EMT
Platinum Member
- Jan 13, 2010
- 14,477
- 15,325
- Thread starter
-
- #41
Be that as it may, I still think any issue relating to election petition is an issue of public interest.
I just don't see how an election petition cannot be of public interest.
If we're arguing not according to the law, but according to our opinion, then I might agree you.
There are valid reasons for any elector to be able to sue an elected.
The right to vote would be merely abstract if the right to sue to enforce it was not guaranteed in law.
Thus, it follows that standing in challenges to the outcome of elections should be granted as widely as possible.
In the United Kingdom, where we derived ours laws, an elector or candidate can bring an election petition at the election.
One of the reasons for this is that there will not always be a candidate at every election to bring a petition, for example, in uncontested elections.
However, to require that petitions may be presented by individuals (electors or candidates) and that a successful candidate is made a respondent makes the petition process closely analogous to a private legal action and not a public action.
Also, seeking elected offices is still an individual endeavour. The public does not force someone to context in an election.
The essential features and structure of the law has also not developed and so election petitions still remain a private matter.
.