Loss making KQ spending $142m annually on leasing aircraft, report shows

Loss making KQ spending $142m annually on leasing aircraft, report shows

I don't think there is a difference between leasing an aircraft and buying it outright in terms of money. But leasing an aircraft is certainly more advantageous than buying, that's why you will never see serious billionaires owning a yatch, they will lease them.... This is because from the moment you buy such an expensive piece of machine every year the asset depreciates in value, eventually, it's going to be worthless...

I know not all planes are leased at the same amount but let's do an average calculation for KQ. So on average KQ spends $142 million ÷ 20 planes = $7 million as lease fees for each plane...
Let's say the plane's life span is 25 years so in 25 years KQ would have paid $177m and if it was 30 years KQ would have paid $210m which is almost about the same price as a Dreamliner....... As we have said, expensive workhorses like that depreciate over time, so if you try to sell it, you would loose alot of money, but if you leased it, and you are not making money off of it, you can just give it back, also if the plane had serious accident that was not really your fault (i.e what happened to Ethiopian flight) you don't cover the cost or suffer the financial loss also since you don't own the plane , you don't pay the insurance premium you only pay a small depreciation fee.... And that is why many airlines preference leasing than owning , so that they can concentrate on the business of flying people, no managing aircrafts
Hahahahaha, tumia Google uangalie ni wakati gani ni bora kununua ndege, na ni wakati gani ni vizuri kukodisha ndege hata kama ni matumizi binafsi.
Kwa ufupi, kwa private person, kama kwa mwaka unasafiri zaidi ya Massa 250, it is cheap to buy your own plane.

Kwenya biashara yoyote ile ya muda mrefu, ni cheap and convenience kununua kuliko kukodi equipments, hakuna shirika lolote kubwa la ndege hapa duniani ambalo linafanya biashara kwa muda mrefu na linatumia ndege za kukodi zaidi ya 35% ya ndege zake na linatengeneza faida, Kenya is a failed state.


Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Hahahahaha, tumia Google uangalie ni wakati gani ni bora kununua ndege, na ni wakati gani ni vizuri kukodisha ndege hata kama ni matumizi binafsi.
Kwa ufupi, kwa private person, kama kwa mwaka unasafiri zaidi ya Massa 250, it is cheap to buy your own plane.

Kwenya biashara yoyote ile ya muda mrefu, ni cheap and convenience kununua kuliko kukodi equipments, hakuna shirika lolote kubwa la ndege hapa duniani ambalo linafanya biashara kwa muda mrefu na linatumia ndege za kukodi zaidi ya 35% ya ndege zake na linatengeneza faida, Kenya is a failed state.


Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Mwanzo jifundishe tofauti ya kukodi(rent) na Ku lease.
Alafu kama ulikua hujui karibia 70% ya mashariki yote makuu ya ndege hua Yana lease ndege badala ya kununua
 
Mwanzo jifundishe tofauti ya kukodi(rent) na Ku lease.
Alafu kama ulikua hujui karibia 70% ya mashariki yote makuu ya ndege hua Yana lease ndege badala ya kununua
Wewe ni mwongo tena mwongo hasa, hakuna, tena ninakuambia kwa uhakika, hakuna shirika la ndege hapa duniani ambalo linaendeshwa kwa kukodisha ndege zaidi ya 35% ya ndege zake. Anzia hapo ET, KLM, Turkey, BA, Lufthansa, Oman, SA, nitajie shirika la ndege, au kampuni yoyote ya usafirishaji kubwa na ya kudumu ambayo vyombo vyake vya usafiri wamekodisha zaidi ya 35% na bado linaendeshwa kwa ufanisi na muda mrefu.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
ET has 3 times the aircraft KQ operates, its high time they expand to 2 or 3 hubs in Africa..But that is besides the point..Emirates/ Etihad/ Qatar wouldnt mind a hub in east africa in an effort to capture the market
Stop deluding yourself, Ethiopia will never expand their hub to JKIA. They have more than 100 planes but they never pay a single cent to run bole international airport, but their profit is not more than $150m , they simply don't have the financial muscle to start paying over $700m a year to make JKIA their second hub from home, they can only increase the frequency of flights but they can't start hanging around paying exorbitant parking fees when they could be hanging around for free at Bole.

