Nahisi Rais Putin atafyatua nyuklia kwa hapo alipofikishwa, hilo daraja tungesubirisha kwanza

Nahisi Rais Putin atafyatua nyuklia kwa hapo alipofikishwa, hilo daraja tungesubirisha kwanza

MK254

JF-Expert Member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
32,408
Reaction score
50,809
Yaani masaa machache baada ya Putin kusheherekea kumbukumbu ya kuzaliwa kwake (birthday), wazalendo wa Ukraine wakamtumia salamu kwa kulipua daraja ambalo lipo moyoni mwake, alilotumia hela ndefu sana $4b kulijenga na kalizindua yeye mwenyewe, kwanza mkandarasi alikua swahiba wake wa utotoni Arkady Rotenberg.

Majeshi yake yamekua yakifukuziwa kuanzia Kyev na mpaka sasa yanaendelea kupokea kipigo, ila kwenye hili la daraja kama asipofanya kweli baada ya hili pigo, kweli keshapwaya huyu........ muda ndio huu afanye kile ambacho amekua akitishia... Nina wasiwasi atabonyeza vitufe vya nyuklia, japo alishaambiwa akifanya hilo awe tayari kwa Urusi kufutika kwenye ramani ya dunia.....

(VIENNA) — Russian President Vladimir Putin is likely personally affected by the explosion on a crucial bridge linking Russia and the Ukrainian Crimean peninsula it occupies, which occurred hours after his birthday, England’s Ministry of Defense said on Sunday.

The British intelligence report makes a key link between Putin’s emotions and the military setback Russia now faces by damage to the Kerch Strait Bridge, signaling a major blow to both Russian operations and morale further under pressure by the Ukrainian military’s successful, counter-offensive advances.

“This incident will likely touch President Putin closely; it came hours after his 70th birthday, he personally sponsored and opened the bridge, and its construction contractor was his childhood friend, Arkady Rotenberg,” the U.K. Ministry of Defense tweeted.

The assessment added that while damage to the rail crossing is uncertain, “any serious disruption to its capacity will highly likely have a significant impact on Russia’s already strained ability to sustain its forces in southern Ukraine.”

Ukraine’s military has not officially claimed responsibility for the explosion on the Kerch Bridge Saturday, which damaged a section of freight railroad and severed a roadway that collapsed into the sea.

The Russian Foreign Ministry on Saturday tweeted a short, undated video of traffic moving on the bridge with a caption signaling that transit operations were continuing as normal.

Russian investigators said the explosion occurred from a truck.

Damage to the bridge is interpreted as a personal attack targeting Putin, with the span viewed as the Russian leader’s major, concrete manifestation of his stated claims to retake Ukraine. Russia invaded and occupied Crimea in 2014, imposing a referendum and annexing the territory in a move rejected by the international community at the time.

Putin celebrated the opening of the nearly $4 billion bridge in 2018 by driving a dump truck across a 12-mile section even as international powers condemned its construction as violation of international law and rejected Russia’s claims to Crimea.

Timothy Snyder, Yale historian of Russia and Ukraine, tweeted on Saturday that the bridge explosion “cripples Russian logistics and dissolves the major symbol of Putin’s power.”

Michael Kofman, director of the Russia Studies program at the Virginia-based think tank, CNA, said the explosion on the Kerch Bridge was meant to have “real operational effects” by disrupting Russian military supply lines related to its occupation of Ukraine’s Kherson region and efforts to control the region of Zaporizhzhia, with the Russian military occupying the region’s nuclear power plant but not all of the territory.

Kofman on the podcast “Geopolitics Decanted” called the explosion on the bridge “very coordinated” meant “potentially to degrade the supply lines to the south, to Kherson, Zhaporzhzhia, both from Crimea and both from mainland Russia.”

“I don’t think the attack on the Kerch bridge was just meant to be symbolic,” he added. “I think it was also meant to have real operational effects.”

The explosion and damage to the bridge, coupled with growing criticism in Russia of the war in Ukraine, still called a “special military operation,” are raising the possibility that Putin will lash out with nuclear weapons, amid his repeated threats of Moscow’s capabilities.

Hours after the bridge explosion, Russian missile strikes reportedly hit civilian areas in the Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia, with at least 12 killed and at least 49 injured, including six children.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called it “merciless strikes on peaceful people again.”

“Absolute meanness. Absolute evil. Savages and terrorists. From the one who gave this order to everyone who fulfilled this order. They will bear responsibility. For sure. Before the law and before people,” Zelensky wrote on his Facebook page.

Earlier, the Ukrainian president responded to the Kerch Bridge explosion that the future for Ukraine is “sunny.”

“This is a future without occupiers. Throughout our territory, in particular in the Crimea,” he said in his address Saturday night.

Mykhail Podolyak, adviser to the head of the office of Ukrainian president, tweeted “Crimea, the bridge, the beginning. Everything illegal must be destroyed, everything stolen must be returned to Ukraine, everything occupied by Russia must be expelled.”

And Anton Gerashchenko, adviser to the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, tweeted that “Israeli Mossad acknowledged today that they are no longer numbers one in the rating of world’s special services.”
 
Muacha azifyatue tu
Aiwezekani tuishi kwa kutishiana tishiana
Mtu muhimu na aliyewahi kuwa mkuu wa usalama amesema kuwa sasa ni wakati muafaka kwa Putin kutumia nyuklia kwenye ardhi ya NATO na si UKRAIN. Hii ni kuashiria kuwa warusi elites wameshaona kuwa Urusi haiwezi kufikia malengo yake. Infact, inaonesha kuwa pande zote wamejiandaa kwa vita sasa

FUATILIA HAPA

Igor Girkin says Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons​

Story by Zeleb.es • 1h ago

AA15yF5J.img


AA15yADg.img


1 of 17 Photos in Gallery Former Russian Federal Security Service officer and prominent military war blogger Igor Girkin—also known as Igor Strelkov—stated in a recent interview that Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons in its conflict with Ukraine.

Moscow should use its nuclear arsenal against NATO​

Former Russian Federal Security Service officer and prominent military war blogger Igor Girkin—also known as Igor Strelkov—stated in a recent interview that Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons in its conflict with Ukraine.
Interestingly, though, Girkin stated that rather than using Russia’s tactical nuclear arsenal on Ukraine, Moscow should use it against NATO member states. Girkin’s comments were made at the end of an hour and twenty-minute-long interview with Russian businessman Andrei Kovalyov, during which he explained why such a measure was needed.

I believe that we should use tactical nuclear weapons."​

"I believe that if we use nuclear weapons first, we will soon get a retaliatory strike," Girkin said, "I believe that we should use tactical nuclear weapons."
 
Putin mwenyewe na circle yake wanapenda bata sana hasa za Ulaya Magharibi, hawako tayari kupiga kibereti kwenye petrol ili waungue na kuisha wote.
 
Mtu muhimu na aliyewahi kuwa mkuu wa usalama amesema kuwa sasa ni wakati muafaka kwa Putin kutumia nyuklia kwenye ardhi ya NATO na si UKRAIN. Hii ni kuashiria kuwa warusi elites wameshaona kuwa Urusi haiwezi kufikia malengo yake. Infact, inaonesha kuwa pande zote wamejiandaa kwa vita sasa

FUATILIA HAPA

Igor Girkin says Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons​

Story by Zeleb.es • 1h ago

AA15yF5J.img


AA15yADg.img


1 of 17 Photos in Gallery Former Russian Federal Security Service officer and prominent military war blogger Igor Girkin—also known as Igor Strelkov—stated in a recent interview that Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons in its conflict with Ukraine.

Moscow should use its nuclear arsenal against NATO​

Former Russian Federal Security Service officer and prominent military war blogger Igor Girkin—also known as Igor Strelkov—stated in a recent interview that Moscow should use tactical nuclear weapons in its conflict with Ukraine.
Interestingly, though, Girkin stated that rather than using Russia’s tactical nuclear arsenal on Ukraine, Moscow should use it against NATO member states. Girkin’s comments were made at the end of an hour and twenty-minute-long interview with Russian businessman Andrei Kovalyov, during which he explained why such a measure was needed.

I believe that we should use tactical nuclear weapons."​

"I believe that if we use nuclear weapons first, we will soon get a retaliatory strike," Girkin said, "I believe that we should use tactical nuclear weapons."
Kutumia nuclear dhidi ya NATO ni suicide mission kwa Russia maana na yeye lazima watamtandika kwa Nyuklia.

Na hii si mara ya Kwanza Kwa viongozi wa Russia kutaka nyuklia itumike,huyu hapa chini ni kamanda wa Urusi naye alikua akisisitiza kwamba bila kutumia nyuklia hawawezi kushinda hii vita.

 
Back
Top Bottom