za Moi akina Wangari Maathai, Martin Shikuku, Odinga, Matiba n.k walipiga kelele kiasi ila kwa ukosefu wa independent media nyakati hizo hawakusikika kwa mwananchi wa kawaida. Nyie sahii munayo Social Media na stesheni za TV lakini bado mmelalia masikio.
Tanzania-Flickr-Ace-Africa-1024x768.jpg
thatchhouse.jpg
Hao wana mashamba makubwa usione wana nyumba mbovu ndiyo wanalisha hadi kenya
 
Any updates regarding land redistribution and adjudication in Kenya.
 
huu ni ujinga mtupu... mbona watu wana akili za kimaskini hivi....

70% of Kenya iko north of Kenya ambako hakuna watu.... 80% ya wakenya wanaishi ndani ya 30% of Land mass.. ndani ya hii 30% hao akina Uhuru ndo wanamiliki hayo mashamba yao ya 0.5m hapo hapo ndo kuna mbuga za wanyama kama tsavo east and west.... huko kwdngine hakuna mtu anataka kuishi.... kama akina UAE na Israel wanaweza kyishi kwa true desert... kwanini wakenya wanashindwa kuishi kwa semi-desert environment....


Badala yake mnaanza kuotea ardhi ya kina kenyatta eti mpewe bure... Hebu tupige hesabu...


500, 000 acres of Kenyatta Land is 2024 square kilometers....... Kenya's Land Mass is 580,367 square km...

That would make the (2024/580367)*100 = 0.3% of Kenya's land mass .... Ok, I'll admit its pretty significant for one family to own 0.3% of Kenya but still ... 0.3 is not even a quater of 1% ..... If they are saying this 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million Kenyans... Then why cant they fit in the 99.07% that is left?

Infact, going by their assumtion that 0.3% of Kenya can fit 20 million citizens... that should also mean than a total of 1% of Kenya (roughly 1.6million acres) can fit 50 million citizens and every family in Kenya can have land... Leaving 99% of the land for other stuff....... So why isnt it the case? ... After failing to do this we then start to look for scapegoats and blame those who took advantage of the system .... Ni kawaida maskini kumlaumu tajiri kwa shida zake but please stop the obsession with this 0.3% when there is 99% just staring at us...
Safi sana..mkuu umeeleza kinaga ubaga
 
Bwahahaaa!!punguza jazba..endelea ku lease ardhi kw ccm tu[emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]
Ahaaa haaa haaa
Brother I participated in several research regarding land policy and sustainable development. In sub Sahara Africa, Kenya is one of the countries which a common people cannot afford to purchase a piece of land due to high prices. The prices are high because the rich people and elites own big tract of land. All land is grabbed.
 
Bwahahaaa!!

Aha haaa
Any recent development regarding land redistribution and adjudication issue.
The wananchi of Kenya want to hear the news like ... the Dalamare and kenyatta family have surrendered to the government 21,000 hectares to house 1 million kibera households to curb the slum problem.
 
Halafu bado wanawake wanakinzwa ktk kumiliki ardhi hili tatzo lingine nalo.
Hilo la wanawake umelitoa wapi? Labda Kwa makabila la kisomali huko wajir ,mandara na garisa na hilo ni Kwa sababu ya itikadi pamoja na Mila zao Ila sio Kwa wakenya wote . Wanawake wakenya wameruhusiwa kurithi viwanja kutoka Kwa Baba zao na Wana uwezo wa kugawana Mali ya familia pamoja na Mtoto wa kiume Kwa 50% Kwa hivyo leta hoja zenye mantiki na sio habari za vijiweni.

Sent from my CPH1803 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom