Hapo kwenye red it could mean either way unless mleta mada a-clarify zaidi. Siwezi kusema whether or not ni sexual abuse because I was not there. Neither had I heard the story from the doctor, so I can make an impartial opinion. The facts provided by mleta hoja are also very limited to make an informed opinion.
Having said that unafikiri hata angeitwa nurse as a third party to witness the examination, it would have made a difference? Mgonjwa angelalamika maumivu, daktari angesema ni kawaida and there would be nothing a nurse working in our medical system could have done. A doctor may still fail to maintain a professional rapport with patient, uphold patients' dignity and respect their privacy even where there is a third party.
To me, I think it is a reasonable to perform a physical examination, including breast and pelvic examination, without the presence of a third party in the room unless the woman indicates a desire for one to be present. If the woman wants a third person to be in the room, her wishes should then be respected. To me it is for the doctor to maintain a professional rapport with his patient, uphold patient' dignity and respect her privacy even in the absence of a third party.
I think the goal here should be to engender trust and confidence between the doctor and patient in order to make patients as comfortable as possible. If the practice is to have a third party to audit such examination, how would the doctors feel? Not trusted? Insisting having a third person during examination may undermine the trust and confidence between the doctor and patient. In deed, for many patients, it turns out a third party can make them feel uncomfortable.
But kama daktari amekiuka ethics zilizowekwa then necessary actions should be taken.