Kiongozi wa Chechnya aponda na kukosoa majeshi ya Urusi kwa wao kukimbia uwanja wa mapambano

[MK254]

Asema ni kosa kubwa sana limefanyika na litagharimu pakubwa, haamini macho yake majeshi ya Urusi yanaacha silaha za kila aina na kutoroka.

Chechen ambao ni wapiganaji wa kiislamu walijitokeza kuisadia Urusi kwenye hivi vita ila sasa hivi hali imekua sio tena.

Ramzan Kadyrov: ‘If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry …’ Photograph: Chingis Kondarov/Reuters

Shaun Walker
Sun 11 Sep 2022 15.58 BST

Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-appointed leader of Chechnya, has criticised the Russian army’s leadership after it appeared to be caught off guard by Ukraine’s fightback against the Russian invasion in the north-east.

In a sign that the Kremlin may face serious fallout over the loss of territory that the Russian occupation administrations had repeatedly stated they planned to keep “for ever”, Kadyrov also suggested that Vladimir Putin might not be aware of the real state of affairs.

“They have made mistakes and I think they will draw the necessary conclusions,” Kadyrov said in an audio message posted to his Telegram channel on Sunday.

“If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry and the leadership of the country to explain the real situation on the ground to them. It’s a very interesting situation. It’s astounding, I would say,” said Kadyrov, a former rebel turned Kremlin ally who rules Chechnya – a Russian republic in the Caucasus – with an iron fist and has a paramilitary force at his command.

Since the invasion in February, the Kremlin has focused on silencing liberal voices critical of the war, but as things go sour on the battlefield, Putin faces a headache with what to do with former cheerleaders who want Russia to commit more forces to the war to turn the tide.

Many units from Chechnya have taken part in Russia’s war effort, and while Kadyrov is ostensibly hyper-loyal to Moscow, he is one of the few Russian political figures whose messaging the Kremlin does not fully control.

All eyes will be on how Putin responds to the retreat. He has previously glossed over claims that he made a terrible miscalculation in February when he thought the Russian army could overrun Ukraine in a matter of days. In a recent appearance he said Russia had “lost nothing” during the war, but the major losses of recent days could be a harder sell to the Russian population.

Putin loyalist Kadyrov criticises Russian army’s performance over Ukraine retreat

Ramzan Kadyrov, Kremlin-appointed Chechnya leader, suggests Putin might not be fully aware of true state of affairs

www.theguardian.com

 

[Axel Lloyd]

Mpaka hawa naskia wametoka baruuu

 

[Retired]

MK254 hii vita sasa imefika wapi? majeshi ya Russia bado yanapigana au yamepoa/retreat kwanza? Na hii imewezekanaje mana Russia ni super power?

 

[HIMARS]

Huyu atadondoka

 

[Muju4]

Huyu anataka kumponza Vlad maana yeye mwenyewe ameshaomba kustaafu ameona kifo kipo karibu naye.

 

[kp kipanya44]

Hiki kipigo anachopokea super pawer wa mchongo kitaondoka na kiti Cha mtu hapo klemlin

 

[MK254]

MK254 hii vita sasa imefika wapi? majeshi ya Russia bado yanapigana au yamepoa/retreat kwanza? Na hii imewezekanaje mana Russia ni super power?

Kwa sasa hivi Warusi wanatoroka kuepuka kuzingirwa maana supplies zilishakatwa, HIMARS zilitumika kukata mizizi ya supplies Warusi wakabaki wamechanganyikiwa, kisha ghafla Ukraine wakaanza kuzingira, Warusi wakaona isiwe tabu wakatoka nduki na kuacha silaha za maana sana ambazo zitatumika sasa dhidi yao.

Ukraine hawatoi habari wapi wanapiga, wamefungua several fronts na kushambulia.

kwa kifupi Urusi ilibugi sana kwenye huu ugomvi, maana wanajeshi wa Urusi hawaoni tija ya kufia kwa watu na ugomvi ambao hawaelewi nini faida yake.

 

[Retired]

wanajeshi wa Urusi hawaoni tija ya kufia kwa watu na ugomvi ambao hawaelewi nini faida yake.

Hapa umeongea kweli. Hawaoni sababu ya kufa and therefore have no moral to fight

Morals of War

In addition, there are three principles for conduct in war:
1. Discrimination (distinguishing between enemy combatants and non-combatants)

2. Proportionality (the harms must be proportional to the gains)

3. Actions must be militarily necessary.

 

[Retired]

The ethics of warfare: Is it ever morally right to kill on a massive scale​

In 'Perspectives'​

• Histories of a Global University: Exploring Empire at the University of Birmingham
• Past debates and perspectives

War has been puzzling philosophers for centuries, and it isn’t hard to see why. What could be more intuitive or ethical than the belief that it is morally wrong to kill on a massive scale?

However, many would argue that there are times when war is morally permissible, and even obligatory. The most famous way of ethically assessing war is to use ‘Just War Theory’; a tradition going back to St. Augustine in the 5th Century and St. Thomas in the 13th Century. Just War theory considers the reasons for going to war (Jus ad bellum) and the conduct of war (Jus in bello). This distinction is important. A war might be ethical but the means unethical, for instance, using landmines, torture, chemicals and current debate is concerned with drones.

Just War theory sets out principles for a war to be ethical. The war must be:

• Waged by a legitimate authority (usually interpreted as states)
• In a just cause
• Waged with right intention
• Have a strong probability of success
• Be a last resort
• Be proportional

In addition, there are three principles for conduct in war:

• Discrimination (distinguishing between enemy combatants and non-combatants)
• Proportionality (the harms must be proportional to the gains)
• Actions must be militarily necessary

When attempting to apply and interpret these principles considerable disagreement arises, as evidenced by the – still ongoing – debate about the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq. Just war principles are used to address the question of whether the war lacked legitimate authority without a UN Resolution.

Legitimate authority is at issue in all conflicts, including those considered to be acts of terrorism or insurgency. Think about recent uprisings such as the 2011 ousting of Gaddafi's regime in Libya and the other movements loosely termed the Arab Spring; and most timely the current debate about whether to arm the ‘rebels’ in Syria. Are these legitimate authorities? And does legitimate authority make sense anymore?

Establishing ‘just cause’ is also problematic, for example, self-defence is widely recognised, and the UN Charter grants states a right to defend themselves. However, other ‘just causes’ are more difficult to defend. Particularly controversial is humanitarian intervention, even though it is sometimes seen as obligatory and indeed, the most ethical reason for war. It was for humanitarian reasons that NATO intervened in Kosovo in 1999, but, there are other instances where humanitarian disasters are left (perhaps most controversially the failure to intervene in the Rwandan genocide in 1994).

All criteria are problematic and hard to meet. Think about ‘right intention’ with regard to the 2003 Iraq war and discussions about the ‘real’ motives of Bush and Blair. And when we come to proportionality, the contemporary debate is particularly fraught. Can it ever be proportional to use drones where there is no risk to life on one side and risk to many lives (including civilian lives) on the other? And when battles are fought in villages and homes by those with no uniforms, how can the principle of discrimination ever be respected – and indeed should it be?

The character of war is changing fast and the ethics needs to keep pace with that change. These particular principles might well need revision. But we should not imagine the fundamental ethical issues have changed. It is still the case that in a sense war is inherently unethical. To be justified, significant ethical reasons are required and although imperfect Just War theory continues to be one way to seek such reasons.


Heather Widdows, Professor of Global Ethics, Department of Philosophy, Co-Leader of Saving Humans IAS theme

 

[T14 Armata]

Kadyrov huwa hampendi kabisa Sergei Shoigu yule Waziri wa Ulinzi. Hata hivyo Kadyrov mwanzoni mwa hii operation vikosi vyake vilipewa gears muhimu na vikaishia kujirekodi Tiktok videos kama sehemu ya propaganda. Command structure ya wapiganaji wa Urusi na Kadyrovites ni tofauti, hata makamanda wa Urusi hawawapendi kwa vile hawachukui kazi ngumu na hawakuwa na achievements wakati wanachukua supplies nyingi.

Kadyrov alienda akijua mission ya wiki chache. Sasa hivi yeye na watu wake hawako hata frontline

 

[Njiwa wangu]

Sawa

 

[Muju4]

Mzee wa Tik Tok yupo hapo kumjaza Vlad aendelee kuchezea za uso.

 

[Come27]

Mzee wa Tik Tok yupo hapo kumjaza Vlad aendelee kuchezea za uso.

Yule Ramzan Kadrov mbabe wa vita ya tik tok. USA spy wote macho yapo kwy sensitive ishu yeye analeta upuuzi wa kichina wa Tik Tok. USA Spy walikuwa wanamlia timing wamkamate akaonyeshe ubabe wake kule kwy kambi ya barafu Alaska. Akashitukia akajitangaza kustaafu, Russia wanamrushia madongo kwamba kakikmbia. Ni kweli amekimbia mziki mzito wa kiyahudi na American na kilanja England

Sent from my Nokia 1 Plus using JamiiForums mobile app

 

[Last emperor]

Watu wa upinde kwa kujitekenya na kucheka hamuwezekani. Lakin ndo kawaida yenu

 

[Narumu kwetu]

Asema ni kosa kubwa sana limefanyika na litagharimu pakubwa, haamini macho yake majeshi ya Urusi yanaacha silaha za kila aina na kutoroka......
Chechen ambao ni wapiganaji wa kiislamu walijitokeza kuisadia Urusi kwenye hivi vita ila sasa hivi hali imekua sio tena.

Ramzan Kadyrov: ‘If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry …’ Photograph: Chingis Kondarov/Reuters

Shaun Walker
Sun 11 Sep 2022 15.58 BST



Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-appointed leader of Chechnya, has criticised the Russian army’s leadership after it appeared to be caught off guard by Ukraine’s fightback against the Russian invasion in the north-east.
In a sign that the Kremlin may face serious fallout over the loss of territory that the Russian occupation administrations had repeatedly stated they planned to keep “for ever”, Kadyrov also suggested that Vladimir Putin might not be aware of the real state of affairs.


“They have made mistakes and I think they will draw the necessary conclusions,” Kadyrov said in an audio message posted to his Telegram channel on Sunday.


“If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry and the leadership of the country to explain the real situation on the ground to them. It’s a very interesting situation. It’s astounding, I would say,” said Kadyrov, a former rebel turned Kremlin ally who rules Chechnya – a Russian republic in the Caucasus – with an iron fist and has a paramilitary force at his command.

Since the invasion in February, the Kremlin has focused on silencing liberal voices critical of the war, but as things go sour on the battlefield, Putin faces a headache with what to do with former cheerleaders who want Russia to commit more forces to the war to turn the tide.


Many units from Chechnya have taken part in Russia’s war effort, and while Kadyrov is ostensibly hyper-loyal to Moscow, he is one of the few Russian political figures whose messaging the Kremlin does not fully control.

All eyes will be on how Putin responds to the retreat. He has previously glossed over claims that he made a terrible miscalculation in February when he thought the Russian army could overrun Ukraine in a matter of days. In a recent appearance he said Russia had “lost nothing” during the war, but the major losses of recent days could be a harder sell to the Russian population.

Putin loyalist Kadyrov criticises Russian army’s performance over Ukraine retreat

Ramzan Kadyrov, Kremlin-appointed Chechnya leader, suggests Putin might not be fully aware of true state of affairs

www.theguardian.com

Huyu kiongoz anajiona yeye mjuaji kuliko Russia ambao wako Field ,aende tumwone ,Russia sio mafala kukimbia hali haiku's shwar ni shambuliz ambalo hawakuwah kuwaza

 

[Kimbukiko]

Asema ni kosa kubwa sana limefanyika na litagharimu pakubwa, haamini macho yake majeshi ya Urusi yanaacha silaha za kila aina na kutoroka......
Chechen ambao ni wapiganaji wa kiislamu walijitokeza kuisadia Urusi kwenye hivi vita ila sasa hivi hali imekua sio tena.

Ramzan Kadyrov: ‘If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry …’ Photograph: Chingis Kondarov/Reuters

Shaun Walker
Sun 11 Sep 2022 15.58 BST



Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-appointed leader of Chechnya, has criticised the Russian army’s leadership after it appeared to be caught off guard by Ukraine’s fightback against the Russian invasion in the north-east.
In a sign that the Kremlin may face serious fallout over the loss of territory that the Russian occupation administrations had repeatedly stated they planned to keep “for ever”, Kadyrov also suggested that Vladimir Putin might not be aware of the real state of affairs.


“They have made mistakes and I think they will draw the necessary conclusions,” Kadyrov said in an audio message posted to his Telegram channel on Sunday.


“If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry and the leadership of the country to explain the real situation on the ground to them. It’s a very interesting situation. It’s astounding, I would say,” said Kadyrov, a former rebel turned Kremlin ally who rules Chechnya – a Russian republic in the Caucasus – with an iron fist and has a paramilitary force at his command.

Since the invasion in February, the Kremlin has focused on silencing liberal voices critical of the war, but as things go sour on the battlefield, Putin faces a headache with what to do with former cheerleaders who want Russia to commit more forces to the war to turn the tide.


Many units from Chechnya have taken part in Russia’s war effort, and while Kadyrov is ostensibly hyper-loyal to Moscow, he is one of the few Russian political figures whose messaging the Kremlin does not fully control.

All eyes will be on how Putin responds to the retreat. He has previously glossed over claims that he made a terrible miscalculation in February when he thought the Russian army could overrun Ukraine in a matter of days. In a recent appearance he said Russia had “lost nothing” during the war, but the major losses of recent days could be a harder sell to the Russian population.

Putin loyalist Kadyrov criticises Russian army’s performance over Ukraine retreat

Ramzan Kadyrov, Kremlin-appointed Chechnya leader, suggests Putin might not be fully aware of true state of affairs

www.theguardian.com

Huyu mvaa kobaz mlamba viatu WA Putin wakimshika wamminye mbupu na kumnyoa huo mzuzu WA ndevu Kwa kigae cha chupa

 

[Kimbukiko]

Asema ni kosa kubwa sana limefanyika na litagharimu pakubwa, haamini macho yake majeshi ya Urusi yanaacha silaha za kila aina na kutoroka......
Chechen ambao ni wapiganaji wa kiislamu walijitokeza kuisadia Urusi kwenye hivi vita ila sasa hivi hali imekua sio tena.

Ramzan Kadyrov: ‘If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry …’ Photograph: Chingis Kondarov/Reuters

Shaun Walker
Sun 11 Sep 2022 15.58 BST



Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-appointed leader of Chechnya, has criticised the Russian army’s leadership after it appeared to be caught off guard by Ukraine’s fightback against the Russian invasion in the north-east.
In a sign that the Kremlin may face serious fallout over the loss of territory that the Russian occupation administrations had repeatedly stated they planned to keep “for ever”, Kadyrov also suggested that Vladimir Putin might not be aware of the real state of affairs.


“They have made mistakes and I think they will draw the necessary conclusions,” Kadyrov said in an audio message posted to his Telegram channel on Sunday.


“If today or tomorrow no changes in strategy are made, I will be forced to speak with the leadership of the defence ministry and the leadership of the country to explain the real situation on the ground to them. It’s a very interesting situation. It’s astounding, I would say,” said Kadyrov, a former rebel turned Kremlin ally who rules Chechnya – a Russian republic in the Caucasus – with an iron fist and has a paramilitary force at his command.

Since the invasion in February, the Kremlin has focused on silencing liberal voices critical of the war, but as things go sour on the battlefield, Putin faces a headache with what to do with former cheerleaders who want Russia to commit more forces to the war to turn the tide.


Many units from Chechnya have taken part in Russia’s war effort, and while Kadyrov is ostensibly hyper-loyal to Moscow, he is one of the few Russian political figures whose messaging the Kremlin does not fully control.

All eyes will be on how Putin responds to the retreat. He has previously glossed over claims that he made a terrible miscalculation in February when he thought the Russian army could overrun Ukraine in a matter of days. In a recent appearance he said Russia had “lost nothing” during the war, but the major losses of recent days could be a harder sell to the Russian population.

Putin loyalist Kadyrov criticises Russian army’s performance over Ukraine retreat

Ramzan Kadyrov, Kremlin-appointed Chechnya leader, suggests Putin might not be fully aware of true state of affairs

www.theguardian.com

Huyu chawa WA Putin Kwanza ni puppet aliowekwa Kwa hisani ya Putin hapo madarakani

 

[Muju4]

Yule Ramzan Kadrov mbabe wa vita ya tik tok. USA spy wote macho yapo kwy sensitive ishu yeye analeta upuuzi wa kichina wa Tik Tok. USA Spy walikuwa wanamlia timing wamkamate akaonyeshe ubabe wake kule kwy kambi ya barafu Alaska. Akashitukia akajitangaza kustaafu, Russia wanamrushia madongo kwamba kakikmbia. Ni kweli amekimbia mziki mzito wa kiyahudi na American na kilanja England

Sent from my Nokia 1 Plus using JamiiForums mobile app

Vlad asipojiangalia huyu bwana atamuingiza mkenge, ipo report kanapenda sana attention.

 

[Aleyn]

Kwa sasa hivi Warusi wanatoroka kuepuka kuzingirwa maana supplies zilishakatwa, HIMARS zilitumika kukata mizizi ya supplies Warusi wakabaki wamechanganyikiwa, kisha ghafla Ukraine wakaanza kuzingira, Warusi wakaona isiwe tabu wakatoka nduki na kuacha silaha za maana sana ambazo zitatumika sasa dhidi yao.

Ukraine hawatoi habari wapi wanapiga, wamefungua several fronts na kushambulia.

kwa kifupi Urusi ilibugi sana kwenye huu ugomvi, maana wanajeshi wa Urusi hawaoni tija ya kufia kwa watu na ugomvi ambao hawaelewi nini faida yake.

Faida zake wameambiwa, ila hawataki kufa kisa mtu mmoja ametaka mambo yawe hiviii, am sure wapiganaji wote waliofront wa Russia huko Ukraine, Hawataki hii vita kabisa.

 

[SirChief]

MK254 hii vita sasa imefika wapi? majeshi ya Russia bado yanapigana au yamepoa/retreat kwanza? Na hii imewezekanaje mana Russia ni super power?

Correction,Russia is regional power with 19th century logistic command,Huwezi pigana modern warfare with outdated logistic strategy.Hii vita imeonyesha weakness kubwa sana kwenye jeshi la Urusi hasa logistics.
There is a say ""Soldiers win battles,logistics win wars"Ukifeli logistics umefeli vita.
Ukraine waligundu udhaifu huu toka vita ya Kyiv na ndio sababu Russia kushindwa battle for Kyiv,Na Russi wasipokuwa makini usishangae tunarudi square one,ramani ya 2014.