The middle Eastern carriers are also subsidised just like Ethiopian, but unlike Ethiopia, those carriers make huge profits also they could run on losses for 10 straight years and no one would care since they can pump oil money untill they start making profit again...
But let's think of it for a sec, Tz did not a national carrier for a while, why didn't Ethiopia or Emirates make it their hub? Why didn't Ethihad make Nigeria it's hub yet they account for like 25% of passengers on the continent and they have an economy 5 times bigger than Kenya, the same for Angola which also doesn't have a national carrier. Why isn't Rwanda becoming a hub yet they have all the necessary infrastructure and are very business friendly?
 
This article is very sweet so more money from KQ goes directly to KAA all the money stays in Kenya.. KQ should then be allowed to run JKIA or KAA to allow KQ run without paying any fees... That way KQ will lower its ticket prices make it competitive and it would acquire more airplanes.. KAA can still make profits from other Airlines since it doesn't have huge expenditures.
Kenya Airways spending $142m annually on leasing aircraft, report shows
MONDAY APRIL 15 2019

Esther Koimet Sebastian Mikosz

Transport Principal Secretary Esther Koimet (left) and KQ CEO Sebastian Mikosz at a meeting on the proposed plan to manage Kenya Airports Authority on February 26, 2019. PHOTO | DIANA NGILA | NMG

In Summary
  • The servicing loans accounts for up to 11 per cent of the airline’s operating costs—way above the global average of five per cent.
  • KQ also told parliament that $53 million of the total amount covers aircraft depreciation costs, leaving $89 million for actual servicing of the leasing costs.
  • KQ has in the past two years revealed that it spent $170 million to clear its tax obligations with Kenya Revenue Authority.
olingo.jpg

By ALLAN OLINGO
More by this Author

Troubled national carrier Kenya Airways spends a whopping $142 million annually to service the onerous leasing contracts it signed with financiers to acquire 20 aircraft, a new report shows.

The confidential report, which was submitted to the Transport committee of the Kenyan parliament, means servicing loans accounts for up to 11 per cent of the airline’s operating costs — way above the global average of five per cent.

Kenya Airways, which is struggling to rise from the depths of historic corporate loss-making, also told parliament that $53 million of the total amount covers aircraft depreciation costs, leaving $89 million for actual servicing of the leasing costs.

For the first time last week, Kenya Airways revealed that 11 firms including Bank of China Aviation, China Development Bank Leasing, Nordic Aviation Capital, GE Capital Aviation Services and Aviation Capital Group bankrolled the carrier’s leasing of 20 aircraft, which is half its fleet.

KQ, as the Kenyan carrier is popularly known, also named individuals behind its controversial ownership of Boeing 787, 737-800 and Embraer 190 aircraft through two privately-owned entities Tsavo and Samburu.

The carrier’s chief executive Sebastian Mikosz, said Samburu is owned by Karen Karita Ellerbe, Jonathan David Herrick, Evert Brunekreef and Christopher Bryan, while Tsavo Aircraft Financing LLC is owned by the Wilmington Trust Company registered in the US.

And in a revelation meant to anchor its role as the key tenant at Nairobi’s Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, KQ disclosed that it pays $650 million annually to the Kenya Airports Authority—for use of the airport as its hub.

Landing fees
That amount does not include the $160 million it pays KAA in annual landing fees, $4 million in building and utilities rents and $2 million in concession fees.

“Furthermore, KQ pays KAA the Airport Pax Service Charge [APSC] that is dependent on the number of passengers departing from Kenya with the airline.

“In KQ’s case, that fee amounts to $430 million annually, accounting for approximately 50 per cent of JKIA’s total revenue from APSC per year,” the airline says in its report to parliament.

KQ has partly argued that should its proposal to run JKIA stand, travellers would see a drop in ticket costs in line with the reduction in the service charge, making it competitive in its operating hub.

But the revelation also means that KQ accounts for half of JKIA revenues, and KAA would be the biggest casualty should the heavy debt burden bring the airline down.

KQ has in the past two years revealed that it spent $170 million to clear its tax obligations with Kenya Revenue Authority, but carries security guarantees from Exim bank for six of its Boeing 787 Dreamliner’s, one Boeing 77-300 aircraft and one GEnx Engine.

Airport management
The airline has argued that KAA is currently running the airport on a faulty traditional aeronautical to non-traditional revenue structure of 81:19 compared with well-managed international airports whose revenues are split at a ratio of 60:40.

Landing fees, Airport Pax Service Charge and others make the traditional aeronautical revenues while duty-free shops, concessions paid by airport operators, ground handlers and fuel providers constitute non-aeronautical revenues.

This means that under the JKIA revenue structure, 81 per cent of KAA revenues come from aeronautical services including landing charges, air passenger charges, parking charges, airlift fees, fuelling revenue and fuelling up-lift fee—partly contributing to Kenya Airways’ high cost base.

