Sildenafil Citrate
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 29, 2021
- 577
- 2,595
Katika Dunia hii ya Kidigitali, #Haki ya Faragha na Ulinzi wa Taarifa Binafsi sio suala la kujifurahisha bali ni Hitaji muhimu
Wakati mwingine tunapohitaji Huduma tunatakiwa kutoa Taarifa zetu Binafsi. Lakini je; Kiasi cha Taarifa zinazokusanywa, Matumizi na Uhifadhi wake upoje? Faragha inaheshimiwa?
Ili kupunguza athari zinazoweza kutokea na kulinda #HakiYaFaragha, ni muhimu Watoa Huduma kuwa na Mipaka katika ukusanyaji wa Taarifa zetu
===========
Data flows with trust are critical, not only for a free and open internet, but also for realising human rights online. But none of these benefits can be achieved without robust and comprehensive data protection, data security, privacy safeguards, and human rights frameworks that protect people’s information. In the last decade, governments around the world have made progress in protecting personal data – yet remaining gaps are preventing people from being able to fully exercise their data protection and privacy rights.
The nature of the internet and the online economy demands that data can flow easily, to ensure services are delivered across borders. However, this is not and should not be a free pass to ignore or lower data protection principles. In today’s world, protecting personal data is not a luxury, it is a necessity. Most countries have recognised that privacy is a human right and many of them have adopted, modernised, or started developing data protection frameworks that include tools for data transfers.
Despite legislative progress to protect personal data, many companies have yet to update their practices and business models in a way that respects and promotes data protection and privacy. Huge amounts of information are still being collected, stored, and moved around, and privacy considerations are often secondary.
If these principles are not binding or not enforced, companies and entities will continue to collect more data than they need and the potential for people being harmed will increase. Every minute that unused data remains stored unnecessarily and every time it is transferred across jurisdiction without needing to be, people’s rights are placed at risk. In addition, companies are potentially liable if the data is leaked, misused, or accessed without proper authorisation.
Some companies would justify the continuation of the “collect it all” practices by promising transparency and strong security. These promises are important, but insufficient if not paired with a reduction in the amount of data collected. The best way to prevent data breaches is not to have the data in the first place.
It is also important to think of data minimisation in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. Regulators should address the relationship between the data harvesting business model and the way algorithms are currently being built. Troves of data are often injected into opaque AI and automated systems to place ads, sell products, and even generate text or image content. It is critical that regulators address the misconception that for the digital economy and AI to succeed, as much data as possible is needed, when what is actually needed is the best possible quality of data, which is more limited.
Data protection isn’t about never using any data; it’s about using data in a wise, secure, necessary, and proportionate way. Data minimisation, purpose limitation, data security, and transparency are not interchangeable; each overlapping and complementary principle is as important as another. They allow businesses to operate with confidence and reassure people that they and their information are safe.
Source: Access Now
Wakati mwingine tunapohitaji Huduma tunatakiwa kutoa Taarifa zetu Binafsi. Lakini je; Kiasi cha Taarifa zinazokusanywa, Matumizi na Uhifadhi wake upoje? Faragha inaheshimiwa?
Ili kupunguza athari zinazoweza kutokea na kulinda #HakiYaFaragha, ni muhimu Watoa Huduma kuwa na Mipaka katika ukusanyaji wa Taarifa zetu
===========
Data flows with trust are critical, not only for a free and open internet, but also for realising human rights online. But none of these benefits can be achieved without robust and comprehensive data protection, data security, privacy safeguards, and human rights frameworks that protect people’s information. In the last decade, governments around the world have made progress in protecting personal data – yet remaining gaps are preventing people from being able to fully exercise their data protection and privacy rights.
The nature of the internet and the online economy demands that data can flow easily, to ensure services are delivered across borders. However, this is not and should not be a free pass to ignore or lower data protection principles. In today’s world, protecting personal data is not a luxury, it is a necessity. Most countries have recognised that privacy is a human right and many of them have adopted, modernised, or started developing data protection frameworks that include tools for data transfers.
Despite legislative progress to protect personal data, many companies have yet to update their practices and business models in a way that respects and promotes data protection and privacy. Huge amounts of information are still being collected, stored, and moved around, and privacy considerations are often secondary.
If these principles are not binding or not enforced, companies and entities will continue to collect more data than they need and the potential for people being harmed will increase. Every minute that unused data remains stored unnecessarily and every time it is transferred across jurisdiction without needing to be, people’s rights are placed at risk. In addition, companies are potentially liable if the data is leaked, misused, or accessed without proper authorisation.
Some companies would justify the continuation of the “collect it all” practices by promising transparency and strong security. These promises are important, but insufficient if not paired with a reduction in the amount of data collected. The best way to prevent data breaches is not to have the data in the first place.
It is also important to think of data minimisation in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. Regulators should address the relationship between the data harvesting business model and the way algorithms are currently being built. Troves of data are often injected into opaque AI and automated systems to place ads, sell products, and even generate text or image content. It is critical that regulators address the misconception that for the digital economy and AI to succeed, as much data as possible is needed, when what is actually needed is the best possible quality of data, which is more limited.
Data protection isn’t about never using any data; it’s about using data in a wise, secure, necessary, and proportionate way. Data minimisation, purpose limitation, data security, and transparency are not interchangeable; each overlapping and complementary principle is as important as another. They allow businesses to operate with confidence and reassure people that they and their information are safe.
Source: Access Now
