Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Charles Kanjama has called on Kenyans to reject a reported proposal by the United States to establish an Ebola treatment centre in the country. Speaking amid growing public debate, Kanjama questioned the transparency and public participation surrounding the alleged plan, warning that such a facility could raise serious health, sovereignty, and security concerns.
According to reports, the proposed centre would reportedly be part of a wider partnership between Kenya and the United States aimed at strengthening preparedness against infectious diseases. However, Kanjama argued that Kenyans deserve full disclosure regarding the agreement, including details about its purpose, operational structure, and potential risks to citizens.
The LSK president emphasized that Kenya should prioritize protecting its citizens and healthcare systems rather than becoming a regional testing or containment ground for foreign health interests. He further urged Parliament and relevant government agencies to openly address the matter and provide clarity to the public.
The proposal has already sparked mixed reactions online, with some Kenyans supporting stronger disease preparedness infrastructure while others fear the country could be exposed to additional health risks. Public health experts have also weighed in, noting that Ebola outbreaks remain a major concern in parts of Africa and that preparedness facilities can help prevent rapid spread during emergencies.
As discussions continue, pressure is mounting on the government to clarify whether formal agreements exist and what safeguards would be put in place should the project move forward.
According to reports, the proposed centre would reportedly be part of a wider partnership between Kenya and the United States aimed at strengthening preparedness against infectious diseases. However, Kanjama argued that Kenyans deserve full disclosure regarding the agreement, including details about its purpose, operational structure, and potential risks to citizens.
The LSK president emphasized that Kenya should prioritize protecting its citizens and healthcare systems rather than becoming a regional testing or containment ground for foreign health interests. He further urged Parliament and relevant government agencies to openly address the matter and provide clarity to the public.
The proposal has already sparked mixed reactions online, with some Kenyans supporting stronger disease preparedness infrastructure while others fear the country could be exposed to additional health risks. Public health experts have also weighed in, noting that Ebola outbreaks remain a major concern in parts of Africa and that preparedness facilities can help prevent rapid spread during emergencies.
As discussions continue, pressure is mounting on the government to clarify whether formal agreements exist and what safeguards would be put in place should the project move forward.