MUST READ: EA opposition politicians setting bad precedents

ByaseL · 2011-07-01T11:46:34+00:00

By Jerry Okungu THIS week there were reports that the Ugandan opposition leaders have taken their campaign against president Yoweri Museveni to London and Washington. The aim here is to impress it upon donor communities that the regime in Kampala does not deserve Western support because the elections that gave Museveni another five-year term were not free and fair. The other line they are likely to peddle is that the Government back home is corrupt resulting in donor money being squandered by the elite in the Museveni regime. Norbert Mao, a noted Ugandan opposition leader is reported to have kept a 24-hour vigil outside the gates of the White House in the hope that President Barack Obama would give him a hearing. And as he was probably winding up his vigil, another Ugandan journalist, Charles Bukenya planned a hunger strike at the same venue until Obama agrees to see him! This is a very interesting development considering that Obama has mountains of his own problems that he must solve before he attends to numerous picketing individuals that are a permanent feature at the White House. Maybe a text message on his Blackberry would reach him faster. However, if Museveni is the issue, how about keeping vigil or going on hunger strike outside the gates of the presidential palace in Entebbe? Think about it. It might just move Museveni to tears and convince him to make concessions! Three weeks ago there were reports in the Kenyan press that our leading opposition leaders, some of who are candidates for The Hague trials later this year had met Presidents Jakaya Kikwete and Yoweri Museveni to map out strategies on how to stop Raila Odinga from winning the 2012 presidential elections. During those meetings, it was alleged that the two presidents had agreed to help Ruto and company to raise sh10b for the 2012 presidential race. Personally I dismissed such allegations as idle talk even if the RutoUhuru alliance held discussions with Kikwete and Museveni. There are two things we must consider in the actions taken by the Ugandan opposition chiefs and their Kenyan counterparts. First, campaigns in foreign capitals against home governments will not change the situation at home unless NATO allies decide to bomb Uganda in support of the opposition chiefs. As long as the same governments choose to do business with Uganda, no amount of demonstrations in London and Washington will change things in the streets of Kampala. The Kenyan situation is even more intriguing considering that the two presidents alleged to be plotting with Ruto and Uhuru are senior members of the East African Community (EAC). If indeed they undertake to underwrite the opposition campaign and their candidate loses, where will that debacle leave the unity of East Africa? Can the two heads of state be so naïve as to sacrifice the EAC dream on the altar of political expediency? For those who may not understand Kenyan politics, there are a few things that Kenyans deeply detest. Much as they will fight and kill each other over almost everything under the sun, mention of external foreign interference rallies Kenyans together like nothing else. The voters will reject anybody perceived to be a puppet of some super power because Kenyans dread recolonization. Another thing; the masses of Kenya tasted the blood of political anarchy in 2007-2008. If any leader in the region is imagining that he can manipulate Kenyas elections in his favour, this time it will not be just Kenya burning. The whole of East Africa will be in turmoil. And being the largest economy in the region, the effect will be felt beyond Uganda and Tanzania. Burundi, Rwanda and even the DRC will feel the heat. However in retrospect, now Kenyans are beginning to piece together where the Ruto-Uhuru alliance would get their sh10b from. The money would come not from Jakaya Kikwete or Yoweri Museveni as we were earlier made to believe. An activist in Kenya called Mwalimu Mati has gone through Uhurus 2011-2012 budgets and detected some very interesting mathematical 'errors' that if Parliament passed them unnoticed would have easily facilitated the release of sh10m to the opposition to which the finance minister belongs. This theory cannot be farfetched if you consider that the budget in the Kenya Embassy at The Hague jumped from sh3m to sh9m in anticipation of The Hague trials for the Ocampo Six; never mind that under normal circumstances, the Kenya government should not bear the burden of feeding The Hague suspects as that responsibility belongs with the ICC. In the 2011-2012 budgets The Hague Embassy has details of tea, cakes, mandazi and other things that go with tea. One wonders how much tea and goodies the Ocampo Six can consume in a year worth $100,000! Kenyans are waiting to see how Parliament will handle these allegations if indeed they exist. Let us hope Parliament will not sleep on the job as Treasury continues to fund fictitious projects as Mati says. jerryokungu@gmail.com

Thread starter ByaseL
Start date Jul 1, 2011

ByaseL

JF-Expert Member

Jul 1, 2011

Gagnija

JamiiForums uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Accept Learn more…

Back

Top Bottom

Forums

New posts

MUST READ: EA opposition politicians setting bad precedents

ByaseL

JF-Expert Member

Gagnija

Platinum Member

Our Community

Regional Communities