A government that spends hundreds of millions of $ to buy planes, when the country is languishing in poverty, should be toppled.
The only reason ATCL leases 'cheaply' is because you have a populist dictator only interested in being lavished with praises and not making financial sense.
KQ lessors are big companies, with the smallest having a fleet of 151 planes.
2. For someone who claims to be an economist, you have no idea how airline hubs work. JKIA is a hub for only two major airlines. KQ and Fly 540.
Unless you are an airline with hundreds of planes like Delta, you only have one hub or if I use a term you might understand, headquarter.
Why would Ethiopian or Rwandan make JKIA their headquarters when they have their own countries?
When KQ picks passengers from their different African routes, most of these flights must first fly through JKIA. The same way Ethiopian first flies passengers to Bole, or how Emirates passes through Dubai on its way to London.
If KQ were to collapse today, KAA would lose 50% of its revenue instantly.
3. When did Nokia sink? Are you living in an alternative universe? Last year it had revenues of almost $30 billion.
They just stopped making phones because Apple defeated them, like they did to everyone else in the market. Pumping money into Nokia does not mean they will make a better or more popular phone than Apple.
If that was the case, and Nokia had no resources, I'm sure the Finland government would have gladly helped.
The same way capitalist US rescued its banks, automotive industry etc in 2009.
The same way capitalist UK has been subsidizing their privately run railway service for decades.
Companies that have national significance should be saved if possible. Whether they are government owned, public or private, they are the drivers of the GDP.
Samsung is not a government-owned company, but it controls 14% of South Korea gdp. Is that a company that can be left to 'sink'.