Mapendekezo yangu juu ya asili ya uwepo wa kila kitu

Venus Star

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Posts
26,519
Reaction score
78,311
Wapendwa wana JF nimekuwa nikitafakari sana kuhusu mambo yalivyo. Nimesoma vitabu vya dini nikasoma sayansi, nimefanya meditation na kufanya mambo ya kila namna. Lengo lilikuwa kupata kujua uhalisia wa Existance.

Kila nikienda ndani zaidi mambo ndiyo yanazidi kuwa makubwa zaidi.

Asili yangu tangu nikiwa mdogo nimelelewa katika familia ya kikristo. Na nimejifunza vitu vingi sana kuhusu ukristo.

Kuna maandiko yaliyoandikwa kwenye biblia yalinifanya niweze kutafuta kujua ukweli ni nini?
Baada nikaja kuona Truth is an Illusion
Maandiko yenyewe ni:-
Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
Haya maandiko yalinifanya nianze kutafakari na kutafuta kujua What is the nature of Existance?

Haya hapa ni mapendekezo yangu binafsi:-

1. Tuachane na mawazo ya kufikiria kuhusu origin, source, creation na theory and beliefs zozote zinazoongelea oringin (Uumbwaji, Big bang etc).

2. Tuanze kufikiria kwa namna nyingine kwamba existence has no origin, source or creation.

3. Science na Religion zimeshindwa kuelezea kuhusu existence kwahiyo tunatakiwa kuruhusu free thinking and without bases of science or religion.

4. Tunatakiwa tufikirie kuwa we are all and what we see through our eye, devices, religion and science kwamba we are the part of this system we are living in, so we need to go outside of this system so as we can Identify nature of existence.

5. We cannot rely only on our physical experience through moral, values, ethics, experiments and observation to determine what existence is. We need to go beyond of this.

NB: Sipingi uwepo wa sayansi na dini, lakini tunatakiwa vilevile kwenda zaidi ya haya.
Katika thread hii nitachambua kwa kina na kuelezea kiundani zaidi mapendekezo yangu.

Karibuni.....
 
TANGU AKIWA MTOTO BINADAMU ANATAFUTA KUJUA KWANINI YUPO HAPA

Tamaa ya kuelewa uwepo na kusudi la mtu ni jambo la msingi la maumbile ya mwanadamu. Kuanzia umri mdogo, wanadamu wana udadisi wa asili juu ya ulimwengu unaowazunguka na wanatafuta kuelewa mahali pao ndani yake. Udadisi huu mara nyingi huongozwa na mambo mbalimbali, ikiwa ni pamoja na haja ya maana na kusudi, hamu ya kujitambua na ukuaji wa kibinafsi, na mwelekeo wa asili kuelekea utafutaji na ugunduzi.

Kwa njia nyingi, swali la "kwa nini" ni swali la msingi na la ulimwengu wote ambalo limeulizwa na wanadamu kwa milenia. Ni swali ambalo linagusa mambo mengi ya uzoefu wa kibinadamu, pamoja na falsafa, dini, na sayansi.

Kwa wengine, jibu la swali hili linaweza kupatikana katika imani za kidini au za kiroho, ambazo hutoa mfumo wa kuelewa maana na kusudi la uwepo wa mwanadamu. Wengine wanaweza kutafuta kujibu swali hili kupitia uchunguzi wa kisayansi na uelewa wa kina wa ulimwengu wa asili.

Mwishowe, hamu ya kuelewa ni kwanini tupo ni silika ya kibinadamu inayoonyesha udadisi wetu wa asili na utaftaji wetu wa maana na kusudi maishani.

Akitokea yeyote na kumwelezea kuwa yeye yupo kwa sababu kadha akiwa katika umri mdogo sana. Mtu huyo ataenda akikua na kulibeba jambo hilo. Na pale atakapo ona kuwa haja zake mbalimbali zinatimia basi ataacha kutafuta kujua lengo la yeye kuwepo hapa. Atasimamia yale aliyoambiwa na kuacha kuendelea kufanya utafiti wake.
 
Wazo kwamba kila kitu kina chanzo
Wazo kwamba kila kitu tunachokiona na tusichokiona kina chanzo au sababu ni dhana ya kimsingi katika nadharia nyingi za kifalsafa na kisayansi. Wazo hili limetokana na kanuni ya sababu, ambayo inasema kwamba kila tukio au jambo lazima liwe na sababu au maelezo.

Wanadamu huwa wanaona ulimwengu unaowazunguka kwa suala la uhusiano wa sababu na athari. Tunaona mifumo na utaratibu katika asili na kudhani kwamba lazima kuwe na baadhi ya sababu ya msingi au utaratibu kuwajibika kwa mifumo hii. Kwa mfano, tunaona jua likichomoza na kutua kila siku na kudhani kwamba lazima kuwe na maelezo ya kifizikia kwa jambo hili.

Kwa kuongezea, uelewa wetu wa ulimwengu umeundwa na uzoefu wetu na uchunguzi, na huwa tunafikiria kuwa sheria za asili na mifumo tunayoona ni thabiti na ya ulimwengu wote. Dhana hii inategemea imani kwamba ulimwengu hufanya kazi kulingana na sheria zinazotabirika na zenye utaratibu, na kwamba sheria hizi zinaweza kugunduliwa na kueleweka kupitia uchunguzi na majaribio.
 
The principle of causality

Kanuni ya sababu, pia inajulikana kama kanuni ya sababu na athari, ni wazo kwamba kila tukio lina sababu inayotangulia. Kwa maneno mengine, kila athari ina sababu, na sababu lazima iwe ilitokea kabla ya athari.

Kanuni ya sababu ni kanuni ya msingi katika sayansi, na ni muhimu kwa kuelewa ulimwengu wa asili. Inategemea wazo kwamba ulimwengu ni utaratibu na kutabirika, na kwamba matukio hutokea kama matokeo ya matukio mengine.

Kanuni ya sababu imetumika katika historia kuelezea matukio katika ulimwengu wa asili. Kwa mfano, wanaastronomia wa mapema walitumia kanuni ya sababu kuelezea mwendo wa sayari, na wanafizikia wa kisasa hutumia kuelezea tabia ya chembe ndogo za atomiki.

Ingawa kanuni ya sababu ni chombo chenye nguvu cha kuelewa ulimwengu, pia imekuwa mada ya mjadala wa kifalsafa. Wanafalsafa fulani husema kwamba kanuni ya kisababishi haitoshi kueleza matukio yote, na kwamba huenda kukawa na mambo mengine yanayohusika ambayo hayahusiani na kisababishi na matokeo. Walakini, kanuni ya sababu inabaki kuwa msingi wa fikira za kisayansi na uchunguzi.
 
1. Existence is a necessary truth that does not depend on any prior causes or conditions. From this perspective, existence is not something that can be created or brought into being, but rather something that is always already present.

2. Existence is a foundational and irreducible aspect of human experience. According to this view, the very act of thinking, perceiving, or knowing anything at all presupposes the existence of some kind of reality or world.

3. Existence is an indivisible concept that cannot be broken down into smaller or more fundamental components. From this perspective, the concept of existence is not something that can be reduced to or explained by any other concepts or principles.

4. Existence is self-evident and does not require any further explanation or justification.
 
Religion and Science struggle to explain the nature of existence


Religion and science struggle to explain the nature of existence because they approach the question from different perspectives and with different methods of inquiry.

Religion typically relies on faith, revelation, and tradition to provide answers to questions about the nature of existence. Religious beliefs and practices are often based on the idea of a divine or supernatural power that created and governs the universe. These beliefs can provide comfort, purpose, and meaning to individuals, but they are not necessarily based on empirical evidence or scientific inquiry.

Science, on the other hand, relies on empirical evidence, observation, and experimentation to understand the nature of existence. Scientific theories and explanations are based on observable phenomena and tested through rigorous experimentation and peer review. While science can provide us with a deep understanding of the physical world and how it operates, it is often limited in its ability to address questions of meaning, purpose, and morality.

Because religion and science approach the question of existence from different perspectives and with different methods, they often come to different conclusions or are unable to fully address all aspects of the question. This can create a perceived conflict between religion and science, as each seeks to provide its own unique perspective on the nature of existence.


KISWAHILI
Dini na sayansi vinatatizika kueleza asili ya uwepo kwa sababu wanalishughulikia swali kutoka mitazamo tofauti na kwa njia tofauti za uchunguzi.

Dini kwa kawaida hutegemea imani, ufunuo, na mapokeo ili kutoa majibu kwa maswali kuhusu asili ya kuwepo. Imani na mazoea ya kidini mara nyingi hutegemea wazo la nguvu ya kimungu au isiyo ya kawaida ambayo iliumba na kutawala ulimwengu. Imani hizi zinaweza kutoa faraja, kusudi, na maana kwa watu binafsi, lakini hazitegemei ushahidi wa kimajaribio au uchunguzi wa kisayansi.

Sayansi, kwa upande mwingine, inategemea ushahidi wa kimajaribio, uchunguzi, na majaribio ili kuelewa asili ya kuwepo. Nadharia na maelezo ya kisayansi yanatokana na matukio yanayoonekana na kujaribiwa kupitia majaribio makali na mapitio ya rika. Ingawa sayansi inaweza kutupatia ufahamu wa kina wa ulimwengu wa kimwili na jinsi unavyofanya kazi, mara nyingi huwa na mipaka katika uwezo wake wa kushughulikia maswali ya maana, madhumuni, na maadili.

Kwa sababu dini na sayansi hukabili suala la kuwepo kwa mitazamo tofauti na kwa mbinu tofauti, mara nyingi hufikia hitimisho tofauti au hawawezi kushughulikia kikamilifu vipengele vyote vya swali. Hili linaweza kuleta mzozo unaotambulika kati ya dini na sayansi, kwani kila moja inatafuta kutoa mtazamo wake wa kipekee juu ya asili ya kuwepo.
 
MATATIZO YA SOURCE OF EXISTANCE KWENYE SANYANSI

Tunaweza kuanza kujadili matatizo yanayozaliwa na sayansi kutokana na wazo lake la kwamba kila kitu lazima kina chanzo chake. Tukianza kufuatilia suala hili kwa kina kwa kupitia mawazo ya kisayansi linaenda kupotelea hewani tu.

Ngoja tutumie mfano mmoja tu wa kuhusu mwili wa binadamu
Tuaanza kama ifuatavyo:-

1. Mwili wa binadamu ni muunganiko wa System tofauti tofauti.

2. System ndani ya mwili wa mtu zimeundwa kwa organs mbalimbali

3. Organ zimetengenezwa kwa mkusanyiko wa tissue.

4. Tissue zimetengenezwa kutokana na mkusanyiko wa cells

5. Cells zimetengenezwa kwa organic molecules: nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids.

6. Molecules zimetengenezwa na Atoms

7. Atom imetenegenzwa za three particles known as subatomic particles: protons, neutrons and electrons.

8. Subatomic zimetengenezwa na Elementary Particles: Quarks, Leptons, Gauge bosons, Higgs boson

Kwenye Elementary Particles ndipo science inapoishia. Hawatuelezei sasa hizo elementary particles zimetoka wapi?
Sasa Theory of Causality inapoteza welekeo.

Nimejaribu kueleza hii kwa mtazamo wa kisayansi ili tuweze kuamsha hisia ya kutafuta namna nyingine zaidi.
Kwenye sayansi tunaona kigugumizi kinaingia kutokana na wazo lake la kutaka kujua source of existence.
 
mkuu Venus Star ngoja nikurahisishie;
1. Chanzo cha ulimwengu hakijulikani, hakuna aliye na majibu.,

2. Miungu unayoisoma kwenye vitabu haipo, ni wahusika wa kufikirika waliotengenezwa na binadamu zamani sana kipindi ambacho tulikua hatuwezi kufafanua vitu mbalimbali.....
 
Venus Star Kwa ufupi mkubwa, asili ya kila kitu ulimwenguni inafahamika kinachokutoa mchezoni ni kuanza kuhoji mambo yaliyokuzidi umri na maarifa, muumba wa ulimwengu yupo na ni kukosa adabu kukubwa kujifanya umejua kiingereza sasa unamchallenge muumba wako kwa hoja za kifalsafa, majibu ya maswali hayo anayo yeye mwenyewe wala hakuna kiumbe kitakachokushibisha ukaelewa.
 
ni sawa
 
Ninaheshimu mawazo yako
 
Venus Star said:
Science na Religion zimeshindwa kuelezea kuhusu existence kwahiyo tunatakiwa kuruhusu free thinking and without bases of science or religion.
Click to expand...
Ndugu yangu, kwa wakati wetu hapa duniani ni, vigumu kutafuta chanzo cha uwepo wa ulimwengu kando na maarifa ya Sayansi na Dini, ambayo wewe unapendekeza tuyaache, ili kujua chanzo cha uwepo wa ulimwengu.

Msingi wa dini ni imani, na msingi wa sayansi ni nadharia. Imani ni sayansi. Kwa hiyo dini ni sayansi.

Wewe ndugu yangu, unachopendekeza hapa ni, falsafa. Kwa vile ni falsafa ni, hivyohivyo sayansi.

Kwa hiyo, mapendelezo yako, kwa bahati mbaya yanakosa uhalali kwa sababu msingi wake haufahamiki na hivyo yanaangukia; ama kwenye madhehebu ya dini au sayansi.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…