“It is crucial to grow non-aeronautical revenue in order to balance the revenue streams and cut the cost of core aeronautical services, making the airport more competitive to attract more traffic,” said Kenya Airways.

KQ told parliament that it expects to start reaping the benefits of fuel hedging this month, as the fuel curve projections point to an increase in prices.

The carrier also said that it wholly owned the other half of its fleet, but only three Boeing 737-300s have been fully paid for.

Kenya Airways documents show that six Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft and one Boeing 777-300 financed by Citi Bank, Cairo headquartered Afrexim Bank and JP Morgan banks are still on loan.

Another 10 Embraer 190 financed by Standard Chartered Bank International and Afrexim Bank are also still on loan.

Kenya Airways also revealed that its captains are paid some of the highest salaries at Ksh1.6 million a month, while its First Officers take home Ksh900,000 ($9,000) a month.

The airline pays flight operators Ksh225,000 ($2,250) while ground service crew, technical, commercial and cargo employees take home Ksh150,000 ($1,500).

“A KQ captain earns on average 11 times more than the average employee in other high salary sectors, and 29 times more than the private sector average....While significant salaries of the pilots are not unusual in the industry due to influential trade unions and political pressure on national careers, remuneration of the Kenya Airways’ pilots is substantial even in comparison with their peers from wealthy economies,” the airline notes.

But despite KQ’s spirited effort to defend its proposed takeover of JKIA management, Kenya’s Transport ministry officials appeared to beat a retreat.

“Following concerns that have been raised by the public, we are now exploring other options of delivering the objectives of the government to consolidate our aviation sector.

“Once an agreed option has been identified we will submit the same to the Cabinet for approval,” Kenya’s transport cabinet secretary James Macharia said.


Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
The most foolish Idea of the year.. Stupid dunder head...I think you use your ass hole (anus) or rectum full of 5 days faeces to reason even when ATCL had one bombardier and KQ had more flights than any airline in JNIA... ATCL's hub was JNIA
1) ATCL has no planes, they do not have any depreciating asset in form of an aircraft on its balance sheet. They are all leased..
What ATCL does not do is lease aircraft from ghost companies in the jersey islands..The lease cheaply from their own government
2)KAA can actually make more money in absence of KQ which upto now has 4bn unpaid fees..Should KQ cease to exist, JKIA is a major hub and Many Airlines would bid to be the hub's main carrier..Ethiopian would certainly want that hub, and possibly Rwandair Combined effort with ATCL
3)KQ is a private company, Gok had no business rescuing nakumatt and should have none with KQ..This is the norm in capitalist countries, even finland had NOKIA,a global brand which their Government let it sink despite their gov owning very many shares

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
ATCL ilikufa kifo cha mende hata kabla wanunue drimulaina na pesa zetu za ndani, brt pia na sasa sgr ambayo imekwamia kibaha tangu desemba mwaka jana 😀😀
 
How do you compare electronic biz with Airline biz... KQ gives KAA 50% of its profit all the cash stays in Nairobi.. We are expanding to more cities and next year we're going to Sydney, Tokyo, Rio de jeneiro and Los Angeles we need more and more revenues KAA just needs to waiver fees on KQ and we're good to go.
1) A responsible Government always invests..Tz Taxes are invested in Planes that can be leased to anyone not just ATCL. And for that matter, you will never see lack of drugs in Tz hospitals, children learning under trees, people living like animals in slums or people getting food aid.
2)JKIA business is driven by passangers not KQ, if KQ vanishes, passagers remain because nairobi is a capital city with alot of contact with international companies, UN etc. Ethiopian would be very happy to own 2 hubs as they seek to dominate African market
3)Yes, responsible governments let private companies sink..Japan let SONY die off..If samsung fails to respond to the market, S.KOREA will let them sink..Canada let the mighty blackberry die too..Public money should never be used to rescue private business

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Sony makes phones, tvs, home theaters and is unrivaled in play stations..
Just because SONY is no longer the only TV in town, doesn't mean the company died. Last year SONY made record profits of over $2 billion. It is a big technology and entertainment behemoth.

Blackberry was beaten hands down by Apple. It did not fail because of lack of revenue.
Canada pumping money would not have saved it.

And no way Korea is letting Samsung fail. Together with Hyundai, LG and other family controlled behemoths, they employ almost half of all South Koreans.
They fail and South Korea unemployment rate will drop below LDC Tanzania's.